Topic: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer - page 637. (Read 1232701 times)

All right. Thank you. I received the following information:
22:53:49       getpeerinfo

22:53:49       [
{
"addr" : "5.135.140.184:5889",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390163948,
"lastrecv" : 1390168423,
"bytessent" : 126,
"bytesrecv" : 5303,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390163948,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "192.241.125.216:5889",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390164765,
"lastrecv" : 1390168423,
"bytessent" : 126,
"bytesrecv" : 4537,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390164765,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "54.197.230.111:5889",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390167640,
"lastrecv" : 1390168429,
"bytessent" : 126,
"bytesrecv" : 455,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390167640,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "23.83.200.162:5889",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390168159,
"lastrecv" : 1390168424,
"bytessent" : 126,
"bytesrecv" : 327,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390168159,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.106.121.125:5889",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1390168308,
"lastrecv" : 1390168424,
"bytessent" : 126,
"bytesrecv" : 211,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390168308,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

I am rebooted the computer and wallet. After that, I re-started Vertcoin CGMinerAleksNR3. I'm going tonight to see what happens. If still be problems I'll come back an older version of a wallet. I'll let you know when solve (if I solve) the problem.

Ok yes, it looks like the first one is not connected to peers. You see it says "has not been successfully broadcast yet".

Do you definitely have peers connected?

I am not solomining (not enough hashrate) in the wallet, so cannot test. Nothing changed between the two wallet releases though other than.

1. DNS seeds were updated to help get wallet synced without adding nodes
2. UPNP was built in to increase number of nodes available to connect to a sync the blockchain

Other than that, nothing else changed in the code, so I am at a loss to know why the new wallet would be behaving differently when solomining. If you want to keep solomining, perhaps you could move back to the old wallet version which is still at http://sdrv.ms/1esmm4H but I actually think there is no reason the new wallet would be doing anything different regarding solomining.

I also just checked some of my own solomined blocks (from day 1) in both the old and new wallets and they look exactly the same. Of course, I haven't tried generating any new solomined blocks in the new wallet, but it does sync OK for me and finds peers.

Please check your peers (either just look at the connected peers in the gui, or do getpeerinfo in the debug console). Sometimes, I've had wallets fail to sync and just closing and reopening them has fixed it?

 For some reason, the image will not be displayed in full size. Here's the links for pictures:
1. https://imageshack.com/i/3ofwgip
2. https://imageshack.com/i/f7qi5dp

Thanks for sharing your wisdom. Perhaps next time in a normal font size and color? I took the liberty to make that change in your quote.

Lucky-Luciano can you post those pictures bigger please, I cannot see them and can't click them to enlarge.

Do these mined blocks not show in your balance on the overview page?

EDIT: I just noticed, in the first image, if I can make it out correctly in the small image, it looks like these blocks have no been broadcast to the network. Are you sure you are properly connected with peers?

         Yes, I solo miner. Maybe it's something else.

This is a picture of the transaction in a new wallet:
 


All transactions with the question mark had a "clock" confirmations as the last transaction. However, at some point the clock is changed to a question mark.

This is a picture of the transaction in the old wallet:

Is Adaptive N-factor really the way to stop ASICs? Or to make CPU-mining more profitable over time??? I don't think so, hardware changes over time, gets bigger, and the base code of this coin doesn't.

 

Those are solomined blocks right?

In which case, I am presuming they might not be confirmed yet. They are unspendable until they are 120 blocks deep in the blockchain.

Yes that would make sense. IMO the bitcrush operator should have self moderated already and temporarily closed registrations to prevent having too high a proportion of the hashrate. That's probably why it is unlisted for the time being.

After upgrading wallets I have a problem with the transactions. The transaction matures and then appear questionnaire.

https://imageshack.com/i/3uka59p

The largest, http://vert.bitcrush.info. I assumed that this omission was intentional to protect the coin.

vertcoin goin to mars!

Ah OK are you aware what is not listed?

Everyone keep voting at https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/64057/ if you'd like to trade VTC at Cryptsy.

Not all pools are listed...

whats going on everyone

just wanted to to let you know   we have updated the website www.vertcoin.org

things are starting to pick up and the network rate is growing daily


IRC FREENODE #vertcoin stop in and say hi



also www.coinedup.com to buy VTC or trade

Thanks. Lots of activity in IRC today - come join us in #vertcoin on freenode.

done 

Build HOWTO for the modded cgminer updated on the website. If anyone has built vertminer successfully on ubuntu 13.10 or derivatives, please post your differences from the published howto which applies to 12.04

A heads up for you all - coinmarket.io are looking for suggestion of coins to add at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pre-poll-trading-pair-suggestions-for-coinmarketio-422726 I figured some of you might like to join me in suggesting LTC and BTC pairs with VTC.