Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 15940. (Read 26586174 times)

What's going on?

Anything happend?

If Bitcoin is not worth $500,000 in 3 years. Right now in my opinion, he is winning.

Does this mean eventually that McAffe will do on TV what he said he'd do on TV  ?   

Thank you for reaching out the Bitcoin Inc HQ. We are sorry for your loss. To compensate for this, we will credit your original Bitcoins with 20% more value in coming days. Hope this addresses your concern. We value your relationship with Bitcoin and hope to see you again. Thanks for giving us the opportunity to serve you.

price is too cheap 

$10k by 2018?

WTF no 20% airdrop?? This game sux

ditto...still trying to get my head around this complete jump from insanity...to sanity...it is an ASIC MIRACLE...... (we should put up a shrine to this)

hope it is 'catching'

who'd a thunk it? not me ...I thought they might augur the whole works into the ground...

right on

the amount of crap thrown at bitcoin over the last 12 months is phenomenal

yet the next week price goes boom again

luvin it


side note: if they have no answer, purposely refuse not to see their point of view, if then they become abusive or violent - you found a piece in the puzzle to all thats #happening at #aliceinwonderland just follow the #breadcrumbs +++

Hilarious.

I think that was the BCH Launch 

Are we ready for takeoff??

Everyone is onboard the Bitcoin plane! The pilot taxis to the very end of the runway, turns the plan around on a dime, adjusts his sunglasses and throttles up the engines.

It's a heavy load, the tanks are full of fuel - the cargo bay is full of champagne, gold bars and lambos - we will need every inch of the runway. Fasten your seat belts - we are going up goddammit!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs

rogue miners can still run the software, it could still happen

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/928308564208373761

Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?

I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace...   Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators.

O.k.. thou dost protest too muchie.

How could I be disingenuous when I am not even talking substantively about the argument between you and paashaas, whether he actually merits the "fuckface" descriptor or not, and I was just having a little fun with you in regards to your choice of fuckface rather than some other kind of potentially better discriptor.  You disgruntled fat picnic food eating bear, you.

Have a little fun!!!!  I understand that your grumpy ass bear is likely feeling worse because your potentially newly spouted attack vector (namely segwit2x) has seemingly been put on a kind of tentative HODL status.. and even cancelled completely - yet I doubt that either you or your other nutjobber BIG blockers are going to give up on your whining about core, blah blah blah.. but I do recognize that it probably has not been a good day for you hoo.  So, to the extent that there is any genuiness in your BIG blocker nutjob position, which I highly doubt, I would therefore hypothetically have some sympathy to the extent that possibly, maybe and perhaps there could on the out chance be some actual kind of semblance of genuineness there.... so DONT   be using my "genuiness" word against me, especially when it doesn't even seem to apply to this particular situation.

mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared

nice wee ascending triangle there

lol

Call off the party.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/2017-November/000689.html

Even though I have him on ignore I can still kind of hear the chatter from a distance.