Waaay off topic, but still replying
Well, no. Nazis are Nazis. Any attempt to equate someone else to Nazis just deludes what Nazis did.
Are you saying that a Nazi ally is not Nazi?
"Russians, the strongest allies of Nazi Germany...Finland asked Germans for help, which they provided and attacked Russia", wait what
so you're saying that Germans attacked their strongest ally just because Finns asked for it? I'm not even going to touch this one but you seemed to be all kinds of confused.
You're confusing yourself. Where in that sentence do you see me saying that this was the only reason for the attack?
Just being an ally doesn't automatically make you a Nazi, otherwise Japan would be Nazi? Of course there are also Nazi collaborators who directly participated in all of the atrocities and genocide, thats where the lines get blurred and then there are Nazi sympathizer aka Neonazis
You throw out a ridiculous claim (mind you totally unprovoked, there was no mention of Finland at all), and then backtrack with well i never said it was the only reason, technically you never claimed that it was the main reason either...i'm sure it's somewhere there on a spectrum? Yep totally clear, unbiased, objective, truthful position and not an attempt to misleading the weak minds at all.
Well, no. Nazis are Nazis. Any attempt to equate someone else to Nazis just deludes what Nazis did.
Right, that's why the correct term "Neonazis" emerged, for Nazi revivalists.
But i would say that "Nazi" is valid as a term for describing descendants and people that kept the ideology (primarily that ideology of a "master race") alive.
While Russia is throwing around the "Nazi" sticker, while they behave almost exactly like the Nazis did. Look at Poland's WW2 history. Russia also keeps saying that the "West" is weak, which implies the Russians are "strong", thus superior to western people, which reflects the concept of a "master race".
Don't make me bring in the war crimes... To say the least.
If i had to choose between "dictatorship" of either the "West" or "East", i would choose the "West" without a split second to think about.
"Russians, the strongest allies of Nazi Germany...Finland asked Germans for help, which they provided and attacked Russia", wait what
so you're saying that Germans attacked their strongest ally just because Finns asked for it? I'm not even going to touch this one but you seemed to be all kinds of confused.
Name your source, if you want it to be taken serious.
There's a clear line between talking about committing a crime (be it for a shock effect, rebellion stage etc...), and actually committing a crime. Like there are idiots dressing up and worshiping satan by killing some chickens, getting 666 tattoos or whatnot, but that's all mainly for show and attention. So if you weren't actual part of that machine, you're just a Nazi "wannabe", revivalists, sympathizer, Neonazi etc. Not to say that Neonazis and the holders of their ideology are not dangerous, but nevertheless i believe in most instances the distinction is warranted.
"While Russia is throwing around the "Nazi" sticker, while they behave almost exactly like the Nazis did. Look at Poland's WW2 history. Russia also keeps saying that the "West" is weak, which implies the Russians are "strong", thus superior to western people, which reflects the concept of a "master race"."And that's where I loose you, I'm sorry but that's a truly a moronic statement. It totally ignores the fundamental intent and scale. You have to consume a lot of propaganda and perhaps need a lobotomy to believe that saying that "someone is weak" means you believing that everyone else is genetically inferior to your master race and thus must be systematically eliminated. To follow that to its logical conclusion, we either need to delude what Nazis did, and convince everyone that Hitler wasn't that bad and was thinking that other nations just had weaker moral values, or to convince everyone that Russian ideology consists of murdering millions solely based on their race, trying to find the final solution to the western question
by building factories to systematically exterminate westerners as well as use eugenics and conducting medical experiments on the western nationals? Both of which would require large consumption of illegal substance to even consider. Ultimately what you're attempting to pull here is a slippery slope fallacy, Russians did bad, Hitler also did bad, thus Russia=Nazi.
Go ahead and bring up alleged current war crimes but then you'll have to show how they're "almost exactly" like Nazi war crimes. Just don't expect to be taken seriously, if your scale of comparison for "almost exactly" is off by a factor of 10.000x.
If i had to choose between "dictatorship" of either the "West" or "East", i would choose the "West" without a split second to think about.Well that's rather rhetorical, but here's more interesting question meant to underline your idiotic claim of "almost exactly like the Nazis did". What would you choose between "Third Reich" and current "Putin's Russia", this is also rhetorical for most population unless of course you consider yourself to be pure aryan whatever the fuck that might be.
As far as the source, if you read more carefully you'll notice that i was just quoting coolcoinz ridiculous claim, so you have to ask him to name his sources and decide if you want to take him seriously.
...2 months later Russians, the strongest allies of Nazi Germany, attacked Finland and forced it to give away a part of their country.
Finland asked Germans for help, which they provided and attacked Russia....
