Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11858. (Read 26707935 times)

I tried.

I did not know that I was participating in this forum to be "supportive" of crazy?  Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?

You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.

I am not saying you are wrong in your narrative. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.

I don't know if anyone, including the developers, expect it to be worth much. It's more of a proof of concept of a technology they want to push onto bitcoin.

The whole situation seems strange to me.

If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread?  Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position.  She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.

Where's the volume though?

https://twitter.com/DriveMarkets/status/1085345397025910784

I hope this has not been posted before:
https://medium.com/coinmonks/bitcoins-logarithmic-growth-rates-facebook-s-s-curve-and-future-projections-22d8acaaa801

Ok.... Now that I read that again, I recall seeing it.

It seems like a bit of an over-leveraging, but not necessarily a bad one.  Each of us needs to make those kinds of decisions, and not necessarily kick ourselves if we teeter on one side or another.

I recall that in about late 2014/early 2015, I was teetering on whether I should divert some of my 401k investment into bitcoin.  At the time, I was more than 50% in the red in bitcoin, and I figured that such a diversion of merely a portion of my 401k could more than double my BTC holdings.  In the end, I decided NOT to do it because I had already gotten to a level of investment in bitcoin that was beyond my initial projection of what I was going to do.  So I could not really justify taking a larger stake, which would rise to the level of a kind of excessive gambling, in my thinking.  I continued to dollar cost average and to attempt to invest fairly high amounts of my spare cash flow into bitcoin, and I considered that what I was doing was more than enough "overleveraging" because it also allowed me to feel comfortable with my soon thereafter decision to sell on the way up (my current practice of selling on the way up and buying on the way down with ongoing dollar cost averaging into bitcoin of any extra income that I get).  So, I never really feel bad to shave off a bit of sales of bitcoin, here and there, because I already feel a bit "overleveraged," but NOT overleveraged so much as to have taken out of my 401k.  Anyhow, my point is that there can be a variety of ways to still achieve a kind of overleveraging approach while NOT breaking the bank, so to speak.

From the Wikipedia link, referencing Mythbusters:

Hmmmm, if you say so maybe I am wrong....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory_gunfire

Time to do some study about it...

P.S.: It looks like the most dangerous it is when it is shoot at an angle (parabolic trajectory), as expected, not straight up in the air. But yeah, it seems real people have died or been injured due to it.

Good night mate

Mixed thought: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097875.new#new

Good night into far HODLspace

just wrong

Fatalities from falling bullets are all too frequent. The classic scenario is middle eastern wedding celebrations where falling lead kills a member of the party.  Happens too much.

Careful, this guy apparently has been citing himself for his sourcing of this information.

https://www.ccn.com/fake-news-why-russia-is-probably-not-planning-a-10-billion-bitcoin-buy/

Edit:
Sorry if this has been already addressed.

“A lot of families will complain that their mum or dad, although frail, went into residential care still alert and within a month are like a zombie,”

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/15/nursing-homes-turning-residents-into-zombies-aged-care-royal-commission-to-hear

I don't get the point of that article. It says that looking for any correlations is going to find some, no matter what. So what? Correlation is not causation. Making sense of the (confirmed) correlations one finds requires insight, that's all.

Indeed, it will be the Zimbabwean dollar of crypto.

Thanks, I may well do

the times you see the posters from meta throwing 20-30-40-50 to each other is not any better ..... (I know I have been getting some big loads as well from generous guys in here.... but I do try to spread them around, it just must be to people I think are in here with best intentions and coiners)