Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16852. (Read 26712695 times)

newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?
Yes it does.  It would help us secure bitcoin's greatest use case

This is false.  Bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer because far better alternatives for settlement existed before it's creation (noble metals).  For bitcoin to have value as a settlement layer it would need to be able to compete as the base of Exter's pyramid, but it can't for numerous reasons I've stated before:

1)  Bitcoin has built in middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk, negative traits that are typically found among "currencies" and never found among "money".  The entire purpose of the base of Exter's pyramid is to remove counter party risk so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.  This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.  Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.

2)  Money is an abstract concept that represents goods or the ability to do work (services).  This means the ideal form of money would be energy based since it represents both a commodity and service at the same time.  The problem there is that humans don't have the technology to do so and remove counter party risk, and the free market time after time has signaled removing counter party risk is even more important, so it utilized metals.  The fact that anything you do in bitcoin is going to make you a 1 of N participant means there is no removing counter party risk in bitcoin and it's dead on arrival for competing as a settlement system, aka money, aka the base of Exter's pyramid.

3)  All forms of money and currency have elements of a pyramid or ponzi scheme to them, meaning it's all about me finding some resource and hoarding a bunch of it to try and create a master/slave relationship where I now rule over you because I got what you need.  Such a paradigm doesn't actually work with a "virtual" commodity.  If Elwar or Jimbo corners the entire 21 millioin coin market, it really doesn't mean shit to me.  Under no circumstance do I need their coins when they have no intrinsic real world use, so I can completely ignore them and thus no master/slave relationship is formed.  This is also a good reason why gold may lose a lot of it's market cap to silver in the long run due to gold having far less use.

Well one could argue that bitcoins value is derived from the work (labor) needed to bring each new bitcoin to market.  This would be the work performed by the miners and as anybody who has any history with bitcoin and specifically the act of mining would tell you is that at this stage mining is not about the hardware but about the energy required. And the price of that energy. So bitcoin is energy based representing both a commodity and a service, therefore fitting your description of the ideal form of money.
legendary
Activity: 1844
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

You are, of course, welcome to your opinion, but I fail to see, unless you are going to sleep on top of your pallet of silver with an AK47 while it crosses the Pacific ocean, how physical delivery does not have counter party risk.

Don't get me wrong, huge physs fan here, if it weren't for that dammed boating accident we could get together and try and out macho each other curling our stacks, but yeah, I guess I am a lunatic...I think teleporting the equivalent value of that pallet in an hour or so, securely, does in fact have value.


You do realize that you are talking to a wall? And subsequently we all are observing you talking to that wall......

Now I understand why the gold man wants to spread his disease doubt here.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
[
This is false.  Bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer because far better alternatives for settlement existed before it's creation (noble metals).  For bitcoin to have value as a settlement layer it would need to be able to compete as the base of Exter's pyramid, but it can't for numerous reasons I've stated before:

1)  Bitcoin has built in middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk, negative traits that are typically found among "currencies" and never found among "money".  The entire purpose of the base of Exter's pyramid is to remove counter party risk so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.  This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.  Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.

2)  Money is an abstract concept that represents goods or the ability to do work (services).  This means the ideal form of money would be energy based since it represents both a commodity and service at the same time.  The problem there is that humans don't have the technology to do so and remove counter party risk, and the free market time after time has signaled removing counter party risk is even more important, so it utilized metals.  The fact that anything you do in bitcoin is going to make you a 1 of N participant means there is no removing counter party risk in bitcoin and it's dead on arrival for competing as a settlement system, aka money, aka the base of Exter's pyramid.

3)  All forms of money and currency have elements of a pyramid or ponzi scheme to them, meaning it's all about me finding some resource and hoarding a bunch of it to try and create a master/slave relationship where I now rule over you because I got what you need.  Such a paradigm doesn't actually work with a "virtual" commodity.  If Elwar or Jimbo corners the entire 21 millioin coin market, it really doesn't mean shit to me.  Under no circumstance do I need their coins when they have no intrinsic real world use, so I can completely ignore them and thus no master/slave relationship is formed.  This is also a good reason why gold may lose a lot of it's market cap to silver in the long run due to gold having far less use.

You are, of course, welcome to your opinion, but I fail to see, unless you are going to sleep on top of your pallet of silver with an AK47 while it crosses the Pacific ocean, how physical delivery does not have counter party risk.

Don't get me wrong, huge physs fan here, if it weren't for that dammed boating accident we could get together and try and out macho each other curling our stacks, but yeah, I guess I am a lunatic...I think teleporting the equivalent value of that pallet in an hour or so, securely, does in fact have value.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?
Yes it does.  It would help us secure bitcoin's greatest use case

This is false.  Bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer because far better alternatives for settlement existed before it's creation (noble metals).  For bitcoin to have value as a settlement layer it would need to be able to compete as the base of Exter's pyramid, but it can't for numerous reasons I've stated before:

1)  Bitcoin has built in middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk, negative traits that are typically found among "currencies" and never found among "money".  The entire purpose of the base of Exter's pyramid is to remove counter party risk so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.  This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.  Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.

2)  Money is an abstract concept that represents goods or the ability to do work (services).  This means the ideal form of money would be energy based since it represents both a commodity and service at the same time.  The problem there is that humans don't have the technology to do so and remove counter party risk, and the free market time after time has signaled removing counter party risk is even more important, so it utilized metals.  The fact that anything you do in bitcoin is going to make you a 1 of N participant means there is no removing counter party risk in bitcoin and it's dead on arrival for competing as a settlement system, aka money, aka the base of Exter's pyramid.

3)  All forms of money and currency have elements of a pyramid or ponzi scheme to them, meaning it's all about me finding some resource and hoarding a bunch of it to try and create a master/slave relationship where I now rule over you because I got what you need.  Such a paradigm doesn't actually work with a "virtual" commodity.  If Elwar or Jimbo corners the entire 21 millioin coin market, it really doesn't mean shit to me.  Under no circumstance do I need their coins when they have no intrinsic real world use, so I can completely ignore them and thus no master/slave relationship is formed.  This is also a good reason why gold may lose a lot of it's market cap to silver in the long run due to gold having far less use.
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
Posted March 13th

Scariest shit I read all day.... to think we just ended up here is naive.

https://twitter.com/bergealex4/status/841240903503114241


Cool story bro! Cheesy Cheesy .. I had a laugh! Tongue .. thx! Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Either way is very profitable. If price of fork is higher than we expect we shall get more of Jihan's and Ver's money when we sell it. if price of bitcoin is lower than we expect we can buy more bitcoins.

Or China can go full retard, perform the "anyone can spend" attack by going from legacy bitcoin to segwit, fork back to legacy bitcoin, spend all segwit transactions, and since their BCC chain wouldn't be affected, legacy BTC is now crippled while they pump their BCC coin.
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
time to exit crypto for a while, i see sell off soon

eth selloff already started, next is bitcoin when they sell for fiat

many noobs will be dumped on news as always

just my opinion tho  Smiley


You will be crushed worse than r0achés avatar bug! Cheesy Cheesy

Some of you people here are really clueless.. Smiley   .. I mean, go watch what is happening on the other side of the pond as well. For example food prices are rising, political uncertainty in so many countries, also with all that numerology and nonsense, this is the year when the big crashes are supposed to happen. And don't forget to take into consideration the black swan factor: "the millennials". They will be the biggest betrayers the history of humanity will ever see. They will not fight the wars of anyone, they will not submit to any financial system that is not controlled by them, they will not submit to debt, and they will certainly refuse the land taxation system that is in place for hundreds of years. Everything will crumble into ashes and dust. This is the year of the "fire chicken" in the china calendar thingy, that could be called also the "phoenix". Everything will be burnt down to the ground and something new will rise! Cheesy Cheesy

So stop being delusional. Watch the markets and how the money flows. I haven't seen so many mergers of huge corporations, ever!!! They are preparing for a hard landing, or a crumbling crash!  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1464
Merit: 1136
1500 BTC wall on stamp about to get met.
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 251
This should cheer you all up, some quality Game Theory Analysis of Bitcoin Cash.

https://medium.com/@rextar4444/the-myth-of-bitcoin-cash-understanding-game-theory-f87858bf8791


TLDR: There is no economic viability to bitcoin cash. There is no founded argument for its valuation. The exchanges and companies that support it are insecure and nefarious.

and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?
Yes it does.  It would help us secure bitcoin's greatest use case: https://medium.com/@rextar4444/bitcoins-most-valuable-usecase-7f5c6e95be22

Whereas targeting the block size for some arbitrary optimal or maximum transaction capacity serves no founded argument. 
legendary
Activity: 889
Merit: 1013
This should cheer you all up, some quality Game Theory Analysis of Bitcoin Cash.

https://medium.com/@rextar4444/the-myth-of-bitcoin-cash-understanding-game-theory-f87858bf8791


TLDR: There is no economic viability to bitcoin cash. There is no founded argument for its valuation. The exchanges and companies that support it are insecure and nefarious.

and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?

Great economic viability for the companies that force you to use their second layer technology instead.
legendary
Activity: 1844
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

I will try to keep my negativism to myself.  I wish that things turn out as well as possible for everybody...



Oh the good old days........




legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
This should cheer you all up, some quality Game Theory Analysis of Bitcoin Cash.

https://medium.com/@rextar4444/the-myth-of-bitcoin-cash-understanding-game-theory-f87858bf8791


TLDR: There is no economic viability to bitcoin cash. There is no founded argument for its valuation. The exchanges and companies that support it are insecure and nefarious.

That article does make me feel better, and makes it seem more likely that we are going to be able to thaw out rjclarke more quickly... in a matter of days, rather than months.   Wink Wink
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 601
This should cheer you all up, some quality Game Theory Analysis of Bitcoin Cash.

https://medium.com/@rextar4444/the-myth-of-bitcoin-cash-understanding-game-theory-f87858bf8791


TLDR: There is no economic viability to bitcoin cash. There is no founded argument for its valuation. The exchanges and companies that support it are insecure and nefarious.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
This is really not good in my opinion. All this arguing and shouting amongst us bitcoiners is basically horseshit.  

Uncertainty always drops the price. Are we looking at btc going to 1300 (half of what it is now?) due to 2 bitcoins???Will this set us back a year or more?

I'm still bullish for the long long term future but short/ medium term who knows. Everything I am reading is pissing me off. I will be honest and I still don't fully get the whole BCC BTC thing and what the hell I'll own next month.

My plan is to be cryogenically frozen on Monday evening. Can someone trustworthy like maybe Jimbo, JJG, LFC or Infofront defrost me once this shitstorm passes?
In fact just point the hairdryer at me for a couple of hours when we pass 10k. I may be chilly for some time I think.

Much appreciated.



I wished that I were able to just take my eyes off of this too, and I am partly unsettled about this whole thing because I am not really happy with where my coins are stored, currently (not counting the ones that I recently lost on BTC-e), but I think that I am going to just live with each of the locations of where I put them, and not make any additional coin moves until after the coast is clear - perhaps Wednesday or a week after Wednesday? 

The truth of the matter, rjclarke, it is not likely that I am going to feel comfortable unfreezing you with a blowdryer or throwing hot water at you - until December or so, so you need to find someone who can follow your directive and not interpret any discretion into thawing out matter. 

The fact is once you are frozen, I might become paralyzed about when to execute thawout code. I am getting a sense that this drama is not really going away any time soon.  We got into bitcoin, and there continues to be drama and increasing levels of drama in this space. 

The drama comes from the disruptive nature of bitcoin itself, it's decentralized and opens source nature and becomes more complicated with those latching onto bitcoin's success, including alt coins such as ethereum and forkers and the extent to which status quo governments and financial institutions are contributing to such drama and instability.  oh my! oh my! 

better case scenario would be if the bigblocker goofballs decided not to implement their intended hardfork, and then I could just execute thaw out order.....  but it is seeming more and more likely that the nutjobs are intending to execute such hardfork, with little regard to whether it is good for bitcoin or not... which is not so likely to result in them to going away with their drama anytime soon, even though many of us would prefer to see them go away and play on their own fork.. which is not gonna happen.

We get rid of them, but we still do not get rid of them because they are not gong to let things go.   Cry Cry
sr. member
Activity: 293
Merit: 250
 Slush Pool has no plans to support Bitcoin Cash
Publikováno: 2017-07-28 07:07:27
Dear Miners,

we want to let you know, that we currently have no plans to support the emerging Bitcoin hard fork called Bitcoin Cash (BCC) scheduled for the August 1st, 12:20 UTC. As for now, we do not see a real demand from miners and the costs of creating and maintaining separate Bitcoin Cash infrastructure would be too high.


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
Free bitcoins is always good.
If I sell the shitcoin right away the chance to buy cheap bitcoins is greater.


Thinking about making an option on FreeBitcoins.com so that people can claim and dump their BCC easily.

We already do that for other altcoins.
legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
"Nobody is imposing Bitcoin Cash on you. To avoid it, you need do nothing."
/Roger Ver

"If you use "Bitcoin" as part of the name of this altcoin, you're imposing it on me. That is why I'll make some bitcoins out of your altcoin."
/becoin
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1016
[...] just point the hairdryer at me for a couple of hours when we pass 10k.

Which coin?

Why would it matter? If he frozen for all that time, he'll still have both coins.

Exactly Mr Bones.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
[...] just point the hairdryer at me for a couple of hours when we pass 10k.

Which coin?

Why would it matter? If he frozen for all that time, he'll still have both coins.

Well I keep on reading by some vocal posters that BCC is a shit coin. So I figured some might not care if actually BCC hit $10k.

"Nobody is imposing Bitcoin Cash on you. To avoid it, you need do nothing."
/Roger Ver



BCC probably is a shit coin, IMHO. However, if they can make their coup succeed, my hat is off to them.
Jump to: