Pages:
Author

Topic: Using the blockchain to create/power sentient robotic life (Read 2697 times)

full member
Activity: 165
Merit: 100
The blockchain utilizes the planet Neptune, just like everything else illusion related..
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Live Free Or Die
According to Leonard Nimoy in an episode of In Search Of All you need for life is hot rocks and water.

My question is how do you create a sentient robot and have it not be totally insane from your point of view? If you program it how to think then you've failed at the task at hand.



Yea that's one of the "fears". If the being goes rogue and takes a adolf hitler approach to human beings. I suppose you'd have to implement in ability to have a human's concept and perspective of morality.


This.

http://localroger.com/prime-intellect/
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
I just found something a bit similar to this(https://bitcointa.lk/threads/putting-a-person-on-a-block-chain.338246/), though it speaks about the concept of placing human "consciousness" on the blockchain(I think something simpler than a human brain) like a rat's, would be more feasible, if possible at all.

Nice find, another interesting read... But i also agree, i think a rats brain is much more likely/possible. then maybe with more development we could get to the level of a chimpanzee or something, but i think the human brain would take a long time.  Sad

We haven't even "decoded" the human brain yet-it has around 100billion neurons. So yea a rat's would be much more plausible atm.

A human brain is indeed impossible, science fiction. Now a rodent, or even better a fly... maybe. But having something decoded doesn't mean it's feasible to emulate it just yet.

"Decoding" a human brain is actually more than possible. There's already several initiatives focusing on that right now. Replicating it's functions should be the next step and fairly straight forward once it's been "decoded".
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1014
I just found something a bit similar to this(https://bitcointa.lk/threads/putting-a-person-on-a-block-chain.338246/), though it speaks about the concept of placing human "consciousness" on the blockchain(I think something simpler than a human brain) like a rat's, would be more feasible, if possible at all.

Nice find, another interesting read... But i also agree, i think a rats brain is much more likely/possible. then maybe with more development we could get to the level of a chimpanzee or something, but i think the human brain would take a long time.  Sad

We haven't even "decoded" the human brain yet-it has around 100billion neurons. So yea a rat's would be much more plausible atm.

A human brain is indeed impossible, science fiction. Now a rodent, or even better a fly... maybe. But having something decoded doesn't mean it's feasible to emulate it just yet.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
we will find out when we build a biologically accurate model, simulating the trillions of cells, proteins, molecules and dna... then we can find out which sequences of the dna are causing our over all sociology.

Would a "sentient" artificial intelligence need to replicate human biological functions at all though assuming it's software based? I suppose if talking about a "AGI" that's hardware based, then sort of replicating human biology would be necessary, but software based intelligences wouldn't need to imo.
hero member
Activity: 727
Merit: 500
Minimum Effort/Maximum effect
we will find out when we build a biologically accurate model, simulating the trillions of cells, proteins, molecules and dna... then we can find out which sequences of the dna are causing our over all sociology.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
According to Leonard Nimoy in an episode of In Search Of All you need for life is hot rocks and water.

My question is how do you create a sentient robot and have it not be totally insane from your point of view? If you program it how to think then you've failed at the task at hand.



Yea that's one of the "fears". If the being goes rogue and takes a adolf hitler approach to human beings. I suppose you'd have to implement in ability to have a human's concept and perspective of morality.
legendary
Activity: 3976
Merit: 1421
Life, Love and Laughter...
I know this may sound a bit, well "crazy" to some. But basically Bitcoin is decentralized, the human body in a way of sorts, is also decentralized. The brain itself may be compared to mining pools where they allow things to happen according to consensus, so such a system would have to be similar to mining(Maybe not as secure nor "decentralized"-solo mining, and it would need to be in a "loop" or functioning on it's own without need for a external source(mining?), or not, maybe this "external source" would be similar to a biological organism needing food and water to "live").

Has anyone else thought of this, using Bitcoin's blockchain to create a sort of sentient artificial intelligence/body? I'm not talking about a highly advanced robot like in The Terminator/Matrix movies or anything, just something simple or comparable to maybe a small multi celled organism like a rodent.

Maybe the brain could use one, central blockchain, and the other major organs or what ought to represent them, use other lesser blockchains that relay information back and forth, things like colored coins could come into play representing various cells found throughout biological bodies like red/white blood cells etc, mining could rely information back and forth or a process similar. Instead of relaying transactions and inputs/outputs or what forms "coins", maybe a substitute for information such as "thoughts", "emotions"(more specifically the hormones that are responsible for such emotions) could be transacted back and forth instead, there would need to be physical hardware built such as heat sensors, touch, etc for "thoughts" or reactions based upon the "senses" even become feasible, and there'd need to be a way to store memories similar to the cerebrum, hippocampus and other areas responsible for memory in the brain.  Aargh, but that's just the little that I could come up with for the moment.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
According to Leonard Nimoy in an episode of In Search Of All you need for life is hot rocks and water.

My question is how do you create a sentient robot and have it not be totally insane from your point of view? If you program it how to think then you've failed at the task at hand.

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
Some great philosophical discussion going on here. I think we have the potential to make great AI (still waiting for an actual, functioning DAC to be launched), but I don't think we actually have the power to "spawn new lifeforms" (outside of traditional procreation), biologically or digitally.

Creation is a power reserved for God. I believe this not because I am religious but because I read that article posted earlier about how there may have been no beginning to the universe, ergo life may have always existed in some form or another and just hitches rides across space on comets, astroids and what not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia

Having said that, with modern genetic engineering we can create some pretty crazy stuff, like rats that glow in the dark and pigs that can fly. Well, maybe not that last one. But we should really get back to concentrating on reanimating extinct species.

Hmm, by spawn new lifeforms, do you mean creating life without the foundation of other pre-existing life? Like creating an entirely new life-form on a digital plane, or from "creating" life from other living cells, like cloning or creating a hybrid species. If the latter, then that's something currently out of our grasp, but I believe it's ultimately possible, and the former has already been done. A good argument for creating life without the foundation of other "life" or organic things, is the first "life" that was formed originally. If the theory about inorganic things giving rise to organic life in the right conditions is correct, then creating life on something like a digital plane should be more than possible.

We also have to define what "life" is. There are people studying the potential existence of non-traditional forms of life, so life that wont need the requirements or be composed of the things that the majority of life we know needs(carbon for ex), and life has even been found in extreme places such as hydrothermal vents in the ocean where the water is extremely hot and there's little to no light.

A interesting article around this subject is here: http://www.gizmag.com/bringing-life-to-inoganic-matter/19855/
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Some great philosophical discussion going on here. I think we have the potential to make great AI (still waiting for an actual, functioning DAC to be launched), but I don't think we actually have the power to "spawn new lifeforms" (outside of traditional procreation), biologically or digitally.

Creation is a power reserved for God. I believe this not because I am religious but because I read that article posted earlier about how there may have been no beginning to the universe, ergo life may have always existed in some form or another and just hitches rides across space on comets, astroids and what not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia

Having said that, with modern genetic engineering we can create some pretty crazy stuff, like rats that glow in the dark and pigs that can fly. Well, maybe not that last one. But we should really get back to concentrating on reanimating extinct species.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
Maybe if we build it we will find something different, logic will take us so far... until we realize that what we experience is random and the attenuation of each memory and action may be limited by physical circuits to completely understand reality... but within those limits there is a battle of what choice we make, which can be the difference between a glial cell connecting two neurons or bringing one closer to another.

The complexity of the information being percieved creates this... the chance for absolute randomness.

What controls the sequence in which we experience reality?
Can the circuitry be complex enough to assemble quantum probability within the brain?
What controls the weight that we place towards our different memories and how are they assembled within the brain? Could differences in processing sequence create different results?



Hmm, those are still questions that need to be "answered". Kind of hard to say how memories are assembled in the brain, though there seems to be proof that memories or segments of memories may also be partly stored in other parts of the body also, like when someone get a kidney transplant and get a craving for foods that the original owner of the kidney loved. Not much info on that so just a theory. It could be that for different situations we have different sequences involved with recalling memories, like the memory one has of driving a car and knowing that green is the command to go, would be the easiest to recall since it's most relevant to the situation at hand. It's probably so much more complex than that and might deal with input from the different senses to recall memories most relevant, maybe a bit like dejavu.

I suppose environmental factors also play a role, mutations in dna, and more.
hero member
Activity: 727
Merit: 500
Minimum Effort/Maximum effect
Maybe if we build it we will find something different, logic will take us so far... until we realize that what we experience is random and the attenuation of each memory and action may be limited by physical circuits to completely understand reality... but within those limits there is a battle of what choice we make, which can be the difference between a glial cell connecting two neurons or bringing one closer to another.

The complexity of the information being percieved creates this... the chance for absolute randomness.

What controls the sequence in which we experience reality?
Can the circuitry be complex enough to assemble quantum probability within the brain?
What controls the weight that we place towards our different memories and how are they assembled within the brain? Could differences in processing sequence create different results?

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
That is quite an interesting notion you have there...and I am sure...now with our current technology integrated with something akin to blockchain..would we be able to create a robot that is partially sentient...makes me wonder...brings up a lot of my childhood memories where I wanted to have my own robots do my bidding...Ahahaha Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
As I see it, consciousness is the source.  Brains are like a receiving and transmitting device and are needed as part of the nervous system and the body, but aren't the actual source of awareness itself.  They are more of a concurrent manifestation of biology on this plane of existence.  

AI will become quite advanced in the future, but machines will never be truly conscious.  "Sentient robots" are probably impossible because consciousnss/awareness isn't derived from anything in the physical domain.  I do realize I'm taking a philosophical position with that statement so not everyone will agree.

The blockchain is great for what it does, but I don't think it is necessarily the right tool for AI.

Awareness, or at least self awareness is a phenomena of the brain(Physical) and it's not just humans that exhibit it, there are already some species of animals that are self aware such as Chimpanzees, dolphins, etc. There is no metaphysical domain that we know of, all our attributes, our thoughts, our "self" stems from the physical brain, which is why things like injuries to the brain may result in personality changes, depression, mental retardation, losing some abilities such as speech, coordination etc.


 You only need look to love to know there is something beyond the physical.  some would say that is ultimately attributable to brain chemistry (material reductionism) but I would not.


With all due respect, the fact you would not reveals you're not actually interested in a factual explanation but need to be coddled by a romantic ideal. Everything you are, we are, is at its core electrical pulses and chemistry. Every state of being you are is fueled, caused, and directed by chemical interaction. Your feelings *are* chemicals. It's a variety of chemical interactions causing the end results of feelings, desires, thoughts, movements, actions.

You cannot, with all respect for reality and common sense, deny that if one were to have the brain removed from the skull, the individual ceases to live. The brain is the control center for you and bottom line, we as reproductive animals are only here to make more reproductive animals. All our sexual behaviors are not caused by mental illness or psychological issues but by pure chemistry. The chemistry of hormones and neurotransmitters and a cocktail of chemicals *cause* us to feel sexually aroused, *cause* us to attach desire toward one person, *cause* us to feel nothing at all for someone else, *cause* us to desire intercourse...and most pathetic of all, everyone calling females whores and sluts, or giving people a hard time about cheating - it's all chemically induced. The menstrual cycle in females is the entire clock and cause of a woman's sexual nature for better or worse, operating monthly to impel her to desire sex for reproduction.

It's all chemistry all the time.

Sexual desire has nothing at all to do with psychology, emotion, ideals, morality or values. It's built into each of us to reproduce the species.

Our bodies, our beings have no special cosmic purpose here and it's narcissistic and egoism that we believe this is why we're all here.

Our bodies are vehicles to transport sex cells and move them from one to another to make more bodies to transport sex cells and it's all operated and caused by brain chemistry.

Love is a chemical reaction. Sex and love are two different things. It's not cosmic, we're not here to be rock stars and celebrities. There's no such thing as a soul mate, there's no one person "put here" just for us. Cheating is only a social ill but Mother Nature built us for multiple mates (which is why cheating is inevitable if you tie up somewhere "for the duration). We do not mate for life, it's antithetical to our entire existence. We were all "born" to reproduce. Outside of that, sex is recreational choice. We are here to reproduce this species and if we adapt well the changing conditions we survive. If not, we're terminated.



It's all chemistry all the time...and this reality withstands all romantic notions from those too frail to face it.


Embracing reality as it is and not as you wish it to be is the first step toward living a productive, quality, intellectually, and psychologically sound existence.  Smiley

I'm not going to debate you -- you're absolutely correct within the boundaries of logic, science, and the intellect.
For many many years, those things represented the ultimate truth to me as well.

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
As I see it, consciousness is the source.  Brains are like a receiving and transmitting device and are needed as part of the nervous system and the body, but aren't the actual source of awareness itself.  They are more of a concurrent manifestation of biology on this plane of existence.  

AI will become quite advanced in the future, but machines will never be truly conscious.  "Sentient robots" are probably impossible because consciousnss/awareness isn't derived from anything in the physical domain.  I do realize I'm taking a philosophical position with that statement so not everyone will agree.

The blockchain is great for what it does, but I don't think it is necessarily the right tool for AI.

Awareness, or at least self awareness is a phenomena of the brain(Physical) and it's not just humans that exhibit it, there are already some species of animals that are self aware such as Chimpanzees, dolphins, etc. There is no metaphysical domain that we know of, all our attributes, our thoughts, our "self" stems from the physical brain, which is why things like injuries to the brain may result in personality changes, depression, mental retardation, losing some abilities such as speech, coordination etc.


 You only need look to love to know there is something beyond the physical.  some would say that is ultimately attributable to brain chemistry (material reductionism) but I would not.


With all due respect, the fact you would not reveals you're not actually interested in a factual explanation but need to be coddled by a romantic ideal. Everything you are, we are, is at its core electrical pulses and chemistry. Every state of being you are is fueled, caused, and directed by chemical interaction. Your feelings *are* chemicals. It's a variety of chemical interactions causing the end results of feelings, desires, thoughts, movements, actions.

You cannot, with all respect for reality and common sense, deny that if one were to have the brain removed from the skull, the individual ceases to live. The brain is the control center for you and bottom line, we as reproductive animals are only here to make more reproductive animals. All our sexual behaviors are not caused by mental illness or psychological issues but by pure chemistry. The chemistry of hormones and neurotransmitters and a cocktail of chemicals *cause* us to feel sexually aroused, *cause* us to attach desire toward one person, *cause* us to feel nothing at all for someone else, *cause* us to desire intercourse...and most pathetic of all, everyone calling females whores and sluts, or giving people a hard time about cheating - it's all chemically induced. The menstrual cycle in females is the entire clock and cause of a woman's sexual nature for better or worse, operating monthly to impel her to desire sex for reproduction.

It's all chemistry all the time.

Sexual desire has nothing at all to do with psychology, emotion, ideals, morality or values. It's built into each of us to reproduce the species.

Our bodies, our beings have no special cosmic purpose here and it's narcissistic and egoism that we believe this is why we're all here.

Our bodies are vehicles to transport sex cells and move them from one to another to make more bodies to transport sex cells and it's all operated and caused by brain chemistry.

Love is a chemical reaction. Sex and love are two different things. It's not cosmic, we're not here to be rock stars and celebrities. There's no such thing as a soul mate, there's no one person "put here" just for us. Cheating is only a social ill but Mother Nature built us for multiple mates (which is why cheating is inevitable if you tie up somewhere "for the duration). We do not mate for life, it's antithetical to our entire existence. We were all "born" to reproduce. Outside of that, sex is recreational choice. We are here to reproduce this species and if we adapt well the changing conditions we survive. If not, we're terminated.



It's all chemistry all the time...and this reality withstands all romantic notions from those too frail to face it.


Embracing reality as it is and not as you wish it to be is the first step toward living a productive, quality, intellectually, and psychologically sound existence.  Smiley

Very in depth, beautifully said!
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Live Free Or Die
As I see it, consciousness is the source.  Brains are like a receiving and transmitting device and are needed as part of the nervous system and the body, but aren't the actual source of awareness itself.  They are more of a concurrent manifestation of biology on this plane of existence.  

AI will become quite advanced in the future, but machines will never be truly conscious.  "Sentient robots" are probably impossible because consciousnss/awareness isn't derived from anything in the physical domain.  I do realize I'm taking a philosophical position with that statement so not everyone will agree.

The blockchain is great for what it does, but I don't think it is necessarily the right tool for AI.

Awareness, or at least self awareness is a phenomena of the brain(Physical) and it's not just humans that exhibit it, there are already some species of animals that are self aware such as Chimpanzees, dolphins, etc. There is no metaphysical domain that we know of, all our attributes, our thoughts, our "self" stems from the physical brain, which is why things like injuries to the brain may result in personality changes, depression, mental retardation, losing some abilities such as speech, coordination etc.


 You only need look to love to know there is something beyond the physical.  some would say that is ultimately attributable to brain chemistry (material reductionism) but I would not.


With all due respect, the fact you would not reveals you're not actually interested in a factual explanation but need to be coddled by a romantic ideal. Everything you are, we are, is at its core electrical pulses and chemistry. Every state of being you are is fueled, caused, and directed by chemical interaction. Your feelings *are* chemicals. It's a variety of chemical interactions causing the end results of feelings, desires, thoughts, movements, actions.

You cannot, with all respect for reality and common sense, deny that if one were to have the brain removed from the skull, the individual ceases to live. The brain is the control center for you and bottom line, we as reproductive animals are only here to make more reproductive animals. All our sexual behaviors are not caused by mental illness or psychological issues but by pure chemistry. The chemistry of hormones and neurotransmitters and a cocktail of chemicals *cause* us to feel sexually aroused, *cause* us to attach desire toward one person, *cause* us to feel nothing at all for someone else, *cause* us to desire intercourse...and most pathetic of all, everyone calling females whores and sluts, or giving people a hard time about cheating - it's all chemically induced. The menstrual cycle in females is the entire clock and cause of a woman's sexual nature for better or worse, operating monthly to impel her to desire sex for reproduction.

It's all chemistry all the time.

Sexual desire has nothing at all to do with psychology, emotion, ideals, morality or values. It's built into each of us to reproduce the species.

Our bodies, our beings have no special cosmic purpose here and it's narcissistic and egoism that we believe this is why we're all here.

Our bodies are vehicles to transport sex cells and move them from one to another to make more bodies to transport sex cells and it's all operated and caused by brain chemistry.

Love is a chemical reaction. Sex and love are two different things. It's not cosmic, we're not here to be rock stars and celebrities. There's no such thing as a soul mate, there's no one person "put here" just for us. Cheating is only a social ill but Mother Nature built us for multiple mates (which is why cheating is inevitable if you tie up somewhere "for the duration). We do not mate for life, it's antithetical to our entire existence. We were all "born" to reproduce. Outside of that, sex is recreational choice. We are here to reproduce this species and if we adapt well the changing conditions we survive. If not, we're terminated.



It's all chemistry all the time...and this reality withstands all romantic notions from those too frail to face it.


Embracing reality as it is and not as you wish it to be is the first step toward living a productive, quality, intellectually, and psychologically sound existence.  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
As I see it, consciousness is the source.  Brains are like a receiving and transmitting device and are needed as part of the nervous system and the body, but aren't the actual source of awareness itself.  They are more of a concurrent manifestation of biology on this plane of existence.  

AI will become quite advanced in the future, but machines will never be truly conscious.  "Sentient robots" are probably impossible because consciousnss/awareness isn't derived from anything in the physical domain.  I do realize I'm taking a philosophical position with that statement so not everyone will agree.

The blockchain is great for what it does, but I don't think it is necessarily the right tool for AI.

Awareness, or at least self awareness is a phenomena of the brain(Physical) and it's not just humans that exhibit it, there are already some species of animals that are self aware such as Chimpanzees, dolphins, etc. There is no metaphysical domain that we know of, all our attributes, our thoughts, our "self" stems from the physical brain, which is why things like injuries to the brain may result in personality changes, depression, mental retardation, losing some abilities such as speech, coordination etc.


 You only need look to love to know there is something beyond the physical.  some would say that is ultimately attributable to brain chemistry (material reductionism) but I would not.

Hmm, even the emotion of love is dictated by hormones in the body such as Oxytocin(though it's more a "social" hormone, but it's released during intimate activities and leads to that feeling of euphoria), the average person's sex drive(sex is a form of love) is also determined by a variety of physical things like the hormone Serotonin. It's the reason why some people are "naturally" more "loveedubby", as well as why some people are more prone to depression etc. There are even people who have very limited to no sex drive due to hormonal changes in their body or no sex drive at all since their birth(Asexuality). And, there's some who cannot experience love the way the majority of the population does, those with Aspergers Syndrome for example, can't "love" like the "average" person can(Can't feel empathy).
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
As I see it, consciousness is the source.  Brains are like a receiving and transmitting device and are needed as part of the nervous system and the body, but aren't the actual source of awareness itself.  They are more of a concurrent manifestation of biology on this plane of existence.  

AI will become quite advanced in the future, but machines will never be truly conscious.  "Sentient robots" are probably impossible because consciousnss/awareness isn't derived from anything in the physical domain.  I do realize I'm taking a philosophical position with that statement so not everyone will agree.

The blockchain is great for what it does, but I don't think it is necessarily the right tool for AI.

Awareness, or at least self awareness is a phenomena of the brain(Physical) and it's not just humans that exhibit it, there are already some species of animals that are self aware such as Chimpanzees, dolphins, etc. There is no metaphysical domain that we know of, all our attributes, our thoughts, our "self" stems from the physical brain, which is why things like injuries to the brain may result in personality changes, depression, mental retardation, losing some abilities such as speech, coordination etc.


  You only need look to love to know there is something beyond the physical.  some would say that is ultimately attributable to brain chemistry (material reductionism) but I would not.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
very interesting concept. so basically you are intending to use the blockchain as memory? each transaction is an update on an idea being processed by the active mining nodes and the relay nodes are single repositories of delegated information for the network; By doing it this way, Bitcoin has a memory that allows it to be self-aware, seeing how it has changed it's thoughts about the world as it has lived. Each person providing nourishment in the form of computation or relays of stored information.  By allowing the A.I to form it's own rules it can begin to program it's own views about life, the universe and everything... granted that it can code the appropriate system for quantifying interesting information with a robust scoping system so that it can keep on top of it's own personal priorities... which are mutable themselves.

I love the idea, why not include humans as well? it would be simple enough to setup a system like Devtome where humans contribute their knowledge to a database and make it searchable and reconfigurable by both humans and A.I. with the right tagging system a dynamic association system can emerge.

Bigger geekgasm.

I wonder though if maybe we - and by we I mean scientists that aren't us per se - are working on AI and BMI backwards and instead of trying to put brains on chips or the block chain it might be easier and more probable to put the blockchain in the brain, adapt the brain itself to a blockchain esque function.

The idea of mind uploading is incredibly cool in concept but either they're describing it incorrectly or they're going about it incorrectly because the mind isn't a thing that has tangible properties that can be digitized or moved. Thoughts, feelings, desires, ideas, emotions, actions, are all end results of brain activity. There is nothing causal in a thought or feeling or emotion (and it irks the hell out of me when people go "he makes me happy" or "she made me mad" because we don't cause these end results in one another, there's no mechanism in a feeling or thought or desire to manipulate the recipient or perceiver). It begins and ends with the brain. Anything we feel, think, say or do is a direct end result of our brain and how we interpret what we've perceived, and the reaction/response is rooted in our own paradigm - our collection of perceptions and understanding of our environments and our places in it. Our own brains "make" us mad or happy, but we blame it on other people. If it was possible for us to cause states in others, the world would be markedly different than this one. We wouldn't need self help stuff and there wouldn't be a seduction market because we could just 'make' someone dig us and 'make' someone hate someone else.

I like to look at the paradigm as the equivalent of our own customized user's manual. Anything we perceive that's compatible with what's been established and accepted by us as true will be accepted. Anything that's incompatible will result in an endless debate that goes nowhere. It's why people at odds can't ever find common ground.

Anyway, since it's all end result and intangible, there's no possible way to move or upload a 'mind'...mind is the end result of brain behavior/functioning so unless it's just an inaccurate way of talking about it and they're doing something else, mind uploading isn't going to happen because it can't happen.

My understanding of what they're looking to do, with regard for AI and digitizing "mind" is actually that in learning the brain behavior/functioning and modifying it to a digital format which is then a mirror copy of our brain's activity that cause these end results we can find a better substrate to hold it, move it, download it into some other form - all that is largely doable and then gives rise to the big paranoid question of "is it us or a copy of us or something else"?

Adding to the problem in the example above using the blockchain as a memory store, what sort of interface would be required? How would it likely need to work to store it from the brain to blockchain?

It seems to me it'd be easier to figure out a way to modify our brains to work in concert with the blockchain or blockchain like in a figurative sense than literally. Or, at the very least, figure out a way to use the brain power as the processing power for AI.

Damn, I love the future. I love this topic, I love AI, bitcoin, BMI - all of it. I hope I am still around when these problems are solved and the first technologies erupt.


Very interesting post, I believe when the brain is finally mapped out, all avg. 100billion neurons, then we may become closer to achieiving the current theoretical goal of "mind uploading" onto different platforms.

Something else that I've given some thought to was the possibility of using the blockchain or a structure similar to command or regulate nanorobots/machines, after reading this post http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/2z7p1u/a_human_patient_with_late_stage_leukemia_will_be/ - A human patient with late stage leukemia will be given DNA nanobot treatment. Without the DNA nanobot treatment the patient would be expected to die in the summer of 2015. Based upon animal trials they expect to remove the cancer within one month.
Pages:
Jump to: