Pages:
Author

Topic: Vanity Pool - vanity address generator pool - page 17. (Read 148044 times)

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
Does the solved work have to be case sensitive? I searched the thread for "case" and didn't find anything. For example, right now the first in available work is 1111Wish, does it have to be exactly that, or perhaps 1111WiSH, 1111WisH, 1111wish, or one of the many others? If not, then I believe the pool should have an option for the user who is requesting the address to be case sensitive or not. This would promote a few more sales.

The solution is case sensitive as properly charging for regexp work is a bit too complex for me to implement at the moment.
Case insensitivity does not require regex and the difficulty calculation is fairly simple.
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 313
Does the solved work have to be case sensitive? I searched the thread for "case" and didn't find anything. For example, right now the first in available work is 1111Wish, does it have to be exactly that, or perhaps 1111WiSH, 1111WisH, 1111wish, or one of the many others? If not, then I believe the pool should have an option for the user who is requesting the address to be case sensitive or not. This would promote a few more sales.

The solution is case sensitive as properly charging for regexp work is a bit too complex for me to implement at the moment.
legendary
Activity: 978
Merit: 1001
Does the solved work have to be case sensitive? I searched the thread for "case" and didn't find anything. For example, right now the first in available work is 1111Wish, does it have to be exactly that, or perhaps 1111WiSH, 1111WisH, 1111wish, or one of the many others? If not, then I believe the pool should have an option for the user who is requesting the address to be case sensitive or not. This would promote a few more sales.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
hi, when I check the solution - including old ones that I know are correct, on https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum site I have been getting an error message for the last 12 hrs plus:

Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.

If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this error message and the query that caused it.

... any help welcomed pse, ty!



I'm getting this error too, both when submitting via vanityminer and on the website. When doing the latter, sometimes I can get 'Solution does not match the pattern'. I was working on the 1arieLh pattern, if you are able to look at logs and figure out what is going on.
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
I forgot to mention the https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum site has been working fine when I tested it with some old solved van gens. I assumed with ASICs arriving that there may be more miners solving these but seems to have gone quiet atm results wise, maybe they're all mining Litecoins or something.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
After further investigation I've decided it's safe to download & have, but am unable to unarchive/extract the BtcAddress.exe on my Mac, seems that it's a for Windows only program which i don't use. Any help in getting the https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum sites working or who to ask would be appreciated, thanks.

What about https://www.bitaddress.org/ -> Vanity Wallet tab?  I haven't personally used it, but it seems pretty straightforward and bitaddress.org has been trustworthy and pretty solid.  It seems this pool uses EC Addition to derive the key, but on that you could just choose whichever option gives you the vanity address you expected.
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
After further investigation I've decided it's safe to download & have, but am unable to unarchive/extract the BtcAddress.exe on my Mac, seems that it's a for Windows only program which i don't use. Any help in getting the https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum sites working or who to ask would be appreciated, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
I don't download stuff... I am geek lvl 0.
Not downloading stuff puts you in the 90th percentile or better already Roll Eyes
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
Many thanks, but unfortunately that's way out of my league for using, I don't use windows & though I trust Casascius I don't download stuff & I just don't know enough to be sure that I'm not exposing my part of the private key to attempt this, I am geek lvl 0.

It does look very useful though & if I get a separate computer in the future from the one where I log on to stuff then I will experiment with it.
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
hi, when I check the solution - including old ones that I know are correct, on https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum site I have been getting an error message for the last 12 hrs plus:

Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.

If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this error message and the query that caused it.

... any help welcomed pse, ty!

Have you tried the bitcoin address utility?

https://github.com/casascius/Bitcoin-Address-Utility

http://casascius.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/bitcoin-address-utility/
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
hi, when I check the solution - including old ones that I know are correct, on https://gobittest.appspot.com/VanityMult & sum site I have been getting an error message for the last 12 hrs plus:

Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.

If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this error message and the query that caused it.

... any help welcomed pse, ty!

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
This really should be used more. Quite a brilliant idea.
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
Changed to 5 minutes. Didn't think it could generate any meaningful load, sorry.

I should probably make the computations myself from the published jobs, didn't find time to do it yet.

Thanks, and no, it didn't generate any meaningful load, but did fill up my logs with a lot of requests. Smiley Mostly, I wanted you to know that it wasn't helping you to grab it more often because of the caching on my end!
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Changed to 5 minutes. Didn't think it could generate any meaningful load, sorry.

I should probably make the computations myself from the published jobs, didn't find time to do it yet.
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
It looks like someone is hammering my vanitypool-value API every 30 seconds with a Ruby script. The API is cached for 5 minutes, so you aren't actually gaining anything from pinging it so often. Would you please reduce the frequency to closer to 5 minutes?

The IP address of the requests starts is 82.

Thanks!
donator
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1167
Any chance of a LTC Van addie gen service - I would be most interested if so.
full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
Well its like life a I guess, weigh the risk.

I want a cool bitcoin address, but I just want it to happen without doing anything and no risk. No cool bitcoin address for you.

Or I want a cool bitcoin address, I could use the website developed or software developed by the funding a long time forum/community member has provided.
eg the windows key  manager
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-cancelled-6btc-split-key-vanity-address-management-software-117050

Yes, there is risk he could grab my private key so its not something I would use for large transactions and transfer the bitcoins out of it regularly.

Not happy with the risk then, what can I do to mitigate it? double check the code. It is there for both the windows app and keyconv and compile it.

Dont want to take those steps or take the risk, no cool bitcoin address for you.

And the risk would still be there even if keyconv was pre-compiled.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0

 ./vanitygen -P 041d2e778ae6d9124736df131cd22d3a2483f336c55156d87a84c4bdc6d89f8518e33de85ae0f90 7a7128c476281bc8cc7742b43a54ccc2c7824dc4c4a438a7fbc 1Boat

Imagine following scenario:

1. I want a cool  bitcoin address, e.g. "1ockHard.... "
2. The first question i am asked by the pool: "Your public key:". And there is no indication where can I get this "my public key" from.
3. After a research on some shady forum I get two options to generate a private/public pair:
   3.1 http://gobittest.appspot.com/ Which is obviously wrong because everyone know that one should not disclosure private key. So no online generator for private keys allowed!
   3.2 a command line  utility  "keyconv -G"  is mentioned as an alternative. But as far as I understand the utility is available only as a source code, no windows .exe or GUI. Therefore, one need a compiler and perl (for openssl compilation) installed, just to order an address..






 

full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100

==== The pool  =======

0) offline generation of private/public key for a customer.  There is no official link to  keyconv binary for Windows on the main page.


Do you mean work off the website or private work of your own direct to customers?

If its work of the website you dont need keyconv, just use the -P option on the command line. Click on the link for the name they want generated copy and past the public key and the name they want generated into the command.

eg

vanitygen -P publickey nametheywantgenerated

 ./vanitygen -P 041d2e778ae6d9124736df131cd22d3a2483f336c55156d87a84c4bdc6d89f8518e33de85ae0f90 7a7128c476281bc8cc7742b43a54ccc2c7824dc4c4a438a7fbc 1Boat


This works for oclvanity gen as well even though the -P isnt shown in the programs help output.
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
There is one thing I do not understand:
Why isn't this vanity miner testing all available works at once? I thought the slowest part in this process is crypting/hashing, so testing result against hundreds/thousands/milions of adresses should not be that big deal (if some smart datastructure like trie would be used...).
Am I wrong?

You can only test concurrently any available work that has the same public key when it was requested.

eg my pub key is A & I request vans:

b, c, d, e, f

all these can be tested or searched for together, as my private key to A gives me the private key solution to them.

but someone else with pub key B requests van gens;

g, h, i

these can't be searched for at the same time as mine as it's a different pub key & hence priv key needed to see/de-crypt the solution.

(A non tech attempt at explanation as I see it - I'm geek lvl @ minus 10 btw, as I'm sure is evident)



You could actually work on all requests at once, if you would be creating simple pubkey-privkey pairs. Once you find one, you give the pubkey and privkey to the requester. Of course there is no guarantee you delete the privkey, so you could steal any funds sent to that address. Or someone steals the privkey from your harddrive, etc.
The beauty in the system here is that you kind of create a pubkey corresponding to a privkey you don't know, but the requester can calculate once he receives your solution. That way only the requester ever has the privkey.
..with the limitation that you can only work on requests from the same, well, confusing, pubkey used to create the request :-)

Either way, would it do any good if we could work on all requests at once, if the securityproblem wasn't there? I am sure people would still offer as little reward as possible. Then you wouldn't earn a few bitcents for a task, but a few bitcents for all requests combined. Regular mining would still be more profitable. Sure, the minimum reward could be adjusted? Same could be done here. So, short answer: Free market and supply&demand. :-)

Ente
Pages:
Jump to: