Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer - page 652.

veebee

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 12:49:02 PM

I sent 500 VRT to 0daycoins about an hour ago and it still hasn't shown up in my account. 31 confirmations. *Really* hoping my coins aren't lost

try going to where you wanted to sell them and look, i had a similar issue yesterday. the coins didnt show up under deposit but they did where i wanted to sell them

BorisTheSpider

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 12:49:02 PM

I sent 500 VRT to 0daycoins about an hour ago and it still hasn't shown up in my account. 31 confirmations. *Really* hoping my coins aren't lost

Damn. What address? Have you checked http://explorer.vertcoin.org/

Bufius

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

Quote from: CryptoAddict on January 14, 2014, 10:16:57 AM

I just get lots of HW errors when i use this modified CGminer. No accepts or rejects. 7950 gpu

please use this, its my config (also 7950 @ 1000/1500).
--thread-concurrency 19712 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 256 --gpu-threads 1

With setting i have now some HW errors, but only 3 for the last 48 hours (for me this is OK).

cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-01-12 19:12:53]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):595.2K (avg):557.9Kh/s | A:1320256 R:5504 HW:6 WU:515.4/m
ST: 4 SS: 6446 NB: 2284 LW: 101347 GF: 124 RF: 47
Connected to 192.168.100.170 diff 94.2K with LP as user vertcoin
Block: 9ef3e2ee... Diff:1 Started: [18:42:38] Best share: 1.88M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [ S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 1: 77.0C 2372RPM | 299.8K/279.5Kh/s | A:653586 R:2938 HW:3 WU:255.0/m I:20
GPU 2: 72.0C 2014RPM | 298.5K/278.4Kh/s | A:666670 R:2566 HW:3 WU:260.4/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

spiffcow

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

I sent 500 VRT to 0daycoins about an hour ago and it still hasn't shown up in my account. 31 confirmations. *Really* hoping my coins aren't lost

blacklig

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 251

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 11:26:17 AM

Prices on 0daycoins are getting awful low.. This needs to hit a second exchange (coinedup maybe?) or this will set the standard for the value of this coin at a very low value..

look what happened to 42 coin...
it was sitting on like 40 btc per coin, then it hit cryptsy and look where is it now..
I dont understand that though.. perhaps massive pump and dump ?
This coin is way better as it is ASIC resistant..

x0rcist

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: aleks648 on January 14, 2014, 12:17:35 PM

Quote from: BorisTheSpider on January 14, 2014, 12:09:51 PM

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 03:27:02 AM

What's with all the pools? Massive DDoS attack? They all keep going down.

Yeah, are we being DDoS'd Huh

Someone wants to stop VTC... I guess we're getting some attention.

The main pools are being DDoS'd but yet the network hash is still really high, someone stopping pools to mine themselves?

yup looks like people are running private pools and dossing all main pools... guess this will be the main trend in the next month when new coins get released. time to switch pools to p2pool....

aleks648

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Bounty Manager

Quote from: BorisTheSpider on January 14, 2014, 12:09:51 PM

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 03:27:02 AM

What's with all the pools? Massive DDoS attack? They all keep going down.

Yeah, are we being DDoS'd Huh

Someone wants to stop VTC... I guess we're getting some attention.

The main pools are being DDoS'd but yet the network hash is still really high, someone stopping pools to mine themselves?

BorisTheSpider

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 11:26:17 AM

Prices on 0daycoins are getting awful low.. This needs to hit a second exchange (coinedup maybe?) or this will set the standard for the value of this coin at a very low value..

0.00006 seems cheap, but it's a new coin. It's pretty impressive to see support for such a new coin.

aleks648

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Bounty Manager

Yeah it seems so! Some folk out there jealous of a good launch!

BorisTheSpider

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 03:27:02 AM

What's with all the pools? Massive DDoS attack? They all keep going down.

Yeah, are we being DDoS'd Huh

Someone wants to stop VTC... I guess we're getting some attention.

GreekBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

getmonero.org

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 11:26:17 AM

Prices on 0daycoins are getting awful low.. This needs to hit a second exchange (coinedup maybe?) or this will set the standard for the value of this coin at a very low value..

No, coin needs spam Tongue

spiffcow

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Prices on 0daycoins are getting awful low.. This needs to hit a second exchange (coinedup maybe?) or this will set the standard for the value of this coin at a very low value..

aleks648

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Bounty Manager

Quote from: spiffcow on January 14, 2014, 03:27:02 AM

What's with all the pools? Massive DDoS attack? They all keep going down.

The issue with the pool is people using an unmodified CGMiner and connecting to stratum. All the rejected shares mess with stratum.

aleks648

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Bounty Manager

You probably need to reduce your thread concurrency.

CryptoAddict

member

Activity: 115

Merit: 10

I just get lots of HW errors when i use this modified CGminer. No accepts or rejects. 7950 gpu

Cryptomancer

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: BorisTheSpider on January 14, 2014, 12:31:28 AM

Quote from: dE_logics on January 14, 2014, 12:29:15 AM

So if N factor reaches from 24 to 25, there'll be no rig which can mine this coin anymore, and the block chain will HALT.

In the year 2694?

I think CPUs and even GPUs might have advanced a bit by then...

And in 2694 this coin will obviously still exist and people will still use it! Grin

Edit: By the way, anyone working on cudaminer? I would love to mine faster that 2.7k on my CPU Grin

add1ct3dd

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 270

What version of stratum-mining do we need for the pool?

I can get a reliable pool up but need the correct stratum version

.

madjihad

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 260

Quote from: Bufius on January 14, 2014, 07:09:59 AM

Quote from: madjihad on January 14, 2014, 06:00:16 AM

Yes, just compiled it, and replaced inside the cgiminer. And I don't have installed version, so it's impossible to strart it without ./ Will try on another system later on. And will re-check everything once again.

sorry, i do not really understand what you mean with "replaced inside the cgminer".
Have you downloaded the GPU cgminer from page 1 and compiled this?
Or do you use the sources from original cgminer and only replaced the scrpt130511.cl? (this is not enough, ocl.c and scrypt.c are changed too)

Yes, I've downloaded it from the 1st page. And the hashrate is close to 50% of original scrypt, so it should be proper setup. If no one seen it before, probably it something wrong with my system. Will dig more around today...

Bufius

newbie

Activity: 46

Merit: 0

Quote from: madjihad on January 14, 2014, 06:00:16 AM

Yes, just compiled it, and replaced inside the cgiminer. And I don't have installed version, so it's impossible to strart it without ./ Will try on another system later on. And will re-check everything once again.

sorry, i do not really understand what you mean with "replaced inside the cgminer".
Have you downloaded the GPU cgminer from page 1 and compiled this?
Or do you use the sources from original cgminer and only replaced the scrpt130511.cl? (this is not enough, ocl.c and scrypt.c are changed too)

madjihad

full member

Activity: 227

Merit: 260

Quote from: Bufius on January 14, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

Quote from: madjihad on January 14, 2014, 05:04:02 AM

Thanks, but it didn't help Sad

Probably something wrong with my version of kernel itself. Got it from the link on a first page, strange. Using 7870, and as it based on the same GNC architecture as 7950/70 and R9 xxx the same OpenCL kernel should work for it as well.

you have compiled the sources and not installed the binary with make install, right? (thats OK, otherwise you overwrite your installed scrypt cgminer)
If yes, please start cgminer from the source dir with ./cgminer!
./ is really important to start the one from the source dir, not the installed one.
I have done this mistake too during my very firsts tests Wink

Yes, just compiled it, and replaced inside the cgiminer. And I don't have installed version, so it's impossible to strart it without ./ Will try on another system later on. And will re-check everything once again.

Topic: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer - page 652. (Read 1232701 times)