When I used to play poker, I often saw similar withdrawal conditions there, only there it was necessary to double your deposit at account on the service. That is, if you have entered $ 1,000, and you want to withdraw them, then you should earn another $ 1,000. Even then, this demand seemed unfair, because it seems to force you to play, play and play.
Are you aware that most of the casino nowadays especially those who have a Curacao license requires x1 wagering on the deposit amount counter the use of the casino on mixing purposes. That x1 wagering doesn’t mean you need to earn x1 of your deposit but only a wager so it’s good if you just break even in the end. I doubt there’s a casino that requires user to earn a certain profit before they can withdraw, probably you overlook the wagering requirements details on the poker site that you play.
Wagering requirements on deposit is not unfair as long as it’s already there before you made deposit. It’s player responsibility to check all the casino standards before we deposit. The only time this requirements become unfair is when you deposit and the casino changed the rules afterwards to trap your deposit.
The author of the topic above wrote that the deposit should be increased five times.
This is an incredibly unfair demand!
The owners of the casino expect that this money will be lost on their site.
Regardless of this wagering requirements. Casino really expects that players will loss part of their money due to the house edge. But in regards with this specific casino. It offers a bonus without a wagering requirements which means they are using the deposit wagering requirements as back up safety measure to prevent cheater abusing their no wager requirements bonus. The problem on this kind of bonus structure was players often don’t read the ToS due to the excitement on claiming the bonus.
Who doesn’t love no wagering requirements bonus?