Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1640. (Read 26714364 times)
September 30, 2023, 03:07:19 PM
September 30, 2023, 03:03:24 PM
September 30, 2023, 02:42:35 PM
Too much, buddy 
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot.
I was thinking more in the 10-25 Dollar range.
EDIT: 1% would be too much imo. 0,1% fits the purpose of getting rid of those flatline-charts in series, which my suggestion mainly was about.
Personally, i don't care about the price reminder if it is less than 1% change, but $100 as a "limit" is fine too (at these prices).
imho, $15-25 is too "granular" for being of much use.
I think even $100 isn't a good range as that can happen many times and the Buddy will somehow spam if that price range takes place many times during the pumps or dumps. I believe that $200 to $250 would be a better range for Buddy to show us the charts so we can get a better picture of what's happening in the market, and Philpma1957 will also be in peace because he'll remain as the top poster if the main competitor buddy gets limited.
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot. EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
If it's not broke, don't fix it.
Let's break it ourselves and then fix it. I think it needs the fix and it might be broke but we aren't aware of it. Let's do it for the betterment of the thread and for the happiness of the users who want that.
September 30, 2023, 02:34:18 PM
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot.
I was thinking more in the 10-25 Dollar range.
EDIT: 1% would be too much imo. 0,1% fits the purpose of getting rid of those flatline-charts in series, which my suggestion mainly was about.
Personally, i don't care about the price reminder if it is less than 1% change, but $100 as a "limit" is fine too (at these prices).
imho, $15-25 is too "granular" for being of much use.
September 30, 2023, 02:03:23 PM
September 30, 2023, 02:00:13 PM
Lmfao these retarded Bljatcoiners in our Country paid several K € just to make an AD about bljatcoin and craptocoins. Saying just buy 1k just 1k almost saying PLEASE 😂😂It is the sign that all of it is failing. Thank god very few are so retarded to buy.
We actualy know what true and safe investment is as we our people learned about this shit years before Bljatcoins went live as similar trash caused big financial problems in the country.
We actualy know what true and safe investment is as we our people learned about this shit years before Bljatcoins went live as similar trash caused big financial problems in the country.
Well, at least out of all of us in these here parts, you are going to be the "safe" one.
At the same time, I am sorry to hear that you are suffering so much through your witnessing of ongoing WO member carnage.
September 30, 2023, 01:53:55 PM
The great battle for $27K is upon us. I think while looking at charts of the previous 4-years is reason to be excited now, one can’t ignore that there is typically one more big drop before the rocket launches. Do folks think that is in store for us again here? Could the new Antminer be the catalyst as Bitmain starts stacking BTC from orders?
September 30, 2023, 01:40:14 PM
These are the things I like, when we see that September is already over and we want to start a good October:
And the volumes that are registered are very good, can you imagine that this Sunday we can register a value of BITCOIN IN $30 thousand Dollars?
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-price-best-september-since-2016
I like that the outlook can feel like that, because that emphasizes that the price of bitcoin will rise or it will very likely be achieved.
On the other hand I see that swiempree Bloomberg gets his dose of Fud:
Source:https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-ending-september-first-quarterly-144059568.html
With all this I am left with the positive, I see a good rise in BTC as more feasible.
And the volumes that are registered are very good, can you imagine that this Sunday we can register a value of BITCOIN IN $30 thousand Dollars?
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-price-best-september-since-2016
I like that the outlook can feel like that, because that emphasizes that the price of bitcoin will rise or it will very likely be achieved.
On the other hand I see that swiempree Bloomberg gets his dose of Fud:
Quote
As September comes to a close, Bitcoin is poised to end the quarter on a down note in its first quarterly decline this yea
Source:https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-ending-september-first-quarterly-144059568.html
With all this I am left with the positive, I see a good rise in BTC as more feasible.
September 30, 2023, 01:39:48 PM
Thanks for this. So, it does look like he's no longer officially linked to nChain. Good riddance!
He's never fired
He only resigns himself
Craig is never sacked
Can you sack a sack?
Or make the sack break his neck?
Either way, it's fine.
September 30, 2023, 01:33:42 PM
Thanks for this. So, it does look like he's no longer officially linked to nChain. Good riddance!
He's never fired
He only resigns himself
Craig is never sacked
September 30, 2023, 01:29:24 PM
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot.
I was thinking more in the 10-25 Dollar range.
EDIT: 1% would be too much imo. 0,1% fits the purpose of getting rid of those flatline-charts in series, which my suggestion mainly was about.
September 30, 2023, 01:22:52 PM
September 30, 2023, 01:15:59 PM
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
The buddy posts a chart on hourly basis and if none of us make a post then we'll see buddy only. I also believe that limiting buddy is somewhat good for the WO thread. I believe buddy should post charts when price pumps a lot or dips a lot and other than that it would make 1 post in 4 hours if the price doesn't change a lot. EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
If it's not broke, don't fix it.
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Code:
import ccxt
import time
# Initialize the exchange
exchange = ccxt.binance() # You can replace 'binance' with your preferred exchange
# Function to get current Bitcoin price
def get_bitcoin_price():
ticker = exchange.fetch_ticker('BTC/USDT')
return ticker['last']
# Function to make a post
def make_post(price_change):
# Replace this with your actual post logic
print(f"Bitcoin price changed by {price_change}%")
# Main loop
while True:
try:
# Get the current price
current_price = get_bitcoin_price()
# Check if there was a 1% change from the last post
if 'last_price' in locals() and abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price > 0.01:
make_post(abs(current_price - last_price) / last_price * 100)
# Update last_price
last_price = current_price
except Exception as e:
print(f"An error occurred: {e}")
# Wait for 60 minutes
time.sleep(60 * 60)
Wow!!!! That's not bad. I might have to retract my above "not broken don't fix" statement... but why? So that I am not called a wiffle-waffler?
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Post a buddychart only if price moves more than 1% either direction since last post. Else wait another 60 minutes and check again.EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
[code snipped]
This would also make @philipma1957 happy.
buddy getting handicap
buddy going woke?
this cannot be so
and that carbon based life form
phil sure is pushy
#haiku
That's a good point. Maybe I should go back to my earlier stance about buddy not being broke?
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Yes, I am seconding this.. but measure in %%, not $$: for example, at least 1% in an hour ($267 currently). EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Any smaller number is wholly irrelevant, imho.
Seems like I read that before.
I must ask my lil selfie: "Lil selfie, am I going through deja vu?"
I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
I'd recommend omitting the silly price numbers completely and just posting the charts. Chart Buddy is not about the price. It's all about the order book and walls at Bitstamp (originally MtGox).Not going to lie.
Mind blown.
September 30, 2023, 01:01:19 PM
September 30, 2023, 12:32:10 PM
Lmfao these retarded Bljatcoiners in our Country paid several K € just to make an AD about bljatcoin and craptocoins. Saying just buy 1k just 1k almost saying PLEASE 😂😂It is the sign that all of it is failing. Thank god very few are so retarded to buy.
We actualy know what true and safe investment is as we our people learned about this shit years before Bljatcoins went live as similar trash caused big financial problems in the country.
We actualy know what true and safe investment is as we our people learned about this shit years before Bljatcoins went live as similar trash caused big financial problems in the country.
September 30, 2023, 12:29:49 PM
large/small unit paradoxes:
currently btc is considered to be too big and sats are too small:
$100 is currently 0.0037 btc, but 370370 sats, both numbers being kind of awkward, psychologically.
I am not trying to argue for microbitcoin or bits, not at all.
However, IF we will proceed to higher numbers, sats will look more attractive than measuring in btc:
at $270K/btc, $100 would be 0.00037 btc (people will make error inputting zeroes, imho) and 37037 sats (or 370.37 sats/$, getting close to the yen value).
at $2.7mil/btc, $100 would be 0.000037btc (even more mistakes and "fat" fingers) and 3700.37 sats (or 37 sats/$, which is on the money for using these units for regular payments).
TL;DR Sometime soon, we would need to promote sats more heavily as a preferred term of unit measurement.
currently btc is considered to be too big and sats are too small:
$100 is currently 0.0037 btc, but 370370 sats, both numbers being kind of awkward, psychologically.
I am not trying to argue for microbitcoin or bits, not at all.
However, IF we will proceed to higher numbers, sats will look more attractive than measuring in btc:
at $270K/btc, $100 would be 0.00037 btc (people will make error inputting zeroes, imho) and 37037 sats (or 370.37 sats/$, getting close to the yen value).
at $2.7mil/btc, $100 would be 0.000037btc (even more mistakes and "fat" fingers) and 3700.37 sats (or 37 sats/$, which is on the money for using these units for regular payments).
TL;DR Sometime soon, we would need to promote sats more heavily as a preferred term of unit measurement.
September 30, 2023, 12:03:24 PM
September 30, 2023, 11:10:15 AM
I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
I'd recommend omitting the silly price numbers completely and just posting the charts. Chart Buddy is not about the price. It's all about the order book and walls at Bitstamp (originally MtGox).
September 30, 2023, 11:01:16 AM
September 30, 2023, 10:56:12 AM
Too much, buddy
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
EDIT: I'd recommend to change Buddy's policy to post a price update only if it moved by a certain amount of dollars.
Yes, I am seconding this.. but measure in %%, not $$: for example, at least 1% in an hour ($267 currently).
Any smaller number is wholly irrelevant, imho.
EDIT sorry, I did not check the @fillippone post made 20 min earlier
Jump to: