Official version? The question is not whether people agree with all aspects of some "official version", but something entirely different.
It is about questioning the gigantic leap you made in your thinking between a comment by Rumsfield as to level of detail in transactions, to your presenting a theory of govenrment involvement in 911 to destroy records of 2T of transactions. That ridiculous leap is the issue here. That dog don't hunt.
And yes, accounting down to the transaction level is a product of very cheap computer memory.
Your colloquialisms sure are slicker than snot on a doorknob! Concluding that when 2.3 trillion dollars goes unaccounted for, that some or most of it may have been stolen is not a giant leap in logic, in fact when money goes missing that is usually the first thing people look at. Clearly there were many reasons for the 9/11 attacks, but pointing out one of the potential motives does not mean that was the only reason why it was perpetrated. Your failure in logic is your own inability to critically examine the inconsistencies of the 9/11 commission report because you are too busy "debunking".
It's not even "debunking."
I'm just trying to indicate that 8 annual entire budgets for the entire Defense department was not and is not "missing." Keep in mind in this discussion that these budgets (which I doubt you have ever actually looked at, but please do) have black budgets right there laid out that way. They don't have to tell you what they spent that money on, but you do get an idea of the size of those sub budgets.
You can't develop a conspiracy theory on it being an inside job by first, "making up" the word "missing" and then mis interpreting that word to allow for massive thievery that required a coverup. That's ridiculous. Look at the actual budgets and the actual things Rumsfield said and what he meant and you'll see.
So you have not "pointed out one of the potential motives." Go ahead, point out some others that do make sense - be my guest.
That's the point.
The only ridiculous is spendulus
you still believe what the government shows you. so be it, hope that makes you sleep better
but am not swallowing that, and so is now most people of the world and all the families of people who perished in the 9/11... maybe they are wrong too. and the countless architect who proved that the free fall cannot happen because of jet fuel which has already burned out in the first 20-30 minutes of the crash, maybe they are wrong too, and rumsfeld saying a day before 9/11 that the pentagon cannot track 3.2 Trillion $. well maybe he was wrong too at that time. or he was drunk. then the countless other witnesses might be wrong too. and the person who "received" the passports of the hijackers from a man who ran right after giving him the passport, well maybe he was dreaming or he set up a lie. secret of the usa in wtc7 came to ash in a free fall from supposed heat from another building 1 football pitch away, well people who believe it was demolition, they might be wrong too. everybody is wrong except the people who governs usa and the specific companies directly involved with the president of that time, well they are right..
am i not right spendulus?
No, you have a rambling line of nonsense. I've explained rumsfield. You were wrong about steel, wrong about aluminum, wrong about light pieces of paper and plastic fluttering around, You were wrong about many other things.
Many of these things are based on chemistry and physics, so there isn't any "arguing" about them.
Basically you just need a warm comforting blanket inside which no Muslims do bad things, so you'd prefer a conspiracy where The Great Satan (USA) Did 911.
Oh, wait a minute. There's that darn ISIS. I guess there are some really evil people in the Muslim community.
here is the thing, I am not making the claims. i have taken word to word quotes and videos from architect and construction and demolition companies.. various.
but your argument is based on your beliefs and on the government reports..
also, i never said all muslims are good. there are extremist like in every community as well as atheism. i never denied it.
as for alquaida, the CIA and some fbi whistleblowers have already confirmed, as well as former people in the defence ministry have confirmed the alquaida was a joint operation of the USA to infiltration. and for the ISIS the USa government already denied that they are related to the muslim community.
in fact they are just nutheads in politics. there is a political war everytime and what the USA show the world and what really is the truth is 2 different things. Jon Stewart already provided some reports on that as well as independent talk shows within the USA. if you need some proofs i will be glad to provide more videos. but will you even watch one? you havent watched any of what i provided. fear of popping your bubble? you seem to be the one who just need a warm comforting blanket inside which only Muslims do bad things and are responsible for every act of terrorism.
terrorism/ terror as a word itself does not apply to muslims,
terrorism
ˈtɛrərɪzəm/Submit
noun
the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims
it never said religious aims right?
well here is what you would do, pick a few words or 1-2 line from what i replied and continue with your hate speech against muslims.. its not the first thread you are doing it, it certainly wont be the last one.. but what you are doing is, instead of trying to bring all people together, people like you are creating even more distance amongst each other of every religions
