... The likeliness of both building falling in the manner that they did is slim....
Not at all. Given they were hit the same way, why would the structures not react in similar fashions?
You'd have a point if, say, one of the planes had been nearly empty of fuel and the other one nearly full. But that wasn't the case.
Two planes knocked down three buildings
The third building, which was not hit by a plane, was wtc7.
....so WHAT?
For the quote in bold.
Both building were not identical. Both planes couldnt have hit at the same angle or have the same mass. There for the reactions were more then likely to be different. I am also sure that the fuel levels were not identical either.
The main point being the structures of the buildings themselves. They were different. Again. From an engineers standpoint. It wasn't possible or likely. The materials used to build these building is also public record. So you could see tinsel strength and heat tolerance. Along with a make up o alloy or steel type used in construction.
If you look at what it would take to bring these down you would find these planes are unlikely of doing this even if they were to carry twice the amount of fuel. These types of buildings are built to withstand a lot more then you think. And there are building built way before these that have caught fire and had much higher temps and they did not fall. If you lay all the evidence out on the table and look at it all. I do not see how anyone could think that there is not something wrong with the picture. I have only mentioned a few things. There are many, many, many more.
If you want me to break everything down. I have no problem. people who question any of this I am guessing are the ones who believe everything they see on CNN.
Dump some jet fuel into a coffee can, and try to get it to ignite. If you can, it burns with a smoky, heat well under 1000 degrees F.
You need some form of air blast to make the fuel burn hot enough to do any damage. This kind of thing just doesn't happen automatically. You need to work at it.
There wasn't enough heat in the buildings to do any structural damage whatsoever.
You are correct. I do have to say that it would have burned over 1000 degrees.
Even if these buildings are totally square and have equal sides. Elevator shafts placed in identical areas on all sides of the building making every side of the towers identical. The fuel would have not been distributed evenly. One side would have received more fuel then the other. Therefor theoretically you would of had one side hotter then another and a longer burn. Which you would think would in turn make one side weaker then the other causing the building to topple. Ever play Jenga? You ever make it drop straight down? No it always fall to one side or the other. Anyone who has seen or delt with demolition would have to agree that these towers were in one way or another controlled. You may have been lucky and had one drop in a fashion that looks like it dropped straight down like a controlled demolition but the likeness of both doing so is extremely slim. With the reports of secondary explosions and what was witnessed and reported. There is no way it was not at least semi controlled.
Whats your simple explanation?
Would love to hear it. Besides box structures can fall straight down.
Some simple things to think of. Is weigh of building and design. Angle and direction the air craft entered. Was the fuel distributed evenly throughout the building. Which side gave out first? Under what conditions would a cube collapse on its self? What winds were pushing in what direction at what speed? What winds were generated inward from the burn? There are really alot of factors that would have to be considered before you can rule out the possibility of a semi or fully controlled demolition.
It would be very simple to say the planes made them fall. As that is the way it looks. But not everything always looks as it seems. People need to understand this. History should be proof of this. We may never know what brought these down. Simply because we aren't meant to. But saying it simply happened the way it did with so many holes in the story and the contradictions that were issued. Either no one knows or someone does and they aren't talking. Some people may know more then others because they were there. They seen and heard what was happening. While others sat back waiting for it to happen. Some people know more then they should. Not all things are a conspiracy theory nor a theory at all. But facts that aren't meant to be know.
We can sit and debate all day everyday. It wont mean a thing. People need to be open to the possibility that what people say is possible. But there are people who are in a position that they only want to believe what they want to believe. Are not really open to less main stream ways or thoughts. I know many who only believe what they see on the news. When what you see on the news is not always correct or the full story. There are always things that are left out. And they are left out for a reason. You can not say that the towers weren't a controlled demo or that they weren't. Or that all out air craft were on training scenarios in another area and unable to intercept. Which our USCG was flying the coast during the attack (or whatever it was) That the debris found at the pentagon was debris from the corresponding plane. and That a fiberglass nose cone was able to penetrate concrete at a depth of a cruise missile. That the planes were off course and no contact was made for several minutes before anyone thought anything of it. There is a long list of things that were off that day. Normal procedures that are put in place were not followed on a magnitude that people shrug off as a coincidence. Is this really the way our government, military, and FAA work? You know it isn't. People need to open their eyes and look around them. See what they dont usually see taking place around them. Everyone sees things they shouldn't but dont relize what they are seeing because they simply dont pay attention. Take some time every once and a while and look around where you are. Work, street, coffee shop. Pay attention to other people and there reactions. You will see things you normally wouldn't. Simply because people are so hung up on there everyday lives that they fail to see instances of things around them. You will be surprised at what you see when you pay attention to thing your normally do not. Try it sometime and you will see what I am talking about. People see what they want not what they should.
Its haunting to know what we could know if we simply payed more attention. Most do not. And the ones who do always seem to be called a strange, odd, not all there, a conspiracy theorist, or anything else people tend to want to call them. But doesnt mean anything they say isnt true. Just depends on who wants to believe them.
