theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time
Or like, to keep the trust system somewhat decentralized?
if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.
And how does actmyname fit into this? I'm not aware of another similar case.
Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce a previously left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback
And why is this? One does not have to trade to disagree with a trust rating.
also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.
So because an individual believes that someone has made poor judgement for a single rating, that someone should be seen as untrustworthy? There's no requirement to have the same beliefs as everyone else (again, better decentralization).
