Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 15931. (Read 26586243 times)

I agree with you it is already invented but i would say that bitcoin can go to 10k easily at the end of this year don't you agree with me it has already reached 7.5k don't you think it can go even higher than that easily?

Seems like a team effort, anyhow - including a kind of consensus that is achieved.. and does meaning come across through it?  ..

Really, I appreciate the concept of being roached... it has a kind of resonance with me, and it seems to be a kind of common phenomenon in bitcoinlandia.. whether it is distraction by PMs or distractions by alts or just a kind of bearish waiting and betting to buy lower..

I already mentioned that BJA seems to have been roached, too.. and both roach and BJA are famous personas in this thread.. .perhaps, I will think about being BJA-ed as similar to being roached.

My fork coins are worth what my bitcoins were worth last year.

 

LOL, yes, you're right! I was a CCMF newbie, not too long ago...

Ok, maybe take 50/50 credit?

Goes back a little further, actually:

my plessure

We can thank vroom for that one.

I just saw THAT LINE from 300 on youtube. And what I heard was Carolina. God damn you people.

Guys, seriously, I don't know if you've noticed it, but we've coined two new and ultra-cool crypto terms:

Carolina

Being roached out

IMO, they both deserve to be up there with HoDL, Bitcorn, and This Is Gentlemen.

I love it!

People should be given their choice of reimbursement in either fiat or btc. Crime should not be profitable, otherwise we will get more criminals.

You think there are that many people still out for blood?  

That would be crazy if any court (even if in Japan) would allow for that level of disparity and seemingly unjust enrichment of a person (Mark) who, at minimum, was very negligent and more likely reckless with carrying out his custodial duties over the coins of others.

Given the considerable and even exponential increase in value of BTC during this calendar year, including issuance of BCH and BTC coins and S2x futures, as you mentioned LP, it would be really nice if the court could figure out a kind of prompt resolution to allow for a 50% reimbursement, or something like that, of everyone who had BTC balances at the time of the GOX closure, even if the rest of the proceedings might be held up or held off in order to possibly consider other distribution matters.  The exponential price appreciation of BTC brings a kind of special circumstance that should allow for some quick handing out of justice to help to ameliorate some of the suffering of those folks holding (or claiming) BTC values at that time of the Gox closure... of course, there will still be some screwiness in the distribution, perhaps, because some folks were in the middle of trades, when the surprise shutting off of the site happened..

These are unusual times in BTC that would allow for unusual measures and a kind of prompt partial justice, yet sometimes courts don't seem to be practical in terms of flexible thinking to treat an asset class that they likely do not understand too well and in terms of applying old standards to new asset dynamics.  

Anyhow issuing 50% BTC to all outstanding BTC claims, would likely allow for the reimburse everyone of those particular
BTC holding folks well more than 100% (if such a concept is possibly understood) of the then value of their BTC, and possibly the court would not appreciate that kind of outcome either, since they are probably still considering that some of the outstanding BTC claims are NOT valid, perhaps?    So, if they are having some trouble with some of the claims, then perhaps, just reward 50% of the BTC value to all of the folks that have claims that are not disputed.  By now, you would think that there are likely quite a few of those kinds of undisputed claims, no?

I can think of worse problems to have than 180K BTC.

BTC.top stopped signalling segwit2x an hour ago.

still 942 btc1 nodes alive on the network.

Wouldn't be surprised if he ends up forked into a dead-end chain.  I believe several people are, and will still be, miffed, no matter the legal outcome.  All of them gamblers, most of them now flush with pseudonymous wealth. 

I only have about 7% of my clone coins remaining - although I have a few more coins that would have been about an additional 1% or perhaps 2% of my stash that are pending issuance from the fuck head coinbase's seemingly scandalous decision to wait until January 1, 2018 to actually issue the coins to their users..   Probably I would have cashed out some of those by now, if I had had access to them.   

I do have a few additional BCH that are kind of tied up in WEX tokens (formerly known as BTC-e) (which WEX tokens are currently trading at about 50% of the value of the actual BCH) - which I consider to be a little bit of a different issue in terms of getting access to BCH.  I generally have not been cashing out of any of my WEX tokens, because WEX has actually said that, at some point (that they have not specified), they are going to 100% for each and every token that they issued, and it has been nearly 2 months since WEX issued tokens, but they have not credited any reimbursement, at all, yet.

Based on the lack of fundamentals of BCH, you would think that this might be the last pump of BCH - however, who really knows for sure.  Coins don't seem to die in cryptolandia - but I suppose if BCH miners begin to dump their coins, then it could be a sign that this is the last pump? 

He looks fabulous now and I actually kind of envy him.

But I am still appalled that the value of BCH+BTG (future)+S2X (future) alone already cover HALF of creditor's claim (in fiat terms).  So technically he could just give creditors those forkcoins, but still keep 90% of BTC and made off like a bandit.  I wouldn't want to be him if he end up with like 180K BTC in the end.

And 110€ difference between Kraken and Stamp... .

kraken USD price: 7230
Euro price: 6040 =7030$. Some traders are completely illiterate!