Pages:
Author

Topic: Valium, Xanax, testosterone, Viagra, Clenbuterol- No prescription no rx - page 9. (Read 71646 times)

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I am not saying you have to stop illegally selling drugs, you do what you want to do. 

I just think for the sake of this forum, this thread should be closed because it could get the forum taken down/seized/blocked in the US, if a DEA agent didn't like what he saw.

I fail to see how letting the drug dealer stay on his corner is benefiting the forum community in comparison with the liability that comes with it.

Can you quote some precedent to your proposed scenario?

flaxceed, sorry for derailing, but I stand in support of you.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
I am not saying you have to stop illegally selling drugs, you do what you want to do. 

I just think for the sake of this forum, this thread should be closed because it could get the forum taken down/seized/blocked in the US, if a DEA agent didn't like what he saw.

I fail to see how letting the drug dealer stay on his corner is benefiting the forum community in comparison with the liability that comes with it.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
There is a difference between a drug dealer and a pharmacist. Pharmacy has an independent code of ethics that actually has it's roots in Hellenistic Greece. That code of ethics is actually independent of any government.

I agree that medicine is in a sorry state in the 'developed world'. But the price difference is not likely to be solely attributed to current insurance practices.  Prices of most goods and services vary based the location. I'm sure that a house in suburban, USA would be a couple orders of magnitude cheaper in many other countries. Why should it be any different for medicine?

Because the internet.
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
Smickles I am a drug dealer.  So is your compounding pharmacist. 

I not only sell anabolic steroids but I recommend their use.  If your body is not producing enough testosterone and you feel 20 years older than you should, I would love to sell some to you!  I will also tell you the truth.  I think you need to keep a close eye on your blood pressure before you start injecting yourself with testosterone.  I think you need to get a lipid panel because testosterone can elevate your LDL and decrease your HDL levels.  I think you should keep an eye on your hair, because in some patients testosterone will increase the rate at which male pattern baldness is manifested.

I will go further.  I think if you have been working out in a gym religiously for a number of years, and you have excellent overall health and nutrition, you might benefit greatly from testosterone.  You should be at least 25 years old though.  Also you need to take this seriously and avoid all alcohol, get plenty of rest (8 hours is bare minimum) and eat very, very clean.  You should eat a lot of lean protein and avoid added salt and sugar.  You should get enough magnesium and fiber from green leafy vegetables, and good fats from avocados, nuts, and extra virgin olive oil. 

Many people are confused about anabolic steroids.  They don't know what they are or what they do, they just know that all they hear is BAD.  But the medical establishment is not being honest.  If you open a package of testoviron from Schering Plough in Germany (earlier pages in this thread have pictures) you will get a complete leaflet for the consumer.  It tells you that this product will not enhance athletic performance.  The PDR (physician's desk reference) says the same thing.  What's wrong with this picture?  Every major professional sport bans testosterone because it is cheating.  I use it myself, and let me tell you- it is cheating!  I have substantially more muscle mass and strength than I would without testosterone.  My customers know this, and Ben Johnson and Marion Jones and Barry Bonds know that anabolic steroids work.  So why all the lies?  Why tell clearly transparent lies?

I do not understand modern medicine as practiced in developed nations.  To me it seems like a shell game with the patient as the loser.  I don't think that anyone needs a doctor for an antibiotic.  In the developing world we go to the pharmacy and get what we need.  I have a good friend who pays his own health insurance in the West and it is over $500 per month.  He is male and under 50 years old with no health problems.  I have had an MRI and surgery for this amount of money in the developing world.  With medications I was near $600 total.  What is wrong with this picture?  When is it enough?




sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250


No, you often watch a guy mix together things manufactured elsewhere...you aren't going to win this one.
See, this is a good part of why it's frustrating. You think this is about winning. I express a sentiment, then, it seems, posit an incorrect statement. flaxceed call me racist after I did that before.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
My customers were labeled as ignorant because they don't personally inspect the plant where these products are manufactured.  I think before you take a drug, you don't either.  If this isn't a racism issue, what is your reasoning?  Just explain yourself Smickles.  Nobody on this thread sought you out; you came here with your judgmental and self-righteous comments.  The least you can do is put together a well-reasoned argument to defend your position.

As a country "develops" people lose freedom.  If you travel a bit to third-world and developing countries you begin to see that government is intrinsically oppressive.  The richer and more powerful a government gets the more rules it imposes and the less freedom people have.  My business bridges the gap between the freedoms enjoyed in the developing world and the needs of people in the developed world.  What you are actually protesting is freedom.  You feel a personal affront because your government's power is threatened.  Your government LOVES you.  You are exactly what they want and need to maintain control and limit freedoms.
Ok, maybe I just came in at the wrong time. When I first looked at your thread I saw:

ROFLMAO and LOL s

stuff concerning anabolic steroids and Valium.

Quite frankly, after seeing those three things, you came off as a 'drug dealer' rather than a 'pharmacist' (if you get my dichotomy there). I felt unsettled after seen that stuff and wanted to express that. 

Jeez, this is frustrating.

I prefer to get my drugs at a compounding pharmacist, so basically, yeah I often watch them manufacture my drugs.

No, you often watch a guy mix together things manufactured elsewhere...you aren't going to win this one.
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
My customers were labeled as ignorant because they don't personally inspect the plant where these products are manufactured.  I think before you take a drug, you don't either.  If this isn't a racism issue, what is your reasoning?  Just explain yourself Smickles.  Nobody on this thread sought you out; you came here with your judgmental and self-righteous comments.  The least you can do is put together a well-reasoned argument to defend your position.

As a country "develops" people lose freedom.  If you travel a bit to third-world and developing countries you begin to see that government is intrinsically oppressive.  The richer and more powerful a government gets the more rules it imposes and the less freedom people have.  My business bridges the gap between the freedoms enjoyed in the developing world and the needs of people in the developed world.  What you are actually protesting is freedom.  You feel a personal affront because your government's power is threatened.  Your government LOVES you.  You are exactly what they want and need to maintain control and limit freedoms.
Ok, maybe I just came in at the wrong time. When I first looked at your thread I saw:

ROFLMAO and LOL s

stuff concerning anabolic steroids and Valium.

Quite frankly, after seeing those three things, you came off as a 'drug dealer' rather than a 'pharmacist' (if you get my dichotomy there). I felt unsettled after seen that stuff and wanted to express that. 

Jeez, this is frustrating.

I prefer to get my drugs at a compounding pharmacist, so basically, yeah I often watch them manufacture my drugs.
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
My customers were labeled as ignorant because they don't personally inspect the plant where these products are manufactured.  I think before you take a drug, you don't either.  If this isn't a racism issue, what is your reasoning?  Just explain yourself Smickles.  Nobody on this thread sought you out; you came here with your judgmental and self-righteous comments.  The least you can do is put together a well-reasoned argument to defend your position.

As a country "develops" people lose freedom.  If you travel a bit to third-world and developing countries you begin to see that government is intrinsically oppressive.  The richer and more powerful a government gets the more rules it imposes and the less freedom people have.  My business bridges the gap between the freedoms enjoyed in the developing world and the needs of people in the developed world.  What you are actually protesting is freedom.  You feel a personal affront because your government's power is threatened.  Your government LOVES you.  You are exactly what they want and need to maintain control and limit freedoms.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Smickles you should speak only for yourself.  Perhaps you are ignorant, but my customers are not.  They take time to understand the drugs they use and unlike big pharma they can make decisions based upon their own interests.
Don't expect me to post much more in this thread, if at all.
yeah, I guess that comes off as "free reign to call this guy a racist".
I feel compelled to defend myself here now.

I don't have good reason to think that I know where your drugs come from, that's the point. At least with J&J, someone found out about it. So I dispute your baseless claim of racism.

also, in this context, bringing up J&J is a good example of the cherry picking fallacy.

You should research what you argue...the vast majority of flaxceed's wares carry tamper-proof holograms bearing individual serial numbers to validate the manufacturer and quality of the product. There is also an overwhelming amount of consumer information available on forums from people who actively use the products.

Just because you are ignorant doesn't mean the rest of the world is.
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
Smickles you should speak only for yourself.  Perhaps you are ignorant, but my customers are not.  They take time to understand the drugs they use and unlike big pharma they can make decisions based upon their own interests.
Don't expect me to post much more in this thread, if at all.
yeah, I guess that comes off as "free reign to call this guy a racist".
I feel compelled to defend myself here now.

I don't have good reason to think that I know where your drugs come from, that's the point. At least with J&J, someone found out about it. So I dispute your baseless claim of racism.

also, in this context, bringing up J&J is a good example of the cherry picking fallacy.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Posts: 69
flaxceed does not seem to be "advertising" his wares any differently then how any of these other medicines are marketed.   Except, he is keeping it in one thread, he is not buying ad spots to the general stupid public that has no need for these medicines, there is no 3 seconds of jibberish of side effects here because we are all online looking at this thread through a web browser that gives the ability to fully research things yourself.   Still, he is here in this thread replying away to any concern as they come, despite the only thing that seems to be hated on, is the fact that he doesn't fear the results of other peoples ignorance as much everyone else.

Thank you flaxceed for allowing people to make their own decisions, whether they are informed or non-informed decisions, that is definitely up to the person, not you, good services, I hope competition springs up just so haters won't focus on you, but rather the fucked up laws and regulations in the US and elsewhere, where services like yours become necessary.
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
And Johnson and Johnson has been running really clean manufacturing, right?  Or you haven't followed that story?  There is an amazing amount of racism in your comments.  White people (or maybe you mean Westerners) can run a good, safe drug manufacturing facility but Asians can't?  Is that your assumption?

And before you take a pill, you go and inspect the plant where it was made?  You are a real piece of work.

Thanks for tolerating my presence.  That was weighing heavily on me.
   
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
Smickles you should speak only for yourself.  Perhaps you are ignorant, but my customers are not.  They take time to understand the drugs they use and unlike big pharma they can make decisions based upon their own interests.
I seriously doubt that any effort is made by your customers to inspect the manufacturing facilities of the drugs you propagate, thus, ignorant.

Any way, I've said my part. I don't expect you to change your ways and I'm willing to tolerate your presence. I just wanted to express my opinion on the matter. Don't expect me to post much more in this thread, if at all.
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
I don't think direct-to-consumer marketing has any place in the pharmaceutical business in legal or grey markets.  What you are doing just as, if not more, irresponsible than big pharma.  You are damning yourself along with the big guys.

Also, are you either located in the US or New Zealand, or did you just acknowledge you are breaking the law be engaging in DTC advertising?

Moderators: you know this forum could get shut down if it is seen as an promoting or enabling illegal black-market drug sales, right?


A little bit of freedom is a scary thing, isn't it RaggedMonk?  If you feel so strongly that the laws are protecting you and your fellow citizens then follow them.  Not everyone is convinced that the government and big business are acting in their best interest.  So, you've bought into the argument- and that's fine.  But don't condemn people who think for themselves.




sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
Smickles you should speak only for yourself.  Perhaps you are ignorant, but my customers are not.  They take time to understand the drugs they use and unlike big pharma they can make decisions based upon their own interests.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
"You aren't selling to people who need it, you are advertising the benefits to make people feel they need these drugs."

We should thank God that GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer don't do this!  Oh, wait- let me turn down the TV...darn drug commercials are too loud!!!

ROFLMAO.  This, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call a hypocrite.  They love the system that pours billions of dollars into drug executive's pockets because it is "safe" and they hate what I do because it is "dangerous". 

Interesting tidbit:  The United States and New Zealand are the only two countries where direct to consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs is legal.

I don't think direct-to-consumer marketing has any place in the pharmaceutical business in legal or grey markets.  What you are doing just as, if not more, irresponsible than big pharma.  You are damning yourself along with the big guys.

Also, are you either located in the US or New Zealand, or did you just acknowledge you are breaking the law be engaging in DTC advertising?

Moderators: you know this forum could get shut down if it is seen as an promoting or enabling illegal black-market drug sales, right?
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
Smickles perhaps you want to step up to the plate to discuss the issues.
Was I unclear?
I think pharmacy should be a serious business because it, more than most professions, involves risk of harm to its (often ignorant) customers.

It is disconcerting to see a pharmacist acting in this manner.
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
>>Note new email [email protected]<<
Smickles perhaps you want to step up to the plate to discuss the issues.
sr. member
Activity: 446
Merit: 250
"You aren't selling to people who need it, you are advertising the benefits to make people feel they need these drugs."

We should thank God that GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer don't do this!  Oh, wait- let me turn down the TV...darn drug commercials are too loud!!!

ROFLMAO.  This, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call a hypocrite.  They love the system that pours billions of dollars into drug executive's pockets because it is "safe" and they hate what I do because it is "dangerous". 

Interesting tidbit:  The United States and New Zealand are the only two countries where direct to consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs is legal.


Personally, I don't think ROFLMAO -or earlier, LOL- have any place in medicine, pharmacy, or health professions in general.
Pages:
Jump to: