Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11334. (Read 26725626 times)

I would congratulate anyone leaving the Muslim faith if that’s their choice.  It is, generally speaking, highly misogynistic and incompatible with modern values.  The same could be said for Catholics, Jews and any other Abrahamic religion and probably others beside but that’s neither here nor there.

The shooter announced he was going in on 8chan.


online coin flip

Edit:  nice to see that Roach is already saying it is a false flag operation despite calling for Jewish genocide on most days. No irony there.

I guess that is why I outlined my presumptions.

I doubt that it is reasonable to presume fuck you status until you have reached it, and seems to me that anything below 200 coins has not yet achieved such status, but that does not mean that either in the near future less than 200 coins would be enough or that some individuals can be very innovative in their living within their means abilities (also possibly based on their current status), and therefore they would reach such "fuck you" status on a much lower amount than I consider to be the current minimum....

By the way, 200 coins of capital represents about $2,576 per month of passive income status, which I would consider to be a bare minimum (even though it is doable and a bit of a cramp of lifestyle, for me), but I think $3,500 would be more reasonable of a starting point, based on my already spoiled and entitled expectations.

Finally, I believe it is presumptuous to arrive at your "fuck you" status before you have actually arrived, because it is likely to lead to more stress than necessary.. unless the BTC price goes shooting up from here.. which also could happen, but I would not want to presume or make a plan before such event actually did happen.

We're dedicated to the USDT and its reliability

Seems like it's up in terms of dollars due to BTC appreciating, while being down in terms of BTC. Only took a quick glance on CMC though, so room for error here.

Could well be true. We've seen examples of this in the past.

But regardless of why he did it, he should be punished. And wasting tax money to sustain evil is against my beliefs, so execution would be my vote. I don't care how bad someone had it or what other reasons drove them into such crimes, once they choose to attack innocent people they've forfeited their human rights and should be removed from the gene pool.

Might be more based on what each individual thinks it Will reach in a foreseeable future (few years from now)

I didn’t vote yes

But it would be awesome if the answer = 1

You chase money every single day.
You stress over money all your life.
You worship money.

But you have no idea why money is valuable.

Money controls your life because you have no understanding of what it is.

Once you ask yourself “What is money?”, Bitcoin will make sense.


https://twitter.com/misir_mahmudov/status/1106283999171874820?s=21

I voted for the new poll, not the usual one.

it's cool - 

I started reading this guy's supposed "manifesto" and so far I'm leaning towards it being some type of (((govt))) false flag.  It's completely impossible for this guy to know about any of these issues he's discussing in these 80 pages WITHOUT knowing the main group responsible pushing for white genocide by being flooded with 3rd world brown zombies is the Jew.  So far he hasn't even mentioned the Jews at all and ONLY talked about Muslims.

This is the Jewish moneychanger's main goal - a divide and conquer strategy - to try and get all these disparate groups to fight one another instead of focusing their attention where it belongs on things like the Jewish media and banks instead.  If it wasn't a false flag, he probably would not have wasted his life on a useless target like a 'mosque' and went after some media, bankers, or crooked politicians instead.  

You also have to factor in it's extremely unlikely for someone to commit suicide by cop in a mass shooting against a supposed enemy while stating all these views about wanting to 'fix' society.  Anyone wanting to fix things usually wants to stick around and not volunteer for suicide attacks.

I would forfeit one of my senses. Would have to check how food tastes without smell first to decide. But with a Billion there'd be a very real chance to live to and beyond a time where new senses can be created at will. One of which would surely compensate for smell, taste, or whatever. Nobody said I can't have a sense that is virtually identical to the sense I gave up for the Billion.

Also might consider agreeing to never seeing my loved ones again. It doesn't state that I permanently won't be able to do so. Agreements can be broken, and there's no clause that states that my Billion would be taken away after the fact.

Laughter seems irrelevant too if it doesn't take away the dopamine hit along with it.

And memories can be restored, which this poll doesn't forbid in any way.

@ infofront:

Surely I like the new poll:

>>>>>>How many BTC does it take to be a fuckyoucoiner?
 1
 2-9
 10-19
 20-39
 40-69
 70-99
 100-149
 150-199
 200-499
 500-999
 1000+
<<<<<

I am presuming this to be a question based on current market conditions, and BTC expectations on such current market conditions.. so to be able to say that you are in a kind of "fuck you" status right now.. and based on minimum number of coins to perceive yourself to have sufficiently reached such "fuck you" status.

Since you may have seen some of my posts on that subject, you likely have a decent idea where I fall. Accordingly, I do believe that the ranges at the bottom are too small and the ranges at the top are too large, but I suppose we can see where the respondents fall and I suspect that the results should skew towards the top.... based on what I believe to be the presumptions of the question; however, can already see that the results seem to be more scattered so responders seem to be reaching presumptions different from my own... who would have thunk?   

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Extremes usually are the most efficient way of getting a quick overview on a topic. They're the limit cases of what's possible and make it easier to sort out what's "in between". Also partially why that technique is used so often in Math and Physics.

I would see the guy who did the shooting executed, among with other terrorists of any other creed. I would show zero lenience with people like the rapist who shared videos of his grotesque crimes on Instagram the other day either. And I think that dipshit was white if I recall correctly.

But the rest seems like an appeal to emotion. I don't see why you shouldn't be allowed to publicly worry about a set of people with an increased associated - at least perceived - risk. Instigation to crime is one thing, and should be punishable under all circumstances to the full extent of the law (which in some cases may be far too lenient). But problems have to be properly analyzed or they'll take control over humanity, as opposed to humanity solving problems.

What would you say to Muslims who have left their faith whilst criticizing it by the way?


And in general, problems tend to get worse if you instigate or if you ignore them by not talking about them. The real issue we seem to have is that one side instigates (populist parties) while the other side tries to shove the problem under the carpet (left-wing) out of fear of losing voters by discussing the unpleasant aspects of the problems and worries that some people have.

Did anyone see this part of the "shooter" manifesto?  haha:

A little thing called, "truth."  Have you heard of it?  Oh, I see from the remainder of your post, you are trying to claim a vision about "truth," yet you may either need spectacles or perhaps if you were able to remove yourself from your bias, you might be able to at least recognize that you are in the wrong thread for propagating such supposed self-described "truths"


Nah.. it is just an exaggeration to suggest both that there is a pretty small group of influencers in connection with Bcash SV, and Ayes plays a very central role with his bank account.... so who fucking cares about any remaining details that don't matter? except for BIGBLOCKER sympathizers like yourself.. who wants to purposefully come up with an excuse to pump baloney narrative of all the supposed greatness of Bcash from your point of view.. and again who cares, this is a bitcoin, not a shitcoin thread.


You are not injecting truth, you are injecting irrelevant details down the road of off-topicness.

Our various exaggerations do not need to be corrected or rerouted by supposed truth from your perspective because it is both off topic, and few people here (besides yourself) gives a ratt's ass to want to verify the extent to which you might be somewhat true in your representations of such skewed views that BIG BLOCKS are great....   so in that regard, your self-proclaimed abilities to spot truth are questionable at best, and surely also there have been plenty of times that you have presented a vast variety of spins as if they were factual truths, and they were spins  of conclusions that you would like to reach about speculative flaws that you view there to be in BTC... so get off of your petard of a high horse, dear kind sir.



No need to get sexual about this, especially when you are the one trying to inject off-topicness in the guise of purported "truth" as if it were actually relevant in these here parts.    Didn't you know that you (as the equivalent of a cat) were in bat country, here?

It has its uses and there are many stablecoins these days. Hedging between them can help you increase your profits while simultaneously keeping risk low. Whether or not people want to use it is of course up to them. I personally don't because I don't want to risk Bitcoin unexpectedly taking off regardless of technical indicators, but I would certainly have a larger stash now if I had used stablecoins.

I like how CNBC tries to spin that a 5% gain for the year on bitcoin is an awesome reward for holding a high risk "asset" that can literally go to zero at any second from a random cryptography bug or side channel, or just completely implode naturally since it's entire valuation is based on nothing but market manipulation.

Actually you might have persuaded me that 2 + 2 doesn’t necessarily equal 4.  You might have gotten me there.

I haven’t responded because I am still thinking about it.  To your point, it’s not a topic I know a lot about.

Here comes the CNBC Indicator. Short now?