Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13466. (Read 26719832 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 12
legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew.  

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.

You basically said Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue. That would qualify as an opinion.

Hmm. I guess you know more about my past postings than do I. Link?

Schnorr can obviously reduce the size of txs that have multiple elements. I wouldn't say that is 'nothing'. If this be shown to be a reversal of a previously held opinion, then so be it.

Of course, my final opinion would be driven by an analysis of not merely the benefits of Schnorr, but also its costs.

edit: Oh - I see you've added the link. Thank you. I shall quote:

Quote
Currently it would take over 30 years to send each person on earth a single Bitcoin transaction. Think about that.

Lightning does nothing to alleviate that.
Segwit does nothing to alleviate that.
Schnorr sigs does nothing to alleviate that.

True enough. If you wish to send every person on earth a single Bitcoin tx (e.g., perhaps to open an LN channel), it will take on the order of three decades. And Schnorr indeed does nothing to alleviate that. It is a true statement, and it is not identical to "Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue".

Your assertion is shown to be false.

And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1610
Self made HODLER ✓
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew.  

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.

You basically said Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue. That would qualify as an opinion.

Hmm. I guess you know more about my past postings than do I. Link?

Schnorr can obviously reduce the size of txs that have multiple elements. I wouldn't say that is 'nothing'. If this be shown to be a reversal of a previously held opinion, then so be it.

Of course, my final opinion would be driven by an analysis of not merely the benefits of Schnorr, but also its costs.

edit: Oh - I see you've added the link. Thank you. I shall quote:

Quote
Currently it would take over 30 years to send each person on earth a single Bitcoin transaction. Think about that.

Lightning does nothing to alleviate that.
Segwit does nothing to alleviate that.
Schnorr sigs does nothing to alleviate that.

True enough. If you wish to send every person on earth a single Bitcoin tx (e.g., perhaps to open an LN channel), it will take on the order of three decades. And Schnorr indeed does nothing to alleviate that. It is a true statement, and it is not identical to "Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue".

Your assertion is shown to be false.

After re-reading your post I stand corrected on my interpretation and agree you were referring to a very extreme theoretical scenario where all the block space is used exclusively for opening channels for every person on earth.

I am glad to hear you agree that Schnorr signatures could have some impact on scaling improvement depending on circumstances.
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
Looking good Bitcoin, looking good Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
25-30% efficiency improvement from Schnorr is not 'nothing', but also not earth shaking.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew.  

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.

You basically said Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue. That would qualify as an opinion.

Hmm. I guess you know more about my past postings than do I. Link?

Schnorr can obviously reduce the size of txs that have multiple elements. I wouldn't say that is 'nothing'. If this be shown to be a reversal of a previously held opinion, then so be it.

Of course, my final opinion would be driven by an analysis of not merely the benefits of Schnorr, but also its costs.

edit: Oh - I see you've added the link. Thank you. I shall quote:

Quote
Currently it would take over 30 years to send each person on earth a single Bitcoin transaction. Think about that.

Lightning does nothing to alleviate that.
Segwit does nothing to alleviate that.
Schnorr sigs does nothing to alleviate that.

True enough. If you wish to send every person on earth a single Bitcoin tx (e.g., perhaps to open an LN channel), it will take on the order of three decades. And Schnorr indeed does nothing to alleviate that. It is a true statement, and it is not identical to "Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue".

Your assertion is shown to be false.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1610
Self made HODLER ✓
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew.  

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.

You basically said Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue. That would qualify as an opinion.

P.S.: Here it is: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22571868
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew. 

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 13660
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Sometimes I like to wear a fancy newsboy head when I go out.... but mostly just wear a ball head.



Jtbc...I don't use this particular h.a.t (hair alternative treatment)
I wore it for like 5 minutes and my wife thankfully
clued me in to the fact that I looked like a dork tard.
Bedroom lampshade....


Haha Nice i have very much heads but almost never Where them ...... maybe now the bull and bear head ....
I actually don’t have any BTC clothing except a BTC christmas sweater for the dinner @my girlfriends family house
 Grin
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
the whole thing just makes me schnorr
legendary
Activity: 875
Merit: 1362

"The price of bitcoin surged Monday after a report said that BlackRock has set up a working group to explore ways of taking advantage of the cryptocurrency market.....The world’s most valuable virtual currency by market value jumped more than 4 percent."

Someone needs to tell CNBC that 4% is not a surge in bitcoinland, but a common daily fluctuation.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
Dear Jbear

Please cite from the White Paper.  



god you guys

please don't

Playing pin the tail on the Satoshi should be restricted to birthday parties.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Dear Jbear

Please cite from the White Paper.  

Haha! Fine. Let's play.

Dear HML - please cite the white paper with evidence for your assertions that:
1) "the miners were never intended on being a separate group from the users"
2) "Satoshi didn’t foresee ASICs"

Quote
Hint:  you can’t, because it’s not there other than a reference to SPVs

Hint:  you can’t, because it’s not there. Period.

As for 1), the material on SPV is normative proof that Satoshi was intending to enable non-mining users.
As for 2), if you can't derive from the white paper that units that are 'better' at hashing will be 'more successful' at mining, I don't know what to say.

Quote
In any event, it’s moot because we are where we are with miners holding significant power.  

As per design.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
Sometimes I like to wear a fancy newsboy head when I go out.... but mostly just wear a ball head.



Jtbc...I don't use this particular h.a.t (hair alternative treatment)
I wore it for like 5 minutes and my wife thankfully
clued me in to the fact that I looked like a dork tard.
Bedroom lampshade....
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
Sometimes I like to wear a fancy newsboy head when I go out.... but mostly just wear a ball head.
Jump to: