Pages:
Author

Topic: Vote For FindCoin's Distribution (Read 3911 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 04, 2015, 04:00:50 AM
#67
i think the vote should just end. its pretty clear what is going to happen
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
January 03, 2015, 12:24:27 PM
#66
I vote other...

Don't burn them, just send them to me!!!

FVc5DbV9MBUJQqMCgxLZVrJ9S3jdx3u1nC

LOL  Wink
uki
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
January 03, 2015, 11:45:32 AM
#65
burn them will be fair if i didnt know that all thjose chaters already have his coins, so burn is fair but what about all of them who already cheat it?

Im not sure but maybe there is a better solution about it, maybe something like distribute the rest of coins between all of those wallets who didnt cheat, i mean before you guys discover all those fake wallets vps.
How would you like to discover someone using VPS/VPN? If that was so easy to do, I believe we would already have a valid solution in place.

By looking up the AS name of the wallet or attacker's botnet requesting IP
Code:
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 8.8.8.8
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
15169   | 8.8.8.8          | GOOGLE - Google Inc.,US
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 176.32.98.166
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
16509   | 176.32.98.166    | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc.,US
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 72.52.9.107
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
32787   | 72.52.9.107      | PROLEXIC-TECHNOLOGIES-DDOS-MITIGATION-NETWORK - Prolexic Technologies, Inc.,US
Then decide if you should credit the requesting IP by cross matching the AS name against a list of residential ISP AS names or have a list of black listed AS names for which you will deny coins.
good, but then you could reject payments to users who are on AS that you consider blacklisted or that are in the non-residential list, although they may be perfectly valid (first case quite unlikely, but second?). Would that improve our notion of fairness? Don't know, just asking the question.
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
January 03, 2015, 11:20:29 AM
#64
If burn I lost my coins collected? It´s so many hours with an open wallet spending light.
no. burn refers to the coins yet not distributed. Guys/Gals, please read things before posting. It is all written here at the top of the page.

Thanks. I read it but it is not enough clear for me.

My vote is burn.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 11:17:21 AM
#63
burn them will be fair if i didnt know that all thjose chaters already have his coins, so burn is fair but what about all of them who already cheat it?

Im not sure but maybe there is a better solution about it, maybe something like distribute the rest of coins between all of those wallets who didnt cheat, i mean before you guys discover all those fake wallets vps.
How would you like to discover someone using VPS/VPN? If that was so easy to do, I believe we would already have a valid solution in place.

By looking up the AS name of the wallet or attacker's botnet requesting IP
Code:
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 8.8.8.8
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
15169   | 8.8.8.8          | GOOGLE - Google Inc.,US
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 176.32.98.166
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
16509   | 176.32.98.166    | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc.,US
[root@jesus bitnodes]#  whois -h whois.cymru.com 72.52.9.107
[Querying whois.cymru.com]
[whois.cymru.com]
AS      | IP               | AS Name
32787   | 72.52.9.107      | PROLEXIC-TECHNOLOGIES-DDOS-MITIGATION-NETWORK - Prolexic Technologies, Inc.,US
Then decide if you should credit the requesting IP by cross matching the AS name against a list of residential ISP AS names or have a list of black listed AS names for which you will deny coins.
uki
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
January 03, 2015, 10:44:19 AM
#62
burn them will be fair if i didnt know that all thjose chaters already have his coins, so burn is fair but what about all of them who already cheat it?

Im not sure but maybe there is a better solution about it, maybe something like distribute the rest of coins between all of those wallets who didnt cheat, i mean before you guys discover all those fake wallets vps.
How would you like to discover someone using VPS/VPN? If that was so easy to do, I believe we would already have a valid solution in place.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 10:22:44 AM
#61
also lets make a richlist and observe the issue. then burn coins. exchange can wait for now
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
January 03, 2015, 10:15:40 AM
#60
burn them will be fair if i didnt know that all thjose chaters already have his coins, so burn is fair but what about all of them who already cheat it?

Im not sure but maybe there is a better solution about it, maybe something like distribute the rest of coins between all of those wallets who didnt cheat, i mean before you guys discover all those fake wallets vps.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 09:59:04 AM
#59
burn
uki
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
January 03, 2015, 09:46:13 AM
#58
If burn I lost my coins collected? It´s so many hours with an open wallet spending light.
no. burn refers to the coins yet not distributed. Guys/Gals, please read things before posting. It is all written here at the top of the page.
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
January 03, 2015, 09:20:15 AM
#57
If burn I lost my coins collected? It´s so many hours with an open wallet spending light.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 08:37:29 AM
#56
Not knowing too much about this coin, I voted to burn 'em.  Some in the thread suggest this coins distribution was gamed, so not sure how that will factor into it.  Best of luck.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
January 03, 2015, 08:31:38 AM
#55
tba no real options, cheaters killed the coin, sorry for the work the dev team put in. however who'd invest in a coin that cheaters gamed the distribution  Angry

full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
You are what you eat. PIZZA!
January 03, 2015, 06:53:56 AM
#54
VPS is unfair? LOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL? I know there are a lot of fucking jealous guys here. You devs are stupid and narrow mind.

I have said it before and i will say it again, who is jealous of a few dollars VPS? I gained more coins than you clowns for 1/2 of the price anyway i am so jealous  Grin

As for the devs not bending over to help you get a couple more k Find threw the faucet, instead they continue to be Fair and let the community choose, wow they are stupid and narrow minded for this aha loser stop crying.

Your post is one of a spoilt brat and i am glad your not getting anymore Find to dump. Jealous lololol!!
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 05:23:55 AM
#53
Yeah, just burn the witch, eh funds already! Grin

this coin can go very far if we take good care of it
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 04:52:44 AM
#52
Yeah, just burn the witch, eh funds already! Grin
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
January 03, 2015, 03:52:24 AM
#51
just end it allready
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
January 02, 2015, 10:42:52 PM
#50
VPS is unfair? LOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL? I know there are a lot of fucking jealous guys here. You devs are stupid and narrow mind.

There is an option to vote for keeping the faucet on by the logic that VPS = hashrate. Does that not apply to you?
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
January 02, 2015, 09:59:51 PM
#49
VPS is unfair? LOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL? I know there are a lot of fucking jealous guys here. You devs are stupid and narrow mind.
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
You are what you eat. PIZZA!
January 02, 2015, 06:43:47 PM
#48
I vote number one burn the coins, Release source code and move on
Pages:
Jump to: