Topic: Wall Observer BCH/USD - Bcash price movement tracking & discussion - page 2. (Read 2082 times)

All I know is that it's been a long time since bcash has been pumped and I'm hoping to get more free money damnit.

Come on bcashers. Pump that shit.

I believe that my frustration is that Heuristic is not really talking about bcash, but instead he is misdescribing what bitcoin is, and also saying what he wished bitcoin would be, which is something that bcash already attempts to differentiate itself by.

In other words, Heuristic does not seem to be suggesting to come over to bcash because bcash has the preferred BIG blocker features (from his point of view), but instead he is whining that 1) bitcoin is supposedly broken for the false reasons that he asserted without even really talking about how bcash has the features and 2) that bitcoin needs to be fixed because it is lacking those features (which is not really even on the bcash topic because he does not make such a connection in his post).

No, this is definitely the place for the bitcoin vs bcash debate. The moderator for this thread openly supports such discussion here. If it were to infiltrate the bitcoin part of bitcointalk it would just become annoying as hell. In the altcoin section it makes sense.

That's bullshit.  N0 one was promised Segwit2x.  There was a backdoor agreement, aka NY agreement that some insiders attempted to play off as a possible path towards segwit2x, and it was a kind of hostage play that did not work out and kind of exploded when both the useractivated softfork and the BIP91 proposal allowed for a path of achieving consensus on segwit, prior to 2x.  2x was not test, and more importantly it was not as accepted by the bitcoin community as it was propagandized as being.... So, yeah, segwit2x was an attempted trick that backfired, rather than a "promise," as you assert.

  Sure some people got played, but that playing of people probably came more from the misleading aspects of the ny agreement, and folks within that agreement attempting to suggest more to come out of that (including the 2x aspect) than they were capable of delivering because for the most part, the bitcoin community did not want that 2x crap in part because 1) it had not been shown to be necessary, 2) had been tested and 3) was not even close to likely to receive consensus without at least establishing 1 & 2, first.


If bitcoin were to need a dynamic block size, then it seems that something like that would be implemented into it and achieved.  Seem that currently, things are going pretty fucking well for bitcoin, in terms of the greater use of segwit, decent transaction times, relatively low fees, fending off and disincentivising spam attacks, progression of second layer solutions, such as lightning network, and actual real world evidence from the bcash shill nutjobs that BIG blocks are really stupid, unjustified and counter-productive, so those old talking points about the supposed emergency to "so something" with bitcoin, "anything", including "increasing the blocksize" are not convincing, and even some of the newbies are recognizing the value of bitcoin and the vacuousness of various "bitcoin is broken" talking points.


Funny that you are making your "bitcoin is broken" arguments in the bcash WO thread... Why not just join the Bcashers and build upon that BIG blocker confirmed platform?  Anyhow, your facts about the "need" for a bitcoin dynamic block size seems to be weak at best, yet I still don't really understand why you complain about bitcoin when you gots ur selfie some bcash to work with that solves and focuses on that particular BIG blocker solution... What it wrong with that?  Be gone to bcash, right?

Oh heck yes! Somebody who finally gets it!

There is alot of truth mixed in there, people did not support Segwit because we were promised Seg2X. There was a big setup there and people got played. Bitcoin needs a dynamic block size but Asics can't handle it so basically it's being torn apart by greed. Bip 141.142 IIRc. Shit I can't remeber 6 months ago.

Either way everyone except the moneymen got played and BTC doesn't have a dynamic blocksize, thats pretty much the facts in my mind.

If you say you are selling Bitcoin but indeed you are selling some worthless fork you are a thief. There's nothing "free" in supporting the scammers.

On a crypto market green day we can all go to the regular wall observer to feel good. On a red day we can come here to feel good. A thread for every market condition!

The levels of how low Ver and his shills can go got to rock bottom:

https://blog.bitcoin.com/the-story-of-how-bitcoin-was-compromised/

They will rather see the whole concurrency idea damaged then to admit they blew it with their altcoin. They are not even hiding it any more, this is Bitcoin.com site, which many people can wrongly believe represents Bitcoin.

  -9% today . another day another fork another drop

Hey gang, I just saw that BitPay is shilling for bcash!

When you go to pay with bitcoin they show you two options, bitcoin or bcash. Then they set a minimum network fee for bitcoin and show you the network fee for both. The last time I went to pay for something it showed bitcoin network fee cost of 13 cents and 0 cents for bcash (even though the mempool was empty).

Add to that, Coinbase is dropping its payment services.

So pretty soon, any merchant accepting bitcoin in the US will be actively encouraging people to use bcash!

Bcash to the moon!

Thank you BitPay!

CONFIRMED

That guy is walking talking cancer. Why cant he just find a hole somewhere, crawl inside it and spare the rest of humanity.

I wish it were. Roger Ver bought @Bitcoin on Twitter.

wtf is this shit??

some kinda joke??

So the "real" Bitcoin is a trusted centralized setup now?

You just can't make this shit up.