Once upon a time people insisted that it was inconceivable for Bitcoin to go below a previous ATH. It did that with ease in 2014. Then people identified some 234 day cycle and predicted an ATH in July 2015. Nope.
Anyone declaring anything based on Bitcoin history will be shown to be a silly sausage.
Very true. We can be excited for what appears like more adoption and a subsequent price increase. But what we don't ever know is if the current price truly reflects a public buying demand or not. In 2013, it did not. Which is only something that you can see in hindsight, after a downturn and a subsequent bear market begins.
What I do know is that as the Bitcoin market cap gets bigger and bigger, it takes much more money to move the market, even with some leverage available. In the past with the market being so small and illiquid, there was much incentive by whales with deep pockets and massive 100x leverage to PnD the bitcoin market for a few months and then go short.
Now I think the reverse is true, in that there is more incentive for deep pockets to go long (i.e., as a true long investment) because getting a lot of REAL money back out quickly after a lot of buying in for several years would be difficult. The market is spread over so many exchanges now. The mass public can find avenues to buy in easily and quickly. Shorting is getting more dangerous. Plus, Bitcoin has proved itself to have real staying power as a real deflationary financial instrument, and not just an overnight flash-in-the-pan. The public's perception is changing.
/ignore