Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11372. (Read 26725479 times)

hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
Yeah, but India is one of the most populated places on earth. Fix India and teach them sanitation and you've got a clean Ganges. Shitting in my toilet doesn't mean that yours is about to get dirty though. Just like an ant colony shitting in my backyard won't pollute that of my neighbour.

One big oil tanker crashing and leaking can cause a lot of damage even in less populated areas (e.g. Alaska 1989).
I'm not saying it's not "a lot" of damage, I'm saying it's not necessarily a lot in terms relative to the global scale. Unless you can show how humans fuck up even unpopulated areas beyond repair that's really not very relevant to "earth". What you have shown so far were examples comparable to a tiny itch on your pinky.

On local scales I agree, humans are retarded and should be more careful. Mostly because you don't want to live in a house filled with trash either.


But the doomsday narrative is unproven, potentially inaccurate and for now mostly political garbage.

Politicians will tell you what you want to hear, and a narrative that destroys our planet is of great interest to everyone. Large swabs of science and politics are just as much under a blanket as big corporations and governments are, so don't just buy everything. Especially media headlines.

I'm not trying to be a cunt here, but it's important not to talk about things you don't even remotely understand the scope of as if they were fact. That doesn't help anyone and actively hinders us from identifying the real story.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Btw after a white russian, an amaretto Appi, 3th white wine ......

But still i see BTC please other direction (sultans of swing live band.... not original but always good ) Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 2058
Merit: 578
No God or Kings, only BITCOIN.

^Still in need of 58 sM to wear a hat like you guys,it take too long though.


^^^^^ In case if anyone want to help with that. Grin

Now only in need of 46sM...

You'll get there buddy! Just needs to be more active I guess WO will able to help you somehow.

I've been out for weeks and miss the ups and downs as well. It's good to be back. Road to WO hat!
legendary
Activity: 2145
Merit: 1660
We choose to go to the moon
While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
Yeah, but India is one of the most populated places on earth. Fix India and teach them sanitation and you've got a clean Ganges. Shitting in my toilet doesn't mean that yours is about to get dirty though. Just like an ant colony shitting in my backyard won't pollute that of my neighbour.

One big oil tanker crashing and leaking can cause a lot of damage even in less populated areas (e.g. Alaska 1989).
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Beeconnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect is the real Bitcorn.

Still i think that Carlos matos character was hilarious really laught with him
Agree, I re-watched that part countless times. Very charismatic guy, too bad he associated with scammers (although otherwise we wouldn't have the memes, so hmmmmmm).
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue.

The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense.

NASA is a big business centre.

I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says:

• the earth is flat

•  the moon landings were faked

• cigarettes don’t cause cancer

So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.  It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.

What about those that says XRP is the best coin??

Or Bcash = the real Bitcoin

What about those?
Beeconnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect is the real Bitcorn.

Still i think that Carlos matos character was hilarious really laught with him
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
Yeah, but India is one of the most populated places on earth. Fix India and teach them sanitation and you've got a clean Ganges. Shitting in my toilet doesn't mean that yours is about to get dirty though. Just like an ant colony shitting in my backyard won't pollute that of my neighbour.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?

its not that, its more like the #MeToo movement

"We are all Satoshi" because nobody knows.


Think this in reverse...…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ

Hey where was that pic please ??
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue.

The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense.

NASA is a big business centre.

I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says:

• the earth is flat

•  the moon landings were faked

• cigarettes don’t cause cancer

So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.  It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.

What about those that says XRP is the best coin??

Or Bcash = the real Bitcoin

What about those?
Beeconnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect is the real Bitcorn.
legendary
Activity: 2145
Merit: 1660
We choose to go to the moon
While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
I said numbers. But you don't have any. So you throw out random bullshit in an attempt to distract people and cover up the fact that your position is objectively wrong.

Why do you keep thinking you can get away with this? We have been through this clown circus too many times by now.

Go argue it with NASA.  Tell them about your rat theory revelation.  I am sure they will be fascinated.
His rat theory actually has merit.

And even without rats we've known about this for a long time.

It's called population models and they're the first thing you study when learning about differential equations.

Populations start decreasing for one reason or another once they get too large and then either disappear or return to an equilibrium state.

How this plays out in practice is not understood for humans, because we're the most new phenomenon on this planet and thus have no data to compare with.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.
LOL how?

1. How could you deny the environmental pollution causing by the industrial smokes, cars etc?
2. How could you deny the fact that we are destroying the environmental ecosystem by cutting the forests?[/b]
3. How could you deny that we are killing animals and imbalancing the entire food chain?
4. How could you deny the climate change?
5. How could you deny the increased sea level?

Do you know what will happen if the last bee dies?
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjID1ugr1fo
1. On a local scale, sure. And while China is clearly fucked, I'm perfectly healthy over here in Europe. Including all the wildlife around me.
2. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/tree-growth-increasing-world-climate-change/
3. Fair claim. Animals are disappearing. And I don't like it either because I like animals more than the average human.
4. Climate change happens every second even without human intervention. That's why we have weather.
5. Sea levels were higher in the past than they are now. It just depends on how you pick your data.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
^
My last one brother
Hope you get Some more luck Smiley
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom

^Still in need of 58 sM to wear a hat like you guys,it take too long though.


^^^^^ In case if anyone want to help with that. Grin

Now only in need of 46sM...
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
I said numbers. But you don't have any. So you throw out random bullshit in an attempt to distract people and cover up the fact that your position is objectively wrong.

Why do you keep thinking you can get away with this? We have been through this clown circus too many times by now.
To be fair, both of you argue the same way. Just from opposing positions. I suppose I wasn't the only one getting tired of even trying to have a conversation on here at times.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?

its not that, its more like the #MeToo movement

"We are all Satoshi" because nobody knows.


Think this in reverse...…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
This data is irrelevant to the question. It shows that earth is warming, but if you check the paper of my previous post you can see that this is potentially perfectly normal behaviour. Your link does not show that CO2 causes warming and it only covers a laughably small time scale. Life on earth has been around for far more than the 100ish years on that table.

If anything, the link you provide does not discredit the claim that scientists could be milking government grants with real, but irrelevant and falsely interpreted data.

And I say that as a strong believer in what NASA has done in the past. I don't know what they're up to these days, but I'm certainly grateful for all the things they've come up with to indirectly enrich all of our lives.
legendary
Activity: 2145
Merit: 1660
We choose to go to the moon
Oh, and climate change is primarily driven by the sun. It changes distance and levels of activity all the time.

Sun is a very big and very stable system.
Jump to: