Despite your protestations, you have utterly failed -- in any manner whatsoever -- to describe any core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks.
You are not the boss of me.
True. You're gonna do what you're gonna do. And you're not gonna do what you're not gonna do.
That b call Koreck.
One of those items on the latter list
There is no list, except you created your own list (aka demand)
would appear to be to provide a description of the core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks. For you have yet to do so, despite your repeated false statements that you already have.
I described the BTC plan sufficiently for my own liking, and I am investing in bitcoin, in spite of peeps like you concluding that the BTC plan is not specific or clear or elaborate or "future proof" enough.
I am not investing into bcash variants, even though peeps like you believe that bcash variants have superior plans than BTC and are already ready to scale the fuck out of things with their 45 lane roads and much less than 1 lane of traffic....
In other words, a supposed plan that meets your 45 plus lanes specifications, does not cause a lot of folks to conclude that BTC is inferior to bcash variants, in spite of those bcash variants having supposed superior, specific, more clear & elaborate and "future proof"plans, as compared with BTC.
In other words, whatever BTC plan is there and whether I am able or know exactly what it is or explain it to your satisfaction remains good enough for me (and presumably a whole lot of others), so I am sticking with the babe that brought me to this dance... because she seems better than those other slimy sluts (aka bcash variants).
Sounds good?
