Dirty little bug
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
Where's Last of the V8s? What have you done with him?
HI-TEC99
didn't like V8s' haiku.
Talents are wasted.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11232. (Read 26727523 times)
March 24, 2019, 04:28:22 PM
Where's Last of the V8s? What have you done with him?
HI-TEC99
didn't like V8s' haiku.
Talents are wasted.
March 24, 2019, 04:26:30 PM
Where's Last of the V8s? What have you done with him?
He's upset Basel III regulations cemented physical metals as the base of Exter's pyramid and not a word was spoken about imaginary, valueless, digital shitcoins that day.
March 24, 2019, 04:19:12 PM
Dirty little bug
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
Where's Last of the V8s? What have you done with him?
March 24, 2019, 04:07:43 PM
Dirty little bug
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
skittering along the floor.
Look up to the moon.
March 24, 2019, 03:56:58 PM
Carbon credits are an Enron scam.
March 24, 2019, 03:51:16 PM
Good evening bitcoiners, just a comment from Sweden passing by
This was written in 1989, sounds familiar? https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
This was written in 1989, sounds familiar? https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
Are you a heavy cigarette smoker Arie?
March 24, 2019, 03:41:45 PM
Jewish shitcoiner featured on Daily Stormer (any dumbass with the word "anarcho" in their description is a shitcoiner). I wonder which one of you this guy is:
https://dailystormer.name/anarcho-vegan-jew-records-video-trying-to-get-toddler-daughters-to-consent-to-sex-with-him/
https://dailystormer.name/anarcho-vegan-jew-records-video-trying-to-get-toddler-daughters-to-consent-to-sex-with-him/
March 24, 2019, 03:35:44 PM
Good evening bitcoiners, just a comment from Sweden passing by
This was written in 1989, sounds familiar? https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
This was written in 1989, sounds familiar? https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
March 24, 2019, 03:15:32 PM
Assuming it’s all completely innocent, we still end up in the same place. Bitmex does not have an acceptable level of liquidity to support market orders. Which is kinda important.
Why are you even pretending bucketshops aren't scams BY DEFINITION. "Support market orders"
It's not a fucking market. It's like a guy standing in an alleyway with 3 cups telling people to guess which one the ball is underneath. The Dow and Comex are scam bucketshops too. March 24, 2019, 03:14:04 PM
Interesting stat: Belgium has a very high divorce rate (70%).
Nothing wrong with divorce.
True, but it won't add years to your life (in most cases) and would not make you richer (on paper) as well.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Which of these phases are you up to? The marriage phase of your life, or the kids phase?
Even university doesn't teach to student how to survive in wild capitalism. They are supposed to teach us about the fake money(illusion) and fake history...
March 24, 2019, 03:13:21 PM
^
Bearmarket
Bearmarket
March 24, 2019, 03:10:23 PM
Interesting stat: Belgium has a very high divorce rate (70%).
Nothing wrong with divorce.
True, but it won't add years to your life (in most cases) and would not make you richer (on paper) as well.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Which of these life phases are you up to? The marriage phase of your life, or the having kids phase?
March 24, 2019, 03:04:08 PM
Assuming it’s all completely innocent, we still end up in the same place. Bitmex does not have an acceptable level of liquidity to support market orders. Which is kinda important.
March 24, 2019, 02:56:53 PM
Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on slippage? In what way would it screw with trading?
I would assume the implication was that: if real volume be truly that large, then slippage should be much less than that experienced.
The particular trade that I found galling had me enter a stop loss at $xx93 (which was below a major support point). The price fell through the support and the sell order executed at $xx20, which is $73 in slippage.
The most slippage I have previously experienced on breaking major support was $13 on Bitstamp at a much higher price (therefor far lower slippage in percentage terms).
This leads me to believe that either: (a) Bitmex has exceptionally poor liquidity or (b) their proprietary trading desk is front running trades or (c) they are deliberately discriminating against fish in the order book.
The net result is the same.
While there are some complexities around whether one uses the last, mark or index price as trigger, it really all comes out in the same place. None of this should be impacted by the particular rules of the instrument, and this was not a liquidation (I have never been liquidated and don’t intend to start).
I have had a number of other trades on Bitmex where my slippage has been about 10x what I would expect. Given that Bitmex supposedly has 10x the volume of Bitstamp and 10x liquidity, something is rotten in the State of Seychelles. I would go so far as to say either they are front running their own customers or their organic volume is about 1% of what they claim.
Makes sense. OR... maybe traders at Bitmex are *WAY* more prone to using leverage and stop loses which causes *HUGE* slippage due to "cascading" than Bitstamp traders. Think about it... it also makes some sense.
March 24, 2019, 02:50:45 PM
Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on slippage? In what way would it screw with trading?
I would assume the implication was that: if real volume be truly that large, then slippage should be much less than that experienced.
The particular trade that I found galling had me enter a stop loss at $xx93 (which was below a major support point). The price fell through the support and the sell order executed at $xx20, which is $73 in slippage.
The most slippage I have previously experienced on breaking major support was $13 on Bitstamp at a much higher price (therefor far lower slippage in both nominal and percentage terms).
This leads me to believe that either: (a) Bitmex has exceptionally poor liquidity or (b) their proprietary trading desk is front running trades or (c) they are deliberately discriminating against fish in the order book.
The net result is the same.
While there are some complexities around whether one uses the last, mark or index price as trigger, it really all comes out in the same place. None of this should be impacted by the particular rules of the instrument, and this was not a liquidation (I have never been liquidated and don’t intend to start).
I have had a number of other trades on Bitmex where my slippage has been about 10x what I would expect. Given that Bitmex supposedly has 10x the volume of Bitstamp and 10x liquidity, something is rotten in the Seychelles. I would go so far as to say either they are front running their own customers or their organic volume is about 1% of what they claim.
March 24, 2019, 02:34:55 PM
Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on slippage? In what way would it screw with trading?
I would assume the implication was that: if real volume be truly that large, then slippage should be much less than that experienced.
Yes. In a nutshell.
March 24, 2019, 02:31:15 PM
True, but it won't add years to your life (in most cases) and would not make you richer (on paper) as well.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Oh, sure, there's downsides as well as upsides, but I meant more in a moral sense. Being divorced doesn't make you a bad person. A country's divorce rate doesn't make the country a bad place.
Being divorced doesn't make you a bad person. It just guarantees you a place in hell.
Being divorced does only make you ONE thing i guess.... to be much more CAREFUL
March 24, 2019, 02:30:19 PM
So he claims it will be at least 6 years until we return to ATH, on no evidence whatsoever.
I read into the blog that blogger subscribes to the 'time stretch between successive peaks' theory.
I find it ignorant of the underlying economics of the issuance halvening cycle, but it seems at least more than 'no evidence whatsoever'.
That’s fine but he should present some evidence of time stretch. Otherwise it is assuming the outcome.
March 24, 2019, 02:29:22 PM
True, but it won't add years to your life (in most cases) and would not make you richer (on paper) as well.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.
Oh, sure, there's downsides as well as upsides, but I meant more in a moral sense. Being divorced doesn't make you a bad person. A country's divorce rate doesn't make the country a bad place.
Being divorced doesn't make you a bad person. It just guarantees you a place in hell.
March 24, 2019, 02:24:25 PM
Slightly different, but my Dad left a coin a year to a charity. It was pretty cunning, but is effing annoying for me, especially as he left me a lot less.
Jump to: