So yeah it all makes sense, might be true, and out of all it's my favorite narrative..
But all your writing in huge letters doesn't change the fact that you don't have any hard evidence for it either (even if "most likely" true)
But all your writing in huge letters doesn't change the fact that you don't have any hard evidence for it either (even if "most likely" true)
The corrupt financial entities and whales don't need to provide any evidence, hard or soft, of their cheating or manipulation of the markets. They are not going to provide any.
They just quietly do it on the DL.
Not saying you, but it's the total smooth brain retards that are constantly saying "Hurp durp, show us the hard evidence or it isn't happening/ doesn't happen."
It's the same smooth brain retards that always look for a "reason" behind every large green or red candle move, every rally or every crash. And the corrupt whales are always right there to give them one in the MSM to satisfy them.
"Why is Bitcoin rallying today?"
"Why is Bitcoin crashing today?"
"Oh I see, it happened because blah blah blah....because the news just told me why....blah blah blah..."
I certainly don't need evidence for any logically accessible conclusion. But I find it important in communication to make it clear, when something is an assumption vs a fact that is provable to even brainless people.
The search for a reasons at every green/red candle is actually the dumb gossip I enjoy. Often, somewhere in it lays the truth. However, until there is said provability it's all just interesting (even if highly probable) non-exclusively competing stories.
To paraphrase physicist Heinz von Förster:
There are two kind of questions: the ones with a quick and provable answer, and the ones with many explanations. There exist that many explanations, because these questions are basically not answerable.
