VLT | Veltor | Donar Network | Minimalism. - page 27.

khodakarami

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: rowenta01 on March 06, 2017, 04:49:38 AM

Hey guys,

When I want to download the wallet on the site, the link does not work ..

On the link of the first page of bitcointakl, I can actually download the windows wallet, but I have no connection with the network and therefore no synchronization ..

Can anyone help me?

Open your wallet, go to "help" then "console" and type the following:
addnode veltor.suprnova.cc add

Then hit enter.

Do the same for the following:

addnode 2a01:4f8:201:6211::2101 add
addnode 78.94.32.195 add
addnode 2001:41d0:8:250e:: add
addnode 178.33.228.14 add
addnode 144.76.237.39 add

You should be connected to the network after that.

not sure why it's not working for me?
http://prntscr.com/eh9umm

and I see this in the log file :

Code:

2017-03-07 21:52:23 Opened LevelDB successfully
2017-03-07 21:52:23 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file = 0
2017-03-07 21:52:23 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=1, size=266, heights=0...0, time=2016-08-12...2016-08-12)
2017-03-07 21:52:23 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
2017-03-07 21:52:23 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=0000066a08258414a35dd520b504fd541fde99b5bebff6a069c438667e7f44cd height=0 date=2016-08-12 13:47:10
2017-03-07 21:52:23 init message: Verifying blocks...
2017-03-07 21:52:23 block index 50ms
2017-03-07 21:52:23 init message: Loading wallet...
2017-03-07 21:52:24 nFileVersion = 1000101
2017-03-07 21:52:24 wallet 544ms
2017-03-07 21:52:24 init message: Loading addresses...
2017-03-07 21:52:24 Loaded 3 addresses from peers.dat 0ms
2017-03-07 21:52:24 mapBlockIndex.size() = 1
2017-03-07 21:52:24 nBestHeight = 0
2017-03-07 21:52:24 setKeyPool.size() = 100
2017-03-07 21:52:24 mapWallet.size() = 0
2017-03-07 21:52:24 mapAddressBook.size() = 1
2017-03-07 21:52:24 dnsseed thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 net thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 addcon thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 opencon thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 msghand thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while)
2017-03-07 21:52:24 dumpaddr thread start
2017-03-07 21:52:24 init message: Done loading
2017-03-07 21:52:24 3 addresses found from DNS seeds
2017-03-07 21:52:24 dnsseed thread exit
2017-03-07 21:52:24 refreshWallet
2017-03-07 21:52:25 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:29 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:29 ERROR: GetMyExternalIP() : connection to 91.198.22.70:80 failed
2017-03-07 21:52:30 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:30 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:31 GetMyExternalIP() received [] [::]:0
2017-03-07 21:52:35 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:35 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=95.9hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:36 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:36 ERROR: GetMyExternalIP() : connection to 216.146.43.70:80 failed
2017-03-07 21:52:40 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:41 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:42 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:42 ERROR: GetMyExternalIP() : connection to 212.117.175.194:80 failed
2017-03-07 21:52:46 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:46 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:51 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:52 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.7hrs
2017-03-07 21:52:57 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:52:57 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:02 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:03 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.7hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:08 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:08 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:13 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:14 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:19 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:19 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.7hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:24 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:25 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:30 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:30 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:35 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:36 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:41 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:41 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:46 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:47 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:52 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:52 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:53:57 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:53:58 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:03 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:03 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:08 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:09 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:14 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:14 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:19 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:20 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:24 trying connection 178.33.228.14:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:25 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:25 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.8hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:29 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:29 trying connection [2a01:4f8:201:6211::2101]:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:30 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:31 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:34 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:35 trying connection 78.94.32.195:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:36 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:36 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:40 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:40 trying connection [2001:41d0:8:250e::]:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:41 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:42 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:45 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:46 trying connection 178.33.228.14:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:47 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:47 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.2hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:51 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:51 trying connection 144.76.237.39:31415 lastseen=385812.1hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:52 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:53 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:54:56 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:58 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:54:58 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:03 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:04 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.3hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:09 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:09 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.3hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:14 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:15 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.8hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:20 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:20 trying connection 46.105.114.185:31415 lastseen=118.8hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:25 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:26 trying connection 45.32.236.94:31415 lastseen=76.3hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:31 connection timeout
2017-03-07 21:55:31 trying connection 161.53.40.94:31415 lastseen=96.0hrs
2017-03-07 21:55:36 connection timeout

rowenta01

sr. member

Activity: 1216

Merit: 333

I find the configuration a bit complicated for noobs.

But thank you, it works now! Wink

rowenta01

sr. member

Activity: 1216

Merit: 333

Hey guys,

When I want to download the wallet on the site, the link does not work ..

On the link of the first page of bitcointakl, I can actually download the windows wallet, but I have no connection with the network and therefore no synchronization ..

Can anyone help me?

Stenull

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Quote from: Kunfu on March 06, 2017, 12:49:42 AM

Hi, is there something wrong with the chain? my wallet is synced uptodate but main explorer not shown most recent transaction.. any idea?

Main explorer is crap and have not been working for a long time now.
Mr Veltor is working on a new one. In the meantime use this one http://yiimp.ccminer.org/explorer/VLT

Kunfu

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 100

Hi, is there something wrong with the chain? my wallet is synced uptodate but main explorer not shown most recent transaction.. any idea?

ICOcountdown.com

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 500

Quote from: jasonv75 on March 05, 2017, 08:23:35 AM

Sunday update:

The Bitcoin fee market has been behaving in an interesting manner this week, reinforcing my beliefs that Veltor is the only answer to Bitcoin's problem.

The miners are becoming dependent on increasing transaction fees caused by the scarcity of block space. It is in their best interest to keep the availability of block size limited to safeguard their income stream. Scaling rapidly, either by increasing the block size significantly or by voting for segregated witness to allow the implementation of the lightning network, would undermine their economic objectives.

This is in stark contrast with Bitcoin as a technology platform, which needs to innovate and be widely adopted in order to ensure continued success. New users want to enter the market and use Bitcoin as a transaction medium, but are kept out by extreme fee increases. No matter how high the fees will rise, the maximum in capacity will not change and so there is no mechanism to release the pressure on the fee market.

In order for the lightning network to be possible, segregated witness needs to be adopted with a miner consensus of 95%. The way the current incentives are setup, the soft fork will fail and the lightning network will never happen. User participation will stagnate and Bitcoin will further fall behind the innovation of its competitors.

The solution is Veltor with its native Donar Network, where lightning transactions will be the default and the market won't be allowed to develop into such a death spiral of competing economic incentives.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Quote by R. Buckminster Fuller

Furthermore, a Veltor sub is now available on Reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Veltor/

J.V.

Interesting update hearing more and more about segwit, bitcoin unlimited(garbage) and lightning networks. I believe veltor has come at the right time Cheesy

jasonv75

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

I'm an artist, my paint is code

Sunday update:

The Bitcoin fee market has been behaving in an interesting manner this week, reinforcing my beliefs that Veltor is the only answer to Bitcoin's problem.

The miners are becoming dependent on increasing transaction fees caused by the scarcity of block space. It is in their best interest to keep the availability of block size limited to safeguard their income stream. Scaling rapidly, either by increasing the block size significantly or by voting for segregated witness to allow the implementation of the lightning network, would undermine their economic objectives.

This is in stark contrast with Bitcoin as a technology platform, which needs to innovate and be widely adopted in order to ensure continued success. New users want to enter the market and use Bitcoin as a transaction medium, but are kept out by extreme fee increases. No matter how high the fees will rise, the maximum in capacity will not change and so there is no mechanism to release the pressure on the fee market.

In order for the lightning network to be possible, segregated witness needs to be adopted with a miner consensus of 95%. The way the current incentives are setup, the soft fork will fail and the lightning network will never happen. User participation will stagnate and Bitcoin will further fall behind the innovation of its competitors.

The solution is Veltor with its native Donar Network, where lightning transactions will be the default and the market won't be allowed to develop into such a death spiral of competing economic incentives.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Quote by R. Buckminster Fuller

Furthermore, a Veltor sub is now available on Reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Veltor/

J.V.

ICOcountdown.com

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 500

Quote from: jasonv75 on February 26, 2017, 04:56:03 AM

Sunday update:

I have a feeling that people have become too emotional regarding my project. I am just going to say that I won't waste time arguing, I will spend it coding.

I will also use this opportunity to set the right expectations: the new Veltor client will not be released any time soon. I spent a lot of time designing the perfect blockchain for the lightning network. I always knew where I was going, I now know exactly how to get there. I will let the code do the talking.

On to the relevant stuff. The technical design of the Veltor blockchain is done. As the lightning network will be built into the blockchain, it is intrinsically superior to other approaches. It's not the lightning network anymore, it is something better. I decided to call it the Veltor Donar Network. There are a number of advantages that are only possible with native blockchain support:

J.V.

Cool update, eagerly awaiting the alpha Cheesy

jasonv75

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

I'm an artist, my paint is code

Sunday update:

I have a feeling that people have become too emotional regarding my project. I am just going to say that I won't waste time arguing, I will spend it coding.

I will also use this opportunity to set the right expectations: the new Veltor client will not be released any time soon. I spent a lot of time designing the perfect blockchain for the lightning network. I always knew where I was going, I now know exactly how to get there. I will let the code do the talking.

On to the relevant stuff. The technical design of the Veltor blockchain is done. As the lightning network will be built into the blockchain, it is intrinsically superior to other approaches. It's not the lightning network anymore, it is something better. I decided to call it the Veltor Donar Network. There are a number of advantages that are only possible with native blockchain support:

J.V.

SockPuppetAccount

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

MiG Messenger - earn while chatting

Quote from: statdude on February 25, 2017, 05:19:53 PM

So, wheres the explanation? Huh

If same private key was used twice, once on Vcash, that is definitely suspicious, no?

Yes, definitely suspicious but not conclusive. The way I see it is if this is J.C., the market on Yobit won't give a shit either way if J.V. actually delivers on what he has promised.

Full disclosure, I am holding 1900 VLT so maybe I just want to believe............

Stenull

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 500

Quote from: statdude on February 25, 2017, 05:19:53 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

xxx

So, wheres the explanation? Huh

If same private key was used twice, once on Vcash, that is definitely suspicious, no?

Oh well, even if its JC, you probably have a weak/lame pump coming before he dumps it -80%

I know things are hard for special people but try read this again

Quote from: awishformore

Since the prefix, hashing and address format is the same for Veltor and Vcash, an identical key obviously leads to an identical address.

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

xxx

So, wheres the explanation? Huh

If same private key was used twice, once on Vcash, that is definitely suspicious, no?

Oh well, even if its JC, you probably have a weak/lame pump coming before he dumps it -80%

iefken

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Live by your own rules

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: statdude on February 25, 2017, 02:44:31 PM

Quote from: jasonv75 on February 23, 2017, 06:28:59 PM

I don’t get what this drama is all about.
Everything has been explained.

Anyone in doubt at this stage should obviously not commit to the project until the new codebase is released.

J.V.

Wow, this reminds me of exactly J.C.'s style of dismissing any criticism.

Also the way the coin has been developed (extremely long accumulation period at next to 0 market cap) then pump is reminiscent of Vcash/Vanilla.

Also, he signs messages same way and both coins start with V.

Looks pretty damning from that perspective. I haven't seen any actual explanation either (typical for JC).

Good luck getting on Polo or anywhere legit if this is all true.

Wow, this reminds me of typical FUD coming from someone supporting a competing project in value exchange via off-chain state channel management.

Also the way it is one can tell.

Looks pretty damning from that perspective. I haven't seen any actual explanation either (typical FUD).

Good luck and may the better tech prevail.

Lol best answer ever, always funny to see people take so much time writing something that according to what they write is not worth the time... Somekind of a paradox or what do smart people call it

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jasonv75 on February 23, 2017, 06:28:59 PM

I don’t get what this drama is all about.
Everything has been explained.

Anyone in doubt at this stage should obviously not commit to the project until the new codebase is released.

J.V.

Wow, this reminds me of exactly J.C.'s style of dismissing any criticism.

Also the way the coin has been developed (extremely long accumulation period at next to 0 market cap) then pump is reminiscent of Vcash/Vanilla.

Also, he signs messages same way and both coins start with V.

Looks pretty damning from that perspective. I haven't seen any actual explanation either (typical for JC).

Good luck getting on Polo or anywhere legit if this is all true.

biggernugs

sr. member

Activity: 446

Merit: 250

Just a little advice, take it or not. Anyone falling into this fud or pump and dump drama and liquidating their coins is a fool. When the new codebase is released this will be one of the top projects to follow. DYOR and see. Play the swings, whatever. But if you doubt the legitimacy of this project then that's your choice. Those who stick around and back it will happy they did. This is one of only a few projects that have a new vision, not some shitcoin clone. Trading is about making money, but as BTC has just taught many sometimes holding long term is the better option. I know what I'm doing.

rudolsen

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: jasonv75 on February 23, 2017, 06:28:59 PM

Quote from: rudolsen on February 23, 2017, 04:31:05 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: EmilioMann on February 23, 2017, 08:14:54 AM

Hey ppl, unfortunately this is another JC aka John Connor aka Julian Cain scam.

Code:

https://explorer.vchain.info/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM
      http://veltor.org:8080/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM

I have no idea what you are talking about, but the explanation for the same address is simple. Somebody used the same private key on both chains. Since the prefix, hashing and address format is the same for Veltor and Vcash, an identical key obviously leads to an identical address.

thanks for the fast and only reasonable response.. he obviously misunderstood my "address collision" post on vcash slack (https://i.imgur.com/ag3KQ0L.png) and began to spread his truth

I don’t get what this drama is all about.
Everything has been explained.

Anyone in doubt at this stage should obviously not commit to the project until the new codebase is released.

J.V.

After all it looks like Suprnova pool "copy/paste" same "config" from Vcash and add proper address later or something like that (I'm not pool operator at all).
First and next mined blocks by the pool are 215+ to VsTVny...RaqdVr and previous 214 (just 4:35min before) to VmZkC4...mkwfgM which was also Suprnova address used in Vcash since block 72490 (BE link). Planet is safe now. If I'm wrong, you can PM me your story.

Spacemarko

full member

Activity: 184

Merit: 100

I have around 1200 VLT from old mining (virst week ater VLT started to main), should I change coins to new VLT version, how and where?

kapsel

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

Quote from: lyolyalya on February 22, 2017, 08:30:26 AM

Quote from: Mr. Net on February 22, 2017, 08:27:51 AM

Quote from: ICOcountdown.com on February 21, 2017, 09:44:55 PM

Quote from: Wasda on February 21, 2017, 09:12:55 PM

Hi, anyone know what is the estimate mining cost for 1 VLT as of right now?

I would be interested in knowing this too as currently only are few produced a day and the mining difficulty is increasing.

http://yiimp.ccminer.org/site/mining

0.04btc/MH/Day

10GH Is current Network

15*48 720 VLT a day.

Example: RX480 around 20MH at 150W

Example of price of electricity: 30cents$ kWh

20MH costs 4.5 cents/hour to operate.

20MH is 0.2% of the current network, meaning you get 0.2% of the reward.
Mining 2 blocks on average -> 30 VLT per hour
0.2% of 30 VLT is 0.06VLT

0.06 VLT is 0.042 Cents.

Mining 1 VLT costs 0.78 Cents at 30 Cents per kWh.

So, mine VLT if you have cheap electricity below 25 Cents per kWh, else... buy.

i have 1070 that gives me about 36-40 MHS at 150 W with 0.05$ per kWh so - i want to mine it=)

How do you reach 40mh/s with one 1070 ? What mining software and settings do you use ?

Hyperjacked

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1119

It's all mathematics...!

Quote from: jasonv75 on February 23, 2017, 06:28:59 PM

Quote from: rudolsen on February 23, 2017, 04:31:05 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: EmilioMann on February 23, 2017, 08:14:54 AM

Hey ppl, unfortunately this is another JC aka John Connor aka Julian Cain scam.

Code:

https://explorer.vchain.info/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM
      http://veltor.org:8080/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM

I have no idea what you are talking about, but the explanation for the same address is simple. Somebody used the same private key on both chains. Since the prefix, hashing and address format is the same for Veltor and Vcash, an identical key obviously leads to an identical address.

thanks for the fast and only reasonable response.. he obviously misunderstood my "address collision" post on vcash slack (https://i.imgur.com/ag3KQ0L.png) and began to spread his truth

I don’t get what this drama is all about.
Everything has been explained.

Anyone in doubt at this stage should obviously not commit to the project until the new codebase is released.

J.V.

Just drama no doubt... Emilio probably wants cheap Vlt or didn't do his DD

Maybe just Emilio being Emilio...

jasonv75

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

I'm an artist, my paint is code

Quote from: rudolsen on February 23, 2017, 04:31:05 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: EmilioMann on February 23, 2017, 08:14:54 AM

Hey ppl, unfortunately this is another JC aka John Connor aka Julian Cain scam.

Code:

https://explorer.vchain.info/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM
      http://veltor.org:8080/address/VmZkC4LN8ko59PeCVyxBNHGkmBaVmkwfgM

I have no idea what you are talking about, but the explanation for the same address is simple. Somebody used the same private key on both chains. Since the prefix, hashing and address format is the same for Veltor and Vcash, an identical key obviously leads to an identical address.

thanks for the fast and only reasonable response.. he obviously misunderstood my "address collision" post on vcash slack (https://i.imgur.com/ag3KQ0L.png) and began to spread his truth

I don’t get what this drama is all about.
Everything has been explained.

Anyone in doubt at this stage should obviously not commit to the project until the new codebase is released.

J.V.

Topic: VLT | Veltor | Donar Network | Minimalism. - page 27. (Read 141346 times)