Of course, they can't, Billy
A lot of ppl with money remain unhappy
Money only can give you some additional emotions, increase your status & solve some money-based problems
And that's it
True happiness is self-realization and healthy family (relatives)
wdyt?
https://twitter.com/BullyEsq/status/1035182224126214149Money can't "buy" happiness.... but lack of it is surely a great obstacle in reaching or maintaining happiness.
My goal is to reach that point in which I can be reasonably sure I won't ever experience lack of money in my lifetime. No extravagances or overspending needed at all. Just that. So that I can live my life, more or less happy but without that worry.
What is that quantity of value that you would want to accumulate in current dollars?
If we use traditional assumptions that you can afford to withdraw 4% per year from traditionally invested funds without largely losing the principle. That is considered to be a kind of maintenance withdrawal of value to preserve the principle (a kind of withdrawal of interest ONLY thinking).
With that framework, for every $1million dollars, you can expect to garner a withdrawal rate of approximately $3,333 per month (that is ($1million * .04) / 12). Then the question becomes how many million dollars do you need to feel comfortable? For myself, I figure approximately $2.5 million would allow for a decent income that would mostly allow me to continue my current standard of living plus a little bit of cushion.... and actually it would be a bit more than I am used to because I no longer would have to worry about pulling out money for savings/investment because I already arrived at a maintenance stage, rather than an accumulation stage... furthermore, I would become more geographically mobile which could cause for a lot of potential savings because I would no longer have to live in one particular area to maintain a JOB.
Anyhow, with about $2.5 million of principle, the income would be approximately
$10k $8,333 per month (that is 2.5 x $3,333). So that income would largely be considered to be passive income.. and seems reasonable based on a principle of $2.5 million, no?
Of course, depending on what part of the world you live, and your own expectations concerning the lifestyle that you would like to live, there can be considerable variance in how much you feel is reasonable necessary (or preferred) and how much cushion you feel that you need to have, too.
Let's just say that if your quantity of fiat value for your bitcoins had gone up to $2.5million (that's around 125 bitcoins) when bitcoin went up to $20k, but then the value of your bitcoins would only be worth $875,000 today with the price at $7k.. so it is almost as if you would have to consider the lower end of possible BTC price movements in order to feel comfortable leaving your wealth in bitcoin. Let's say that you want to maintain at least $2.5 million in fiat value, but you are actually o.k. if the BTC price were to go down to $2million, then you would have needed to maintain 333 Bitcoins when the BTC price sunk down to $6k in order to maintain at least $2million of value in bitcoins.
I still kind of think that in the future, anything approaching 100 bitcoins should be more than enough to maintain about a $2.5 million dollar value, but then I suppose I am presuming a kind of bitcoin price floor at $25k - even if from time to time the BTC price might have periods of dipping below $25k.
I understand that there are HODLers who are contemplating much smaller BTC holdings - even in the 21 bitcoins territory, but perhaps those folks are kind of expecting a $100k BTC floor prices... which also might not be unreasonable for a longer-term thinking about where BTC has decent chances of going.. and especially if you have a bit more time in your investment horizon and your cashing out (living on passive income) plan.
Edited the passive income numbers due to my earlier miscalculations, and added some clarification here and there.