Pages:
Author

Topic: Vod trolling me with red tag! - page 3. (Read 1187 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
June 13, 2018, 08:34:54 PM
#29
I'm sure that everybody could see this.

You keep repeating this yet ironically enough when EVERYONE responds and tells you they do not see this, you simply ignore them and continue to repeat your nonsense...

You're a persistent little troll, I do have to give you that!
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 13, 2018, 07:30:37 PM
#28
Or like, to keep the trust system somewhat decentralized?

Favoritism=centralized trust system.

And how does actmyname fit into this? I'm not aware of another similar case.

Favoritism=centralized trust system.

And why is this? One does not have to trade to disagree with a trust rating.

Favoritism=centralized trust system.

There's no requirement to have the same beliefs as everyone else

Same end result: favoritism=centralized trust system.


Furthermore, I would like to point to the fact that Vod is trying to blackmail Anduck and myself with his red tags, first he said to Anduck that one of them has to remove the tag in order to come to an agreement for removing both of their tags=personal use of default trust system, Vod is blackmailing Anduck just to get his own red tag removed. then Vod tags me 2 days after I tagged him, this is clear evidence of retaliatory feedback, I'm sure that everybody could see this.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
June 13, 2018, 06:14:25 PM
#27
theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time

Or like, to keep the trust system somewhat decentralized?

if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.

And how does actmyname fit into this? I'm not aware of another similar case.

Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce  a previously  left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback

And why is this? One does not have to trade to disagree with a trust rating.

also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.

So because an individual believes that someone has made poor judgement for a single rating, that someone should be seen as untrustworthy? There's no requirement to have the same beliefs as everyone else (again, better decentralization).
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 13, 2018, 05:11:03 PM
#26
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.

Why is it wrong? From theymos himself (who you believed should have 100% control the trust network):

It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)

Well my don DarkStar_, theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time, but if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.

Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce  a previously  left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback and also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
June 13, 2018, 05:00:41 PM
#25
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.

Why is it wrong? From theymos himself (who you believed should have 100% control the trust network):

It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
June 13, 2018, 04:50:34 PM
#24
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
I have already put down my thoughts about your idea of this "abuse".

1) You do not know if I have had any past dealings with Anduck
2) Past dealings with Anduck don't actually matter when concerning feedback
3) Countering the feedback still leaves the negative there.
You have already said that both Vod and my feedbacks toward Anduck were cases of abusing the trust system. I don't understand why you wouldn't want someone to counter an abusive negative trust, though.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 13, 2018, 04:21:05 PM
#23
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.

"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"

"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."

"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."

Let's start with those.

Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback?


I would change my negative trust on matlboroza because I have to admit that I was too harsh on him, yes I am willing to change my tag on him to neutral just in case if he ever reset his password, we could have a reference as to when he has changed his email address. regarding Vod's feedback:

I am willing to give him a chance if I see that he is willing to admit that tagging actmyname with some green was a misuse of the trust this community has given him. I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.

I am constantly changing my methods and I am trying to improve myself based on the reactions from the community members. some DT members are not like that unfortunately, they would tag somebody and would leave them for dead.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
June 13, 2018, 03:40:00 PM
#22
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.

"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"

"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."

"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."

Let's start with those.

Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback?
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 13, 2018, 03:25:48 PM
#21
Blah blah blah

I'm not a DT member, my feedback is untrusted and you could read the references yourself.
About 90 day tag, if those people stay after getting tagged, maybe we should give them another chance, 90 days is enough time to test them, don't you think?
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
June 13, 2018, 03:02:52 PM
#20
Let's not also forget his utterly nonsense negative trusts that claim changing an email address is somehow 100% proof that the account has either been sold or hacked.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
June 13, 2018, 02:57:44 PM
#19
whom I tag is none of Vod's business

Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.

Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not. DT members are not going to remove their false negative feedback. that's all I want, I want them to forgive people, I want them to remove their false tags on me and on anybody else.

"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"

"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."

"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."

Let's start with those.

You also have a shitload of spammy negatives like "90 day tag" and "see ref" without any explanation.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 13, 2018, 02:52:33 PM
#18
whom I tag is none of Vod's business

Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.

Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not. DT members are not going to remove their false negative feedback. that's all I want, I want them to forgive people, I want them to remove their false tags on me and on anybody else.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
June 13, 2018, 06:52:57 AM
#17
what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.

What I do and whom I tag is none of your business, yet you harass me here and try to bully me and retaliate against my tag on you.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
June 12, 2018, 11:57:46 PM
#16
whom I tag is none of Vod's business

Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 12, 2018, 05:53:17 PM
#15
Vod is not fit to be on DT he is consistently abusing other people with his red tags. in this case Vod is trying to moderate the trust system directly. I'm a non-DT member, what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
June 11, 2018, 04:51:08 PM
#14
So Vod tell us the truth, are you an account/trust farmer? you seem to be out of garbage posters band, are you earning money by some other means? like leaving positive trust for accounts and then selling them for money?

I only operate this one account, other than the automated bot for BPIP.

You keep reaching, bozo.
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
June 11, 2018, 04:40:02 PM
#13


The fact that you want to tag every user that changes their email address means you are the idiot.

Enough said.


copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 11, 2018, 04:33:27 PM
#12
why don't you just leave the forum?

Because I believe in Bitcoin. therefore I wont leave simply because a bunch of people have lost their ways.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
June 11, 2018, 04:22:46 PM
#11
why don't you just leave the forum?
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
June 11, 2018, 04:12:22 PM
#10
bozo.

Don't call me by your name.
Anybody who reads the reference would realize who you really are. an account farmer and trust farmer. you have so many positive feedback with no reference for people and I am sure if we dig a little deeper we'll find that most of them have changed email/password somewhere in time.

So Vod tell us the truth, are you an account/trust farmer? you seem to be out of garbage posters band, are you earning money by some other means? like leaving positive trust for accounts and then selling them for money?

Because it seems that everybody is here to earn money, I'm too here to earn money but that's not the primary goal for me here.
Pages:
Jump to: