tonnes of scope for Ver to scam people for the wrong bitcoin
There isn't a right bitcoin because nobody ever solved the problems of decentralization or scaling. Not to mention decentralization is a problem that's not possible to solve in craptocurrency, rendering the entire exercise pointless and inferior to gold and silver as money which already existed beforehand.
The only way bitcoin could theoretically derive some type of value is from transaction flow and not stock, since it's mostly an imaginary idea/thing in the first place. You can't store value in an imaginary asset. It's value could only come from whatever possible utility it provides. It doesn't have value just from existing (stock)...because it doesn't really even exist. Gold and silver have actual scarcity. Bitcoin is based on artificial scarcity. This makes it similar to fiat from an economics point of view, in that any value over zero is technically a bubble, it's only a question of how long the bubble lasts. But the market will eventually take the value back down to zero again. It could come quick and painful like Venezeulan fiat, or longer and drawn out like USD fiat.
So, without trying to take sides on any dumb tertiary issues that I dont' care about between people like Roger Ver, Maxwell, and the Gavinator, the fact is that bitcoin is not decentralized and never will be decentralized, so whether your blocks are big or small doesn't really matter all too much. From the economics point of view, the bitcoin value should be HIGHLY correlated to scaling (flow) and zero to do with stock because it's a fucking imaginary asset. So if your goal is just to try and increase the value of your pump and dump (let's face it, that's all bitcoin is because without solving the problem of decentralization, it has zero fundamentals and it's not possible to solve), then you would want to raise scaling at all costs in an attempt to inflate the pump and dump before it inevitably impoldes and people park their money in non-imaginary assets instead.