^I edited my post to add more information. "Anarchists" were clearly used as useful idiots in Russia in order to destabilize the existing order and bring in Jewish communism. Libertardians will serve the exact same role as they did anywhere you go. You do not seem to comprehend the human organizational structure is:
Individual > family > tribe > village > city state based on the same ethnicity
The 'nation' is an entirely ethnic construct. Without a homogeneous population or ethnocentric majority, a nation does NOT exist.
I agree with your hierarchy here.
But I don't see why the issues you mention are relevant on an individual basis. Individuals come first, and the environment is too hostile they can find ways to have their way within it or move to a new environment that allows them to live their life and pursue their goals freely. With an authoritarian government one has to worry about government overreach. With Soros one can just play their life out as it were. There will always be people with different objectives obstructing their path, but Soros is a much lesser evil than any authoritarian government could potentially be. At least on an individual basis.
George Soros IS an authoritarian government. It's called international Talmudic Jewry. Do you actually believe he sets up fake NGOs in nations all across the globe in order to try and destabilize them by importing infinite 3rd world Nigerians by himself?
? Italy, Russia, UK, etc; you really believe he single handedly navigates around Italian and Russian mafias circumventing all their power structures as a single outsider? The routes are media, banks, UN, IMF, World Bank, CFR, etc. Just because they don't wave an easily identifiable flag around when they destroy your nation doesn't mean they don't exist.
The worst is the complete idiots like Beto O'Rourke and Justin Trudeau who pretend they're on some type of 'exclusive', 'elite' team when they're just being played as useful idiot, empty suit frontmen to destroy their own countries.
I don't know enough about the details, but would be surprised if our problems weren't mostly deliberate in ways at least similar to what you describe.
However. George Soros can't show up at my door and tell me what I can and can't do. An authoritarian government on the other hand can dictate most aspects of my life and forbid me from leaving the country.
As is, I can just fly over to Japan when shit hits the fan here, where none of the Western problems exist. Sure, they have that whole birth rate and aging population issue. But that's clearly being solved by them (and not anywhere as bad as in South Korea in the first place). They also have work ethics that are unhealthy to say the least. But I'm wealthy enough not to care about that at this point. The biggest problem over there would be the illegality of recreational substance use, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't a safe travel destination in the west to play that game from time to time. Not that it would matter if things got so bad that I'd actually have to move. Some things take priority over exploring the space of human consciousness and experience.
I'm not saying that people like Soros aren't a blight on the world. But I still don't see how they're comparable to obvious authoritarian governments. Unless his end-goal was to destroy all countries. Which he is too old to accomplish anyways.