Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11418. (Read 26726429 times)

3 letter agencies could identify you based on: payment information (if using a credit card or most crypto), GPS and cell tower tracking data, recorded conversations, text, emails, website & web services logins, wifi network data, etc.

Roach might be a fucktard in a lot of ways, but he is not very far off in his description of what Bob did in terms of selling a large quantity of BTC (and likely some of the other forked coins and shit coins too above $10k - which is not exactly "near the top" but at much higher prices than todays prices). 

Of course, Roach seems to be engaged in a decent amount of exaggeration but in terms of saying that Bob sold at the top, when instead Bob sold a couple of times when the BTC price was falling in the $14k and $12k territory, and including some of the forks and shitcoins, too, but then again, Bob said that he had bought some of those back too, so there is some ambiguity regarding exactly what Bob was doing to the extent that matters. 

In essence Bob was being a bit of a emotional drama queen on a regular basis during that time about what to do in terms of selling some of his BTC to meet some of his tax obligations, and yeah, it was supposedly in the millions of dollars which likely causes more legitimate ammunition for people like roach to call him a hypocrite...  even though I doubt that Bob was trying to purposefully trick guys by doing the opposite, even though Roach's conclusion in that regard is speculation of motive, anyhow, and part of the ammunition comes from Bob's own drama and another part came from of the kind of bragging quality of likely sharing too much information about amount of BTC holdings. 

The total quantity of the BTC holdings of many members here was only a fraction of the total amount that Bob claimed to be selling - including Bob's own admission on several occasions of first world problems.

So, like I mentioned in a previous post, there seems to be some ambiguity that Roach complaining about V8's negative trust of him, because I doubt that Roach's exaggerations about Bob rise to the level of non-factual, even though Roach is guilty of a lot of other shilling and trolling that would, in themselves, justify giving negative trust. 

Tell me how exactly a phone is going to know your name and other relevant information if you don't have a contract that links it to you. Or any accounts that contain information on your identity. Cause I'm pretty sure that AI isn't advanced enough to guess solely based on behaviour or otherwise read your mind right now.

Lets give him some respect. It's Asshole-San

Seconded. I have a pretty good memory and I remember BLB's discussion around 11K very well.

So lies shall be substituted for truth, complete with fabricated evidence, and you are just fine with it. Defending it, even. Shame on you, too.

PAMP IT!

Do you have the brain of a flea?

If he's upset that implies that he lost more money to the bear market than he gained from selling at or near the top to cover expenses. Otherwise he'd be ecstatic about the opportunity to reload his bags with around five times the amount of coins that he held previously.

Edit: Just saw Bob's post which renders this whole thing irrelevant on two fronts now.

I am presuming $3,333 per month as a starting point (that presumes making a quarterly withdrawal at a BTC price of $3,122), and a likelihood that BTC is going to increase in value more than 4% per year from that $3122 starting point, so that presumed increase in BTC value would therefore cause the baseline assumption of passive income level to go up, too. 

I am also kind of presuming that our current 80% correction level in BTC prices is largely going to be at or near the bottom of this particular cycle, but the $3,333 does allow you some consideration of how low it could go, at least currently with the starting of 320.307495 BTC, so there seems to be really good chances that it is NOT going to take long for the $3,333 to go up, and even cashing out for three months today at $3,900, for example, would be 3.20307495 that would give you $12,492 for the quarter, and $4,164 for the next three months.

I just think for passive income that is a really great amount in which you don't have to do shit to earn it, and the only labor is keeping track of it and figuring out a way to live within that amount.

   I do agree that $3,333 is easier for a single person, and a bit more difficult to support a family, but again it is passive income. 

i also agree that if you want to fund some kind of self-fulfilling project, then that goes beyond entry level basics for fuck you status that is a bit of different story too that is particular to what you consider as desirable in terms of the "fuck you-ness" of having a passive income that requires absolutely no work from you...   

Let me see if I can describe what I mean by basic level entry level "fuck you-ness." 

Yes, even if you only have 320.307495 BTC, there are going to be people who have more money than you, but I presume that those people are working in the ratt race for their money.  You don't have to work for them, for anyone else or listen to them.
 You can spend your time going to the beach or pursuing whatever project that you want to pursue (I guess as long as it either does not cost anything or it funds itself).  So what if some of these people have more money than you?  You still can say "fuck you," because you have enough money to eat, pay for rent, pay for expenses and have an emergency fund, and you are getting your money whether anyone likes it or not.  You have power over your own self and your hours of the day. 

Now, of course, if you want to have power over others or over some project that you want to fund, then that goes beyond pure basic entry level personal fuck you-ness. 

Like you mentioned, in that case, either your project is going to fund itself or you have to increase the quantity of your BTC in order to fund that project - like you said from 320 to 640 BTC would cause the dollar value to be $6,666 rather than $3,333, or you have to double the BTC price from $3,122 to $6,244, which would achieve the same doubling of income results. 

I was referring to "fuck you" as a personal statement and not a statement of wanting to create some kind of an extra self-fulfilling project.. that is like an additional layer of luxury that goes beyond the basics and is personal to you, and would not be within the entry level of "fuck you" status that I had been attempting to outline and conceive at the "any person" level.

Mic, show us your pics from El Nido, Palawan in the Philippines. It looks very nice, but I have read that some of the 'tours' only give you about 45 minutes in any one place.

Yes, you have been very open and coherent about it in your post history. I, obviously, can't attest if everything you say is true even if I personally believe it is. But you have always been very clear and verbose about your stash dealings. In fact it has been very interesting and instructional to learn about your experience... which is something many of us would like to be able to sorta replicate in the future if everything goes "according to the plan".

r0ach is just vomiting his bullshit one more time. Nothing to see here.

^ See what I mean?

Antifragile.

And it is already Thursday here...

I agree with you that your post in that reference, does not seem to rise to the level of red trust in terms of liar or disinformation expert...

If I were to negative trust you, then I would likely tag you for shilling, pumping PMs, some of your bullshit racial comments or something like that.... and maybe your pumping of certain off topic BTC themes and then not backing up your shit stirring nonsense...  ... so perhaps, the problem with the negative trust could be with the reference rather than the fact that V8 negative trusted you. 

 I do believe that best practice for red trust is to provide some kind of decent substantiating reference... it is not absolutely necessary, but it is preferred to put a reference. 

So, in my personal opinion, there are still likely decent references out there for the point(s) that V8 was attempting to make in his red trust rationale, so perhaps V8 just used a bad reference?  I am not sure. 

Even though I would use a different referenced example, V8 has discretion about what reference he believes substantiates his negative trust decision... and from my seeing your posts, over the years, the overall decision to red trust you does not seem unreasonable - even if V8 seemed to have picked a less than stellar example of his point(s).

Can't win it either. JJG is antifragile.

Unless it's JJg on a Thursday.

The new spiderman had a good one of those with the beer gut.

You keep telling yourself that. and your CPU hasn't been compromised for decades either.

Yeah you’re right i quoted him yet a time to much.....

I never really understood the term "Fuck You Money", I never needed anything behind me to say Fuck you to anybody. AAMOF I have told a few bosses to fuck off and never seen a reprisal for it. I make myself very clear wherever I have worked. I guess I'm rather lucky that I am not easily replaced.

^ And you are a completely dumb retard. He did in fact sell "millions"... So what? He even *ANNOUNCED IT BEFOREHAND!*

Go read the posts history if you can't recall FFS!