legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1412
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You should create a unique thread instead of copying from someone else. Nevermind, the original thread has been deleted or whatever. You must make it your own style and format.
Well, yes and no... First of all it's unclear if there was good reason for Ratimov to delete his thread. But so long as his thread remains deleted/erased, I don't think it's reasonable to say that he owns the formatting of text about a certain topic more than anyone else. I mean yes, in a court of law this argument might stand. But hey we're right here in this forum for running the bitorrent of money, we don't value copyrights that much as real rights. BUT! If Ratimov wants to bring back his thread, as per forum rules, his thread would be the original, at least in my opinion. He showed to have strong feelings on the matter and yet didn't show interest in maintaining his thread. But Really there's not much he can do. To me it's on him for deleting his.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 2169
Need PR/CMC & CG? TG @The_Cryptovator
You should create a unique thread instead of copying from someone else. Nevermind, the original thread has been deleted or whatever. You must make it your own style and format. Anyone can post about cards, but they should be unique and shouldn't steal information from others that they struggle to collect. Otherwise, you must quote the whole thread. I will advise you to archive this thread and collect information yourself about the latest and most active cards. I won't really welcome such a thread; otherwise, your choice.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 4508
**In BTC since 2013**
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
Don't want to get into the drama either, just suggesting using a table like below. I think it's more pleasing to the eye.  | ⠀
- Card Type - VISA
- Production Cost - €30.00
- Supported Coins - BTC, LTC, ETH, USDT (ERC20)
- Supported Countries - Worldwide (except for restricted countries)
- Service fee - €1.50 (monthly)
- Fees - 3 - 5%
- ATM Withdraw - €2.00 + 2%
- Funding Methods - OWNR Wallet (instructions)
- Has Wallet Service - YES
|
That's perfect! Maybe, but tables are do not handle long elements as well as lists.
Couldn't they be abbreviated with the ISO 3166-1 code [1] and also based on the coin ticker (symbol) [2]? 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-12. https://coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all I think that will work with the country codes - the coins are already labelled as tickers.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 633
Your keys, your responsibility
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
I will not enter in this drama, I just think that creating a table with the "name of the card" | website | Card Type | Production Cost | Supported Coins | Supported Countries | Service fee | Fees | ATM Withdraw | Funding Methods | Wallet Availability... Will be more interesting and avoid what was said above about copy paste..
Maybe, but tables are do not handle long elements as well as lists. Look at the signature campaign list for example. It works because all of the text is very small. But the nature of this text is such that things like "Supported Coins" and "Supported Countries" will naturally be longer. Unless, I list only the main coins and regions and make yes/no columns for each one. But maybe that is not a bad idea. I'm not here to join the argue or misunderstanding above, but i just observed the wrong info to make it fix by the OP, looks like wrong side up. Uphold
...
Supported Coins - United States, soon to be deployed in Europe.
Supported Countries - BAT, BCH, BTG, BTC, DASH, LBA, ETH, LTC, RVR, XRP
Good catch, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 836
Top Crypto Casino
I'm not here to join the argue or misunderstanding above, but i just observed the wrong info to make it fix by the OP, looks like wrong side up. Uphold
...
Supported Coins - United States, soon to be deployed in Europe.
Supported Countries - BAT, BCH, BTG, BTC, DASH, LBA, ETH, LTC, RVR, XRP
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1140
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
If I deleted this topic, this does not mean that anyone can now freely copy it and pass it off as their own work. You didn’t even ask me about running my own topic with my original data instead of me,
I really liked your original thread and appreciated its contents. I enjoyed the list and participated in the previous topic which I was quite surprised to find the OP on it deleted.. I will not enter in this drama, I just think that creating a table with the "name of the card" | website | Card Type | Production Cost | Supported Coins | Supported Countries | Service fee | Fees | ATM Withdraw | Funding Methods | Wallet Availability... Will be more interesting and avoid what was said above about copy paste..
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
Guys let's try to keep the discussion on topic to crypto cards. There's a reason why I didn't make this thread self moderated you know 
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Instead of that line you should have used this one: " In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme [...]".
I am not claiming your work. You should. This way he will also understand better how it feels when his own work is stolen. Unless it was also a work stolen from another author. If I deleted this topic, this does not mean that anyone can now freely copy it and pass it off as their own work. Actually, it does. Besides, have you asked any author when you stole his intellectual property and introduced at as being yours? You present this information as if you are the author LOL! This is the most hilarious situation: BitcoinTalk's greatest plagiarist of all times complaining that someone stole his work =))) This is getting ridiculous.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1412
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If I deleted this topic, this does not mean that anyone can now freely copy it and pass it off as their own work. You didn’t even ask me about running my own topic with my original data instead of me,
I really liked your original thread and appreciated its contents. The ideal scenario in this situation would have been for you to never delete the thread. I don't know why you did in the first place actually. If your thread was never deleted/locked, nobody could have copied it as it would have been a duplicate. You didn’t even ask me about running my own topic with my original data instead of me,
To me it doesn't make sense to have to ask for permission to create a thread about debit cards just because you did it before. It's just public information. The importance is in updating the info. Not collecting and formatting it... Likewise I had a thread about debit cards in 2015 but got bored of maintaining it. And after I abandoned it I didn't go after anyone creating similar threads. Honestly I don't see why all the fuss here. Threads on bitcointalk don't make money anyway so no reason to get upset at someone for wanting to spread information. But if you want to restore your original thread, I would be supportive. What matters is to have information available. But if you restore your thread it would indeed be the true original and hence no duplicates could exist unless NotATether made significant and meaningful contributions to alter it.
|
so I'm wondering how do people make use of these cards in places that accept one of the Big Four card networks.
