Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11373. (Read 26725474 times)

legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?https://i.ibb.co/9n20X4t/IMG-20190310-164901-758.jpg

What if i am satoshi Tongue

But f*** i’m getting bored sometimes (i see many WO’s are getting bored :/ )

I start to miss China and the PBOC.......

Who else ? Smiley

Lucky i found myself a PERFECT spot with ??

via Imgflip Meme Generator
^
Indeed with a beverage Cheesy
And hope Some Will follow

Cheers my HODLing WO bro’s
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.

According to the Chinese government, there is no link between cigarettes and cancer. Western cigarette companies continue to argue in US courts that the link between cancer and cigarettes is only speculative.

Do you agree that cancer being caused by cigarettes is an unproven hypothesis?
I know that there are people who chain smoke and live happy healthy lives well into their 80s and 90s.

Whether you'll get cancer depends on many factors, such as your genetic make-up, your mentality, and your overall lifestyle.

So no, it's not proven that cigarettes de facto cause cancer. They correlate with an increased risk of such, the reasons for which are not fully understood. If they were we would've identified a counter-mechanism to it by now.


This is the problem with science and people who don't understand statistics arguing about it by the way. This includes most scientists who never studied statistics rigorously and only know how to run shitty t-tests and compute confidence intervals, σ-values and whatnot.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

This would also make overpopulation (@Ibian) irrelevant if humans were smart enough to focus on figuring out how to relocate people too dumb to not concentrate in cities they can not even afford to live in.


For climate, here's an interesting paper that claims that CO2 is preceded by global warming, as opposed to causing it. It also claims alternating periods of warming and cooling. Here's a link: https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804588-6.00009-4
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.
This is, currently, fact. And the fact that science has been politicized and commercialized in a way that fundamentally goes against the scientific method is more problematic than any environmental issues that we face. With science we can rebuild anything, without it we're just straight up fucked.
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Poor lil Warren. Imagine being a market guru all your life and all of a sudden missing on #bitcoin

$2051 invested in Bitcoin (at Bitcoin pizza prices) are worth $1,000,000,000 today.

Of course he is not a fan.

#shortWarren Long Bitcoin

https://twitter.com/hodlgames/status/1104779950408765442?s=21
To be fair, the guy is a genius when it comes to traditional investments. Not that that means much in a world full of people who don't know what compound interest is.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Can someone translate what this tables says?

https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1104635332274749446

Wondering how much more they have left to liquidate at $4k

$33 million worth.  In other words, Bitmain is worth about 12% of the Quadriga exit scam.




This makes me very happy. Thank you for posting. Gotta love karma dealing lefts and rights.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
As a Mathematician I believe in (the power of) both. And I've seen enough to know that we don't know shit about climate.


I'll be the first to say that it's completely and utterly retarded to clutter oceans and the environment with our plastic waste and other garbage.

However, climate is a whole different ball park that is comparable to trying to understand the human brain. This shit is just far too complex for our current data collecting and processing methods, even if we had a perfect model for it (which we most certainly do not).
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
It occurs to me that there is something infantile about resorting to an appeal to authority as a debate tactic. It's the small child that says "oh yeah, well MY dad says...".

Oh, and climate change is primarily driven by the sun. It changes distance and levels of activity all the time. And the number one greenhouse gas is water.

As tempting as it is to debate the anti-vaxxer sewing circle, I am gonna let this one go. 
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?

More likely them than CSW.
full member
Activity: 480
Merit: 129
HODL
Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
It occurs to me that there is something infantile about resorting to an appeal to authority as a debate tactic. It's the small child that says "oh yeah, well MY dad says...".

Oh, and climate change is primarily driven by the sun. It changes distance and levels of activity all the time. And the number one greenhouse gas is water.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1799
Cлaвa Укpaїнi!

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.
LOL how?

How could you deny the environmental pollution causing by the industrial smokes, cars etc?
How could you deny the fact that we are destroying the environmental ecosystem by cutting the forests?
How could you deny that we are killing animals and imbalancing the entire food chain?
How could you deny the climate change?
How could you deny the increased sea level?

Do you know what will happen if the last bee dies?
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjID1ugr1fo

First of all, we are talking about the thing that was previously called global warming. They have changed the name now, mainly because the warming has the audacity to not appear.

Secondly, polluting emissions are just a fraction of what they were in the developed world when I was born.

Thirdy, We have actually had a reforestation, not the opposite https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/tree-cover-increase-world-deforestation-farming-rainforests-forests-a8486096.html
https://news.mongabay.com/2018/08/earth-has-more-trees-now-than-35-years-ago/

Fourthly, I have never denied that we are killing animals, I eat meat on a daily basis. "Imbalancing the entire foodchain" is just too vague too mean anything.

Fifthly, I'm not denying climate change, I'm denying that it is caused by humans. And that the hypothesis behind it is not proven. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2171973/Tree-ring-study-proves-climate-WARMER-Roman-Medieval-times-modern-industrial-age.html#ixzz20MYka5fG
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120709092606.htm

Sixthly, The sea levels increase by approximately 2-3 mm yearly, and have been doing so for several hundred years, no significant increase is taking place.

I do not know what will happen if the last bee dies, but I do know that the collapsing beehives seem to be under control in Europe, It seems like it was caused by a invading Asian mite and pesticides, mainly nicotinoids, they are now banned or about to be banned.
However, this is a temporary dip, the population is recovering as we speak, and most importantly, what has that got to do with climate change?
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1230
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.

Very good.

This happens when you fck with Bitcoin.

Indeed, Jihan will be working as a male prostitute at 100k party   Grin
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2053
Free spirit


Do you know what will happen if the last bee dies?



Its natural, they will just be replaced with swarms of hummingbirds
legendary
Activity: 3620
Merit: 4813
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
Hahaha shit some new rules to add
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1230
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue.

The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense.

NASA is a big business centre.

I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says:

• the earth is flat

•  the moon landings were faked

• cigarettes don’t cause cancer

So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.  It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.

What about those that says XRP is the best coin??

Or Bcash = the real Bitcoin

What about those?

Poor guys, I really sympathize with them...  Grin
Jump to: