Weekly Cloud overview. #dyor
#stronghands
#stronghands
This chart would suggest price is likely to stay around $4k (=/- 1k) until June 2020.
I would guess that is not a popular view. Most posters would refuse to believe it.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11119. (Read 26729263 times)
April 04, 2019, 04:35:04 AM
This chart would suggest price is likely to stay around $4k (=/- 1k) until June 2020.
I would guess that is not a popular view. Most posters would refuse to believe it.
April 04, 2019, 04:34:42 AM
No one can find Satoshi anymore, there is no profit by all these plays, It Is only Drama 
April 04, 2019, 04:28:49 AM
Just when you thought he couldn't get any douchier, CSW is now suing people who say he's not Satoshi:
https://cryptoslate.com/craig-wright-filing-lawsuits-against-people-denying-he-is-satoshi-nakamoto/
https://cryptoslate.com/craig-wright-filing-lawsuits-against-people-denying-he-is-satoshi-nakamoto/
April 04, 2019, 04:06:45 AM
https://micky.com.au/porn-star-reveals-why-cam-girls-love-crypto/
She licks her armpit for Bitcoin. Bullish.
She licks her armpit for Bitcoin. Bullish.
April 04, 2019, 03:59:48 AM
This is the kind of Ayahuasca/DMT Hopium smoked by Shamans in the Amazon and I full support having the 100k party in the Amazon if we make it there this year.
No wonder this beer is so good!
Ill take a keg of that please sir!
April 04, 2019, 03:58:47 AM
I missed this earlier this year, but it appears our Russian Economist claiming Russian oligarchs and companies bought 1.8 million BTC this year to avoid sanctions now and down the road, might be the real thing. I notice one rebuttal in the Bitcoinist.com to this guys claim was a quote from a Russian source saying the gov never bought the coins, but as far as I see the economist said it wasnt the Russian gov who bought the coins but oligarchs and corporations.
https://micky.com.au/video-proves-identity-of-russias-mysterious-bitcoin-bull/
https://micky.com.au/video-proves-identity-of-russias-mysterious-bitcoin-bull/
April 04, 2019, 03:56:38 AM
Drink beer and feeling good mood relax in the bed looking wall and see BTC Dump/bump 
April 04, 2019, 03:52:31 AM
This is the kind of Ayahuasca/DMT Hopium smoked by Shamans in the Amazon and I full support having the 100k party in the Amazon if we make it there this year.
No wonder this beer is so good!
April 04, 2019, 03:49:03 AM
Just for knowing BoB all must be gay-friendly for me or its an absolute NO GO!!!!
Just a "friendly reminder, you don't really "know" bob, just like with any of us.
You have "met" "his" online persona.
Yeah, but like his online being as many in here, but don’t need to point that @me my Real life is under perfect controll with many real life peeps.....
But one can like Some online talkers or not
And i like a few very much ‘they know for sure’
Is so much lovey dovey healthy? I wonder.
you love your keyboard
Have you even heard about "non-sequitur"?
your just a strange bird, so one has to do strange to be sense-full to you
Huh?
I am normal. I just post here from time to time.
Again.. someone seems to be mixing up online persona with real peeps.
Snap out of it. Get a grip, mic.
From "time to time"
Its Thursday, so Ill think Ill drop some truth on you old friend
You really wonder if Mic being so friendly to others on this forum is healthy? Of course it is. Being consistently cranky, salty, confrontational, toxic etc in your every day life to everyone around you is extremely unhealthy and wreaks havoc on your physical and mental health. Study after study has demonstrated the negative health consequences of living life as an obstinate prick. It shortens your lifespan and decreases your health and quality of life(Thursdays for instance) for the duration of your shorter life.
Instead of jealously criticizing Mr. Goose for being friendly and well liked here, you should emulate some of his character traits and you will stay alive to hodl longer and maybe bag on JJG thursdays will be called off even.
April 04, 2019, 03:22:13 AM
Weekly Cloud overview. #dyor
#stronghands
#stronghands
April 04, 2019, 02:42:31 AM
April 04, 2019, 02:39:45 AM
Inspired by Kurious' recent post, I'd like to post about some related things I've been thinking about:
It seems there are two schools of thought regarding the bubble cycle we've just begun.
There's a great debate, on this exact subject, between two of the best analysts on crypto twitter here: https://twitter.com/filbfilb/status/1078316170493734918
It seems that scenario 2 is the consensus among the majority of analysts (and previously myself) - that the next bubble will gain a lower percentage than previous bubbles, and it will take longer. Something like this:
However, there are reasons to believe that may not be the case:
[/SNIP]
It seems there are two schools of thought regarding the bubble cycle we've just begun.
- That it will be the same length as every other cycle, as dictated by the halvings. Bubble top: late 2021/early 2022
- Or, that the cycles have been lengthening, and therefore our current cycle will be the longest and hit the top later than in previous cycles. Bubble top: late 2022/early 2023
There's a great debate, on this exact subject, between two of the best analysts on crypto twitter here: https://twitter.com/filbfilb/status/1078316170493734918
It seems that scenario 2 is the consensus among the majority of analysts (and previously myself) - that the next bubble will gain a lower percentage than previous bubbles, and it will take longer. Something like this:
However, there are reasons to believe that may not be the case:
[/SNIP]
Whoa. You have to be luck to intercept deep thought posts in WO, where it get quickly devoured in memes and one liners. I’m going to cross reference it in my monthly post to scan for good analysis..
April 04, 2019, 02:34:10 AM
bitcoin will fall under 3000 soon
never trust this fake pump
never trust this fake pump
These trolls make it so easy to ignore.
That's alright, we need people like them to make this market more entertaining.
They are also needed in order to keep BTC's price down, because if everyone was smart like us BTC HODLers/accumulators, we would have to pay more than $1million per coin. Thank you dumb trolls and shills.
Edit: Where's roach.. gotta thank that dumb-ass, too.
April 04, 2019, 02:17:09 AM
5-6k feels just like 500-600 from 2015-2016. And $3k probably was the $200 which isn't coming back again.
From now on, assuming it'll follow the same pattern, the price may get stuck between $4k and $6k for a year.
Too cheap to sell after seeing $20k but also at the same time, too expensive to buy after seeing sub $4k not long ago.
This, gentlemen is:
Torture.
Welcome to consolidation.
From now on, assuming it'll follow the same pattern, the price may get stuck between $4k and $6k for a year.
Too cheap to sell after seeing $20k but also at the same time, too expensive to buy after seeing sub $4k not long ago.
This, gentlemen is:
Torture.
Welcome to consolidation.
If we bounce in the between $4k and $6k price (consolidation) zone, then 6 months seems reasonable, 8 months seem like a stretch and 12 months seems like too much (in other words 12 months is unacceptable... Go back and work on a better answer, mindrust)..
... 
April 04, 2019, 01:57:19 AM
after this small correction we need a bottom post, right?
April 04, 2019, 01:56:34 AM
Ginko has done it again :
https://twitter.com/martik/status/1113037703774396416
https://bitcoinist.com/russia-bitcoin-kremlin-economist/
https://twitter.com/martik/status/1113037703774396416
https://bitcoinist.com/russia-bitcoin-kremlin-economist/
Moscow bought over 10% of all of the BTC in circulation? What clown think tank he claims to work for?
April 04, 2019, 01:51:55 AM
Still unanswered: How LN is going to help when Layer 1 is already clogged to the point of uselessness.
We will cross that bridge when we get there.
If this price pump continues, we could get there next week. Unfortunately, there is no solution on the horizon under discussion.
You are fucking ridiculous on this point, jbreher. Dumbass BIG BLOCKERS have been acting chicken little on this topic since at least late 2015, and they have been wrong, wrong wrong.. except to the extent to which they have engaged in some spam attacks to attempt to make it look like their wrong chicken little speculations were coming true.
And, get the fuck out of here with your exaggeration that there is no plan in BTC.. because with segwit and other tweaks including lightning network, batching and some other technical mumbo jumbo stuff, BTC transactions are getting processed... and fees also will adjust to help to channel and incentivize transactions too...
so fuck off in your attempting to act like there is neither progress in bitcoin or that there is some kind of supposed emergency situation in bitcoin that justifies a block increase - which is still not necessary, even though you and your dumb BIG blocker buddies keep trying to present such nonsense solutions to increase the block size limits as if they were "obvious solutions," and they are not.. they are just stupid.. and counter to any necessary solution.. you want to break bitcoin like you and your buddies broke your impotent bcash(es) variants?
You claim to be a bitcoiner, but I have to question you with your stubborn continued persistence spouting out such repetitive nonsense that has been debunked over and over and over in the past 3.5 years. There is no there there.. so focus your lil selfie.
Once the blocks are full, no additional people can open a LN channel. Nobody can close an LN channel. (Not without out-paying those txs already waiting to be built into a block).
you are speculating about something that has never happened.. Even in December 2017/January 2018 (when your bitmain buddies and Roger Ver had enough money to engage in their spam attack), transactions still went through, as long as higher fees were paid... so if the fees might go up during such clogging periods. By the way, funny how bitmain is now broke.. ver might not be doing so well.. and maybe still hoping for calvin ayere to keep haning out with you other social pariahs.
Nobody can post evidence of stolen channel funds as a result of counterparty posting an earlier channel state. Nobody can get BTC into or out of exchanges. ...
Let's see how it plays out... sounds like you are making shit up, for the moment.. so let's see if it becomes a BIGGER issue that is does not get resolved... Lots of smart people working and submitting ideas in bitcoin core, so they are likely to continue figuring out a variety of things as they already have been with the passage of time.. And maybe you should be discussing these technical matters in another thread, anyhow? you fuck with attempts at technical mumbo jumbo, here.
All y'all are hanging your hopes on a promise that has no chance to deliver its stated benefits.
You and your BIG BLOCKER nutjob buddies have already proven yourselves to be inclined towards exaggerations about supposed dire outcomes, and likely going to happen again... with exaggerated points like you are making here.
Sure, LN will have important use cases. But at the cost of crippling the base layer? Collective delusion.
Of course, LN will have important use cases.. at least you recognize that aspect.. and if you think that there some kind of crippling then get the fuck out of here. Don't use lightning then nor build upon it, and go over to your shitcoin (I mean various bcashes) projects to whine about how horrible bitcoin is, while bitcoin is going to leave those bcashes crappies in the dust in terms of innovations, development, adoption and even ongoing price performance..
April 04, 2019, 01:44:03 AM
April 04, 2019, 01:32:21 AM
I want that correction! Buy order ready at $4600:
A suggestion: Don’t use round numbers for your limit orders. Put it $20 or $30 above because if the price is going to bounce, it will bounce above $xx00. If the prices touches $xx00 then it’s going to drop below that amount. Hairy is correct, as seems to be a frequent pattern in recent times with these price and practice matters.
In sum, best practice is that you should be setting your buy orders a bit higher than the round numbers and also your sell orders a bit lower than the round numbers.
When you assert that price might possibly do x, y or z and half way eat through such round numbers blah blah blah.. you are being both intellectually lazy and likely more greedy than you need to be. The odds are against you, too, especially if you look at how the BTC price usually behaves and even if you want to attempt to rationalize away your bad practice(s), seeming laziness and lack of desire to improve your approach.
Yeah but if the wall is at 4620 you need to put your order in @4625 or something. Walls do tend to be on the round numbers but even the walls cut infront of eachother..
Look at the books to place your orders..
Even though I have a system in which I steadfastly follow what Hairy suggested, not placing either my buy orders or my sell orders at round numbers. I rarely go so far as to structure my orders around random walls on the order book.. unless I just coincidentally notice such walls and I want to get my order filled before that wall is touched upon, as you suggested eddie.
For me, I would rather just stick with my system that is based on my own attempts to keep emotions out of the matter, so I don't really care very much if the orders get filled or not.. .but like you mentioned if there is some obvious issue or even certain key resistance or support points, then I will attempt to tweak my orders around those kinds of possible sticking points.
April 04, 2019, 01:23:50 AM
Jump to: