Let us therefore re-examine the following points from Op;
- Op claimed that rule 2.1 was not in the ToS when he registered although he might not have evidence
- Op said that the rule of Rusia restriction is only available in the English version. This shows that the edit was hastily done
- Another factor for determination is if Russia IP was blocked in the site and Op used VPN. If this is so, Op could be at fault, especially if there is a rule not to conceal IP
- Op, consider to use a legal means if you are sure you didn't default no 3. I am sure Russia blocks access to certain websites and vice versa
100% he has a case.
The last proof he needed was them adding the Russian version of the updated term to their TOS.
Why else would they do this right after this incident if not recognizing they made a huge mistake, which they truely did.
This practice it very shady and deserves more light.
They are basically freerolling this customer, not more and not less.
At least they are kind of represented in our forum, this topic has be brought up in their ANN already. Their reply was only:
Please note that any kind of sports betting or live betting for players from Russia is strictly prohibited and it's a requirement of our licensee. Also, we reserve the right to confiscate funds and block an account if it is proven that sports betting was made by a Russian citizen.
https://vave.com/information/terms-and-conditions
Thank you.
Kind of ridiculous.