Topic: VOD must be removed from DT list. - page 2. (Read 1950 times)

If it's not obvious, I'm clearly ignoring past actions, in the spirit of burying the hatchet. I don't feel I was extorted for removing my neutral feedback, as OG removed his negative feedback without expecting anything in return or communicating this to me. I was not obliged to remove my feedback, it was a choice, hence big difference, lack of extortion, bigger man theory.

What matters to me more is how others act in the present, not mistakes they might of made in the past that have since been rectified. Similar to me distrusting you from trust list Day 1 for doxxing OG, sometimes it's better to forgive and move on. This is probably where we differ in opinions more than anything.

Well, he was also the "bigger man" who called you a liar and left you negative trust first.  He uses negative trust as extortion, which you paid.  :/


Well your fight has nothing to do with me either.  Why is it in this thread? 

I think you'll find from my summary it's OG who initiated resolving the trust issue I had with him. In this scenario it's OG who was the "bigger man", not me. I just reciprocated removing my feedback, as it was the right thing to do.

I also wouldn't say I resolved all his trust issues, I still see he has negative feedback from DT (-5) as do you for that matter (-3). This also had nothing to do with me so best of luck to you both restoring your remaining trust "issues".

Looks like you resolved all of Mr OG's trust issues so easily.   Wonder if he'd stop calling me a liar and start trusting me if I stop investigating him.

But, almost fifty pages of a liar calling me a liar - I look pretty good now. 

To clear the air here publicly, a short timeline. This isn't intended to dig up the past, but instead about burying the hatchet.

• OG removed his negative feedback against me (as well as my mobile account), for unknown reasons. Thanks though, it's very respectable of you.
• I removed my neutral (but critical) feedback to OG "Gave retaliatory negative feedback...", because it was no longer accurate or relevant.
• I removed OG from my distrust list, as I only distrusted him because of his retaliatory feedback left against me, to be fair and rational.
• I PM'd Vod to inform him that his counter to OG was no longer accurate or relevant, which he then deleted.
• Vod removed me from his distrust list to his trust list, for reasons unknown, but without asking for reciprocation.
• I subsequently removed him from my distrust list, since his dubious counter feedback was removed, which had become my reason for distrusting him.
• This currently puts me at DT2 Strength 0, but otherwise from all "eligible" DT1 trust-distrust, I'm still at -1 - so don't panic.

TL:DR: I no longer distrust Vod & OG and all related feedback (+/-/n) has been removed from all parties.


Resolved, case closed.

Not surprising you’d lie about this, but in the event your memory is failing you let me make it clear that you did leave me negative trust for posting publicly available information without having had any interaction with me whatsoever. You now stating incorrect information regarding your prior actions doesn’t exactly make me regret not trusting you.

Not true, I left neutral feedback, never negative. Not much else to say on this, apart from making the same mistakes as Lauda and mosprognoz isn't a smart move imo.


You're probably right.


Also not true, no point arguing with opinions and conspiracy theories from 2017, instead look at the cryptographic facts from 2019: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/feedback-5164879


Stop shilling shitcoins dude, you'll get tagged for that shit!

DeepOnion was one of the biggest so called "airdrop" scam crypto project of all time. And dragonvslinux was one of the most active supporters of mentioned scam.

Ref 1 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/warning-deeponion-is-a-scam-proof-inside-2057229

Ref 2 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20624946

If you understand anything in crypto you will understand that it was a huge scam masked under so called "airdrop" with massive amount of shills that were posting countless spam daily on the topic. It is the largest topic in our forum history.

That project had a massive amount of shills https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19967474
Topicstarter of deeponion thread crypto-rainbow and here is his trust list https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=321080 (Check untrusted positive feedbacks.) After that, to clear his name he opened another thread saying that his previous account was hacked. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/onion-privacy-coin-with-real-use-cases-deeponion-222-released-2683530 Some of DT members followed him and gave him a neg on his new profile, but unfortunately they were removed from DT and the scammer get rid from red feedbacks. Here is his new profile and check who posted a positive feedback https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1038794 

Your parents should have taught you better.  Sometimes, for no reason at all, people will trust you - and there's not much you can do about it.  :/

Your trust rating reference doesn't point to proof that dragonvslinux is high-risk to trade with. But at least you're admitting that it is indeed a retaliatory rating. Such thin skin much DT1.

I am open to revising my decision if I could be shown some actual evidence of dragons scamming anyone..
DeepOnion actually sounds attractive as an anonymity project and it looks like the devs never scammed by dumping whatever premine stake supposedly happened or whatever..
And.. I don’t trust Lauda and mosprognos judgment whatsoever..
Soooo...

Dragons is much better than your average shitposter and I don’t think we should be running users like him off the forum lightly..

That's not true at all.  You inserted yourself in a conversation and left me a negative trust rating for posting publicly available information regarding this forum's trust network.  Obviously that was unwarranted.  I then took a look at who this idiot is that left me negative trust for posting public forum information and saw you were a scammer.  I don't think this is opinion.  After reviewing all the links it seemed like a clear cut case of you ripping off a project and pushing the scam to enrich yourself.  I do wonder why the usual scam busters (outside of Lauda) decided to ignore your scam, but won't go as far as to say those supporting you benefitted financially from the money you stole.  Personally, I'd rather not have dialogue with scammers, and I don't know why you keep mentioning me, as I don't give a fuck about you or your scam.  I left the rating you deserve and I'm done with it.  No need for you to continue following me around trying to make me seem like the bad guy when it's clear to anyone with an IQ over 60 (sorry suchmoon) that Vod is a liar, supported by childish power hungry fools, who think this is an opportunity to try and take down an honorable member to elevate themselves.  Absolutely pathetic that this is what the community has turned into.  I liked it much better when people supported those who were successful and were happy for them.  Too bad that went to shit in 2013 when every asshat in the world decided they were going to become rich by stealing Bitcoin from users of this site instead of innovating and growing Bitcoin use cases.  Some of them failing so badly they had to resort to registering new alts to try and be respected, and are jealous of accounts like mine that are old and in amazing standing.  Now besides the scammers like dragonvslinux you have morons like Vod who went broke while everyone else got rich, angerly trying to gain power of the trust system to lash out at those who were successful in the most bullish asset run of our lifetime.  All one can do is continue to state the truth and watch who supports the liars and who cares about Bitcoin.

Only just noticed this thread referencing me. Thanks for the PM to let me know! [/sarcasm]

Pharmacist is correct, Vod chose to counter negative trust from OgNasty, not similar (ex-DT) negative trust from Lauda or mosprognoz. This was obvious to me at the time, as it should have been to anyone else with half a brain. Whether the negative trust from Og was legitimate or not becomes irrelevant as to Vod's choice of countering someone's opinion instead an opinion. Vod previously had me included in his trust list, but that's a whole "different" story, obviously nothing to do with feedback I left Og 

suchmmon is also right, my negative feedback is merely from criticizing Og. I'm not surprised to see I'm not the only one either. What's new.
+1 to the OP for recognizing things. Still don't trust either of these two fools. eddie13 correctly countered this shit recently, I wouldn't worry about it anymore  

Vod: Incase it wasn't obvious, you can remove your positive feedback you left me, it's not doing either of us any favors and it never was
Not going to reply to the remainder of this thread, it's just more og-vod trash talk.

Nothing new indeed.  I only know of suchmoon as a troll who aligns herself with fraudsters obsessed with their ratings on this forum.  They attack anyone who doesn't look the other way at their dishonest manipulation of the system and irrational judging of those who don't fall in line with their nefarious scheme.  Even in the face of facts, like showing the unsolicited PM Vod sent me regarding his involvement with pedophilia, they still say I'm lying.  Nasty Derangement Syndrome, it's apparently a real thing here that sufferers like Vod, suchmoon, ibminer, TMAN, & owlcatz should probably look into getting help for.

how often do you tell the truth? the answer is never
because you are same idiot as Vod and your other fucking pets

and now you and your fucking pets ( bastards) atacking OG
nothing new

Lying about the PM. LOL. Reading is hard.

Have some mercy on Og, he can't really explain why he was lying about that PM above so he made up a mountain of bullshit to hide it.

suchmoon was helping with BPIP for quite some time before ownership changed.. and the ownership change was triggered by a loss of server drives & data, not a hack.

Just more false narratives used to perpetrate the lies and mudslinging Og continually puts out these days.

Indeed.  Over the years watching who she defends, it is clear she's trash.  It was funny watching Vod's site get hacked and then instead of helping him restore it, she decided to take it over from him.    He's dumb enough to think she's his friend as she now plans to expose him to massive amounts of liability for the chance at making pennies in profits with their new venture.  I wonder who is going to end up taking the fall when that goes bad?

and it says the liar of the whole forum
it is logical that the liar supports the liar

soochckamoon you lie from childhood ? or....?