check jbreher's avatar text
Define irony..
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11861. (Read 26708631 times)
January 15, 2019, 11:42:25 PM
check jbreher's avatar text
Define irony..
January 15, 2019, 11:38:30 PM
check jbreher's avatar text
Define irony..
Public service announcement:
Lose = be deprived of or cease to have or retain (something).
Loose = not firmly or tightly fixed in place; detached or able to be detached.
Lose = be deprived of or cease to have or retain (something).
Loose = not firmly or tightly fixed in place; detached or able to be detached.
Edited- Thank you grammar poolice.
January 15, 2019, 11:32:47 PM
Liverpool family treats New Zealand beach like they treat their home, gets deported
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/tourists-speak-out-deportation-looms
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/tourists-speak-out-deportation-looms
Well, they are travelers, I hate those guys.
Every summer we have travelers from England driving along the countryside in Sweden trying to "fix a roof" or "Laying asphalt" or some other stuff like that. They do a bad job and ask for excessive payment and and dump their trash everywhere and threaten people who complain.
Every summer there are warnings about these guys in the paper.
Pikey bastards
January 15, 2019, 11:22:00 PM
Where's the volume though?
We have to allow for the risk that we do not get a volume event this time. Or maybe we get a volume bounce off the 200 Weekly MA which sits at $3250.
This is still very much an untested hypothesis.
Edit: the technicals still say we are sitting in a confirmed downtrend. But that's not the point. We are trying to predict the bottom before it shows in the technicals.
Hairbearie... are you starting to smoke from the same batch of UP hopium as some of the rest of us HODLers?
January 15, 2019, 11:19:25 PM
During the run up to $19k, I had a guy ask me donate some bitcoin to a good cause, because he knew that I was rich. 
Bonkers.
You are not SO rich
The substantive fact about "rich" is not as important to the story as is the perception of "rich." In other words, there was some perception (or expectation) that I had some kind of duty to help out here on the interwebs.
January 15, 2019, 11:16:05 PM
I don't think anyone cares about Bakkt one way or another at this point.
What ever happened to everyone who was pouring their tiny hopes into bakkt and etf bringing about the early 2019 bullrun? Y hopium gone?
January 15, 2019, 11:14:25 PM
So, how many grins will ever be made?
all of them
January 15, 2019, 11:01:12 PM
check jbreher's avatar text
January 15, 2019, 11:01:02 PM
I don't think anyone cares about Bakkt one way or another at this point.
January 15, 2019, 10:57:06 PM
Where's the volume though?
We have to allow for the risk that we do not get a volume event this time. Or maybe we get a volume bounce off the 200 Weekly MA which sits at $3250.
This is still very much an untested hypothesis.
Can this perhaps be connected the delayed bakkt launch?
January 15, 2019, 10:54:21 PM
Where's the volume though?
We have to allow for the risk that we do not get a volume event this time. Or maybe we get a volume bounce off the 200 Weekly MA which sits at $3250.
This is still very much an untested hypothesis.
Edit: the technicals still say we are sitting in a confirmed downtrend. But that's not the point. We are trying to predict the bottom before it shows in the technicals.
January 15, 2019, 10:33:58 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.
I am not saying you are wrong. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.
I did not know that I was participating to be "supportive" of crazy? Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?
I tried.
During the run up to $19k, I had a guy ask me donate some bitcoin to a good cause, because he knew that I was rich.
Bonkers.
You are not SO rich
January 15, 2019, 10:32:59 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.
I am not saying you are wrong. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.
I did not know that I was participating to be "supportive" of crazy? Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?
I tried.
During the run up to $19k, I had a guy ask me donate some bitcoin to a good cause (which was a mutual acquaintance who had made some bad financial decisions in then recent times), because he knew that I was rich.
January 15, 2019, 10:31:24 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.
I am not saying you are wrong. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.
I did not know that I was participating to be "supportive" of crazy? Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?
I tried.
January 15, 2019, 10:30:38 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.
I am not saying you are wrong. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.
I did not know that I was participating in this forum to be "supportive" of crazy? Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?
January 15, 2019, 10:27:43 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
You could be way more helpful if you used your logic to support our fellow good-standing members.
I am not saying you are wrong in your narrative. Just trying that you see it from another more positive and supportive point of view.
January 15, 2019, 10:22:14 PM
So what's the plan guys? If Grin works out well, bitcoin devs shove all that tech onto bitcoin?
https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/master/doc/grin4bitcoiners.md
https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/master/doc/grin4bitcoiners.md
I don’t know that you could port Bitcoin onto Grin. So it is a threat.
But their monetary policy is fuxxed. Big mistake having an endless emissions. Same trap Monero fell into.
So that significantly reduces the threat.
MW can be implemented on a second layer or as a sidechain with BTC I believe.
So, how many grins will ever be made?
Currently set to 50 per 60 seconds (it was going to be 60/m, but I think they finalised at 50/m). That is not designed to change. So it's infinite.
Well, if it's infinite it won't be worth anything. That's Economics 101.
I don't know if anyone, including the developers, expect it to be worth much. It's more of a proof of concept of a technology they want to push onto bitcoin.
January 15, 2019, 10:20:41 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-source-message-5097875
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
oh man Globb0 do be careful of those tards over there. they are mindless power-crazed robots. you may have to back down and act contrite and change your ways.
btw love what you were doing of course
It's a pity a random spontaneous act of kindness and generosity can be so heavily criticised instead of just accepted for what it is.
The whole situation seems strange to me.
If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread? Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position. She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.
January 15, 2019, 09:53:25 PM
Bitcoin bottomed around 0400 hours GMT on 14 January 2015.
We are now past that time in this cycle. If the fractal holds, we have bottomed.
I just bought again.
We are now past that time in this cycle. If the fractal holds, we have bottomed.
I just bought again.
Where's the volume though?
Jump to: