Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 14517. (Read 26608013 times)

hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.
"More than one-quarter of the total homeless population nationwide lives in California, roughly 114,000. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national-increase.html

State with roughly 50% more Democrats than Republicans. So your comment doesn't seem to hold under scrutiny.

You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego?  Choose one.  
I don't know what either of those places look like. And it has no bearing on the argument. You've made a remark, and I've demonstrated it to be false.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Also, since I'm not from the US I'm not fully aware of what is going on in that first world shithole. But wasn't California the same place that talked about cutting itself off from the rest of the US and become independent when Trump took office?
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.
"More than one-quarter of the total homeless population nationwide lives in California, roughly 114,000. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national-increase.html

State with roughly 50% more Democrats than Republicans. So your comment doesn't seem to hold under scrutiny.

You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego?  Choose one. 
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.
"More than one-quarter of the total homeless population nationwide lives in California, roughly 114,000. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national-increase.html

State with roughly 50% more Democrats than Republicans. So your comment doesn't seem to hold under scrutiny.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
The average alt-right is an angry, unemployed, single white male. Mostly they are just losers.  So a bit hard for them to have polyamorous relationships when they are incapable of having any relationship.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
And that's why they should be taken away from the mother. Her lack of responsibility will cause long lasting damage to her children as opposed to short lived grief. It's not like they can't see her whatsoever, and it's certainly not like they can't go live with her once they're of legal age. So there's no reason to risk further damage by having an irresponsible twat raise those kids. And since we're on a Bitcoin forum here, I'm sure we all know where the dice fall in terms of short versus long.

And as far as child support goes. No. Not everyone else comes second. He did not father the boys so he should not be forced to pay for them. That's called theft. No matter how hard you try to reason it away.

Sure, giant foster homes...that has worked good in the past and other countries today (not) ... see how well that worked in the 20's and 30's ... taking kids away from unwed mothers


There's a difference between unwed mothers and pathological liars and cheaters. And having the latter raise a child is on average going to produce more pathological liars and cheaters.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Insulting someone is a full-fledged speech act. It requires nothing from the subject. Insults come unpacked upon delivery. That said, it's a word only a gAlt-Right twat would use.
Innit, Bob?

If said word is "cuck", then no, I would not claim it's a word the alt-right "twats" would exclusively use.

Amusing perspective, though. Most of the IRL cuckolds I have been made aware of, swing liberal.
The "altright" (or whatever on YT) seems to like to use the word. But yes, I've noticed it being mostly the SJW type person that is into whoring around, or as they like to call it "polyarmory". Heck, there was some article that claimed that cuckoldry is a positive thing for a relationship. I guess they've never heard of communication, or at least toys. I expect a lot of midlife crisis and late-life depression as they look back on their lives a few decades from now. The easy way out never goes well after all.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
It is a little mind boggling that anyone would sell during the weekend knowing they could sell for 10-20% more on Monday. Can a bear explain the mentality?

I'm not a bear but I will try to explain following a simple strategy that helps me sleep at night:
I sell 50% of my earnings daily, regardless of price.

 Invest -> Profit -> Protect



My strategy that helps me sleep at night is to convert all my daily earnings to bitcoin, regardless of price.
copper member
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
And that's why they should be taken away from the mother. Her lack of responsibility will cause long lasting damage to her children as opposed to short lived grief. It's not like they can't see her whatsoever, and it's certainly not like they can't go live with her once they're of legal age. So there's no reason to risk further damage by having an irresponsible twat raise those kids. And since we're on a Bitcoin forum here, I'm sure we all know where the dice fall in terms of short versus long.

And as far as child support goes. No. Not everyone else comes second. He did not father the boys so he should not be forced to pay for them. That's called theft. No matter how hard you try to reason it away.

Sure, giant foster homes...that has worked good in the past and other countries today (not) ... see how well that worked in the 20's and 30's ... taking kids away from unwed mothers

hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
Family is what matters. I am the most important part of my family, and everyone is almost as important. Those brats fathered by someone else? Not family. The cheating whore who lied to me and tricked me into spending money and effort raising some bastard spawn? Negative fucking family. She deserves to suffer, and the other kids deserve their real father.

If you don't take care of yourself first (nobody else will) then you will not be of much use to the others for long.  Self first IS the long view.  Take responsibility for your own actions.  Set an example.
Would merit, but ran out. So QFT instead.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
It is a little mind boggling that anyone would sell during the weekend knowing they could sell for 10-20% more on Monday. Can a bear explain the mentality?

I'm not a bear but I will try to explain following a simple strategy that helps me sleep at night:
I sell 50% of my earnings daily, regardless of price.

 Invest -> Profit -> Protect



Phhhht.

That's no way to gamble!
grn
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 252
It is a little mind boggling that anyone would sell during the weekend knowing they could sell for 10-20% more on Monday. Can a bear explain the mentality?

I'm not a bear but I will try to explain following a simple strategy that helps me sleep at night:
I sell 50% of my earnings daily, regardless of price.

 Invest -> Profit -> Protect

legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - note, MY kids, not some other mans kids - then the mother of my kids. Then everyone else.

There is a hierarchy, and some cheating whore is not in it.

Individualism only until your collectivism kicks in, right at your front door. You are a moral tribalist at heart.

If you don't take care of yourself first (nobody else will) then you will not be of much use to the others for long.  Self first IS the long view.  Take responsibility for your own actions.  Set an example.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - note, MY kids, not some other mans kids - then the mother of my kids. Then everyone else.

There is a hierarchy, and some cheating whore is not in it.

Individualism only until your collectivism kicks in, right at your front door. You are a moral tribalist at heart.
Family is what matters. I am the most important part of my family, and everyone is almost as important. Those brats fathered by someone else? Not family. The cheating whore who lied to me and tricked me into spending money and effort raising some bastard spawn? Negative fucking family. She deserves to suffer, and the other kids deserve their real father.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - note, MY kids, not some other mans kids - then the mother of my kids. Then everyone else.

There is a hierarchy, and some cheating whore is not in it.

Individualism only until your collectivism kicks in, right at your front door. You are a moral tribalist at heart.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
You bunch of off-topic cucks. Get back to work! Angry

Work is slavery, man!  Haven't you heard?
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
And that's why they should be taken away from the mother. Her lack of responsibility will cause long lasting damage to her children as opposed to short lived grief. It's not like they can't see her whatsoever, and it's certainly not like they can't go live with her once they're of legal age. So there's no reason to risk further damage by having an irresponsible twat raise those kids. And since we're on a Bitcoin forum here, I'm sure we all know where the dice fall in terms of short versus long.

And as far as child support goes. No. Not everyone else comes second. He did not father the boys so he should not be forced to pay for them. That's called theft. No matter how hard you try to reason it away.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278

Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - note, MY kids, not some other mans kids - then the mother of my kids. Then everyone else.

There is a hierarchy, and some cheating whore is not in it.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
You bunch of off-topic cucks. Get back to work! Angry
Jump to: