Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11421. (Read 26726328 times)

There's no thought-police in Bitcoin. You send me a clean tx with standard fees and I'll mine it. I couldn't care less about your "purpose".

Well, probably yes. Because it wasn't created with the main purpose of destroying Bitcoin. Although the fact that the coin is designed for manipulation is undeniable.

Mother of dragons this is dull.

Is Binance coin superior to Bitcoin Cash?

July 3, 2014.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7664884

From where do you get your information?

I thought that currently the MTGOX situation is kind of stagnant, waiting for possible resolution of the Peter Vessenes claims.  If the Peter Vessenes were to be resolved, then the next step would be distribution... which maybe it is too optimistic to believe that the Peter Vessenes claims can be resolved in any kind of reasonably prompt manner?

Lots of weak men have been & gone - Only the strongest remain.

I’ll be directing the film, who wants to star in it?

Anyone that has actually capitulated wouldn't even be here anymore.

https://www.newsbtc.com/2019/03/06/samsung-galaxy-s10-bitcoin-ethereum/
Samsung Galaxy S10 Arrives Sans Bitcoin, Only Ethereum is Supported

And yet still accurate.

No, it is not. That has been photoshopped. In order to spread confusion and hate. And to gaslight the community. Just as the text  -- note: NOT the images thereupon, including the TLA logo -- insinuates.

Again - shame on you.

Beware May 2019...I think that is the month mt. gox is expected to dump BTC. Likely the 'asshole' managing stuff will do so on exchanges again IMHO.

just saying, we need to keep the volume up to eat that 'feast' when it hits the world.

It is one thing to dislike a character for things that character has said.

It is entirely something different to falsely attribute to some character things that that character has not said, and then use that as a form of character assassination.

If you think this is somehow honorable or funny, then shame on you.

It is early to talk about spring weather considering the market conditions. Better to wait for strict movement in the market.

Is that available on kindle? ^

We do not need to ponder your stupid ass possibility because it is just a bullshit speculative talking point that is based in fantasy.

Segwit was already passed and implemented in August 2017 with overwhelming consensus, so by the time, the spamming started intensively between early December 2017 until about the end of January 2018, there was no real turning back from that segwit implementation.

The stupid-ass spam were last gasp attempts by some of your BIG BLOCKER nutjobs to both confuse the narrative, and to attempt to perpetuate high fees/slow transaction time talking points, which they still employ to this day, even though those talking points have little basis in reality beyond the time-frame that they were employing their late 2017/early 2018 spam attack.  

They stopped spamming because it was both costing them way too much and it was turning out to be counter-productive including the fact that lightning network ended up going live way sooner than what would have likely otherwise happened, absent the then spam attack.

By the way, fuck your attempt at NOT defining that scenario as spamming the network - even if there were a lot of transactions with fees, those transactions were malicious attempts to block transactions, increase fees facilitating BIG BLOCKER nutjob talking points.  Therefore, spam (even though quite costly) done for political attack and sabotaging purposes rather than legitimately attempting to use bitcoin's blockchain.   So fuck your attempts to categorize attacks on the bitcoin blockchain as legitimate uses just because they are paying fees.

Something seems wrong about this message, especially the beginning line.. " I used to use bitcoin"... lightning network uses bitcoin... so it seems a bit of mixed message to imply that bitcoin and lightning are different things - instead that lightning supplements bitcoin.

Look at the picture below. It's his slide that he found himself working for the government (and maybe the devil himself).

then you would have a roger ver complex.

There is no need to attempt to have that level of control or that level of filthy richness, unless you have some kind of insecurities.

Of course, running a business might be another thing. Recall that at one point, the Winkelvi Bros had proclaimed to have a goal to own 1% of the total BTC, and I think that they had been assessed to owning more than 100k BTC.  Of course, they had put some of those coins as collateral in their ETF applications, so in terms of having business aspirations, there may be some utility in squirreling a lot of BTCs.. but for regular people, it is difficult to imagine scenarios in which you would need to accumulate more than 10,000BTC.. and still be projected as filthy rich.... even though currently, with such holdings, you may be only bordering on filthy rich....

Even 100BTC is likely to cause a decently good cushion in the future, even though right now, such holdings might not be enough to give up the day job.. even though 1000BTC would likely be enough for most regular people to currently give up their day job and to weather any downturn, including a possibility that BTC could drop below $2k in the coming year (probably less than a 40% chance, currently).

Gentlemen you saw  Roger Ver's t lecture presented at the Satoshi's Vision Conference?
If not, you can read it here.