Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13481. (Read 26719570 times)

Coinbase is 'exploring' adding further shitcoins, which are duly pumping up.

Trump is a hard K, incidentally.

I agree that there may be a bit of a war going on, but your point about POW using a lot of energy makes little sense.  Do you even bitcoin, bro?

Yeah, right.. you are gonna get the forum to reverse its ban decision?  Maybe presenting your ideas in meta would be better, and maybe if you had your own forum, then you could figure out how much trolling you would allow before you took some actions and whether flaunting a previous ban would be good for your forum?  Oh, that's o.k.. just let banned accounts come back and do whatever the fuck they want.     

little sons of bitches, to be flashed like the south korea regulator... no need to play nice with those things... just hardcore... it is sad, but it is a war... ... and pow uses a lot of energy...

What the fuck?

Crypto industry needs to "step up their game"?  What the fuck does that mean?

He seems to consider that bitcoin is some kind of centralized entity?  He truly does not understand bitcoin.. and seems to be describing a feature, rather than a bug.  So if some nefarious players are able to send money around, but that is disempowering to other players, then the other players better figure out some other ways to battle the allegedly "nefarious players."  


Whether I am a leftie or rightie or whatever, you surely beat me to it.   

Just to be clear, he's normally quite negative toward that troll.

you are the shepard guiding us, thank you...

I put him on ignore because he quoted and responded to our resident troll too much.

it's a critical gear as most wild beast now have switch to nocturne lifestyle .

Prep.

Sure he had a solution. The solution basically is for everyone to only use the P2PKH addresses. (The ones that start out with a 1.) Basically it is a rejection by each individual user of the segwit/LN solution to scaling that the Bitcoin Core team has implemented. From what I can extrapolate from his arguments is that BTC is really only meant to be used  as a store of value and to transact with large sums of value. So scaling is not necessary. The wealthy do not mind paying the high transaction fees to move large sums of value around. Also, according to his arguments, the wealthy elite don't want some platform that is going to constantly be changing. They would prefer something that is immutable and demonstrated to be secure. When changes are constantly introduced, it is possible to have some insecure vulnerability be introduced and have some black hat exploit it. If someone wants to use cryptocurrency as a means to handle everyday expenses, then he recommends people just use one of the multitudes of altcoins available.
(Please note that me trying to summarize the gist of what he was getting at should not be construed as a total endorsement by me of what he proposes. Also, I may still be misunderstanding some of his points. So my interpretation may be totally out on left field.  )

are you kidding, mr burns on msnbc want nothing else but to nuke russia... but why? paid by whom? or his conditionning provided by whom? I think it's hate for the possibility of an ethnowhite state... they hate this idea... afraid of space colonization in partnership with the chineses? who knows... one sure thing, mr burns (a white guy) hate white people... when I say hate, it's hitler hate level.

Certainly, I take any posts and posters with a BIG ass grain of salt, and I think that any of us are better protected when we might misstate our own situation a bit or to present some hypothetical numbers, rather than our actual holdings. 

At the same time, there are some truths that come out.. and some flaunting of consumer goods in order to emphasize that aspect of bitcoin.  Do you remember mtech or whatever the fuck his name was.. he comes back from time to time, but surely he was somewhat correct, when he sold his whole stash on the way down  from $1200 to $200, and he supposedly sold around $600 - but he was still lording it over folks and trolling the fuck out of the thread and saying how rich he was, blah blah blah... Those peeps need to be called out and challenged, no?  Sometimes they do come around and sometimes they do buy back in at lower prices, but frequently the message from those kinds of folks tends to be aimed to troll and to act like they know more than everyone else (and suggest bitcoin is dying, blah blah blah) rather than to really attempt to contribute to any kind of meaningful bitcoin conversation.

How do you intend to see the night boobies?

Pretty sure he nukes himself.

You also suck at controlling your emotion, which means that we can almost never rely on you to keep your word to sell all your BTC and to never come back... hahahahhahahaha...

You are going to be in and out of bitcoin as long as you have free will to hit the "buy" button. So, yeah, we are likely stuck with you, and your many seemingly pumping and dumping warts, too.   

Please, shelby has more IQ then the population of the city where you live - together.

If you dont see the value in his posts i cant really help.

The multiposting was a bit annoying, but he got punished for it and it should be fine now.

If your newly appointed, then your rule might be to make america great again, whatever the fuck means?   

Can we please get some "representatives" who aren't ignorant pieces of shit?



("...says the guy with the Donald Trump avatar." I beat you lefties to it.)