Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 17683. (Read 26714977 times)
March 09, 2017, 06:36:12 PM
I need confirmation. The SEC is playing with my balls and I don't like that.
March 09, 2017, 06:16:40 PM
wasn't a press conference going to take place tomorrow because of the ETF decision?
March 09, 2017, 06:04:56 PM
Bitcoin can possibly be anti-fragile, because its properties can change in order to make it more robust in the face of setbacks.
So basically you're saying mob rule is anti-fragile and that attribute is somehow a positive thing for bitcoin. It isn't money in the first place if it just changes at random because it's obviously not fungible then.
March 09, 2017, 05:59:41 PM
I'm guessing Monday but that's only my opinion and I have nothing to back it up with.
Edit. All this will do will mess with my head all weekend.
Edit. All this will do will mess with my head all weekend.
March 09, 2017, 05:57:20 PM
Alright when is the ETF decision being released
Need to be at the screen tomorrow..
Need to be at the screen tomorrow..
March 09, 2017, 05:51:45 PM
why is the SEC doing this to us
Would you rather have a denial???
Each day with no decision = WIN!
March 09, 2017, 05:43:43 PM
What if it all goes Ka-Ka-Boom?
Isn't instead of this boom they are talking about?
Will there be blood in the streets as someone insinuated before.
Isn't instead of this boom they are talking about?
Will there be blood in the streets as someone insinuated before.
March 09, 2017, 05:33:15 PM
So SEC decision tomorrow or what?
Wow. Tomorrow it is then or is THIS fake news. (Whilst Pointing in the air like mr president does)
No, they haven't studied the small print like us. They don't know about the sneaky rule that allows a delay of the ETF decision until Monday.
I don't know man.Have you seen that interview?
I just got sent the image so I can not say how much they've talked in detail about the ETF.
March 09, 2017, 05:32:26 PM
Gold and Bitcoin both correcting and we are at parity once again at 1200$
March 09, 2017, 05:28:15 PM
This is a real drama. 
March 09, 2017, 05:24:27 PM
Their 8 ball is broken. They need a replacement fast.
March 09, 2017, 05:22:52 PM
I would have expected a leak by now, sheesh. The SEC can't be that good, it is part of the US government!
March 09, 2017, 05:21:26 PM
why is the SEC doing this to us
March 09, 2017, 05:15:46 PM
So SEC decision tomorrow or what?
Wow. Tomorrow it is then or is THIS fake news. (Whilst Pointing in the air like mr president does)
No, they haven't studied the small print like us. They don't know about the sneaky rule that allows a delay of the ETF decision until Monday.
March 09, 2017, 05:12:56 PM
So SEC decision tomorrow or what?
Wow. Tomorrow it is then or is THIS fake news. (Whilst Pointing in the air like mr president does)
March 09, 2017, 05:12:17 PM
When its approved all the unbelievers and bears + kwuckduck will be destroyed and left in pieces for ever. It will be the day that we make history folks !
It's getting plastered all over the mainstream media already. These are the top results of a google for "Bitcoin" today.
If the ETF is approved the mainstream will be shouting about it for weeks afterwards.
March 09, 2017, 05:11:33 PM
So SEC decision tomorrow or what?
its official tomorrow is the big day
March 09, 2017, 05:08:56 PM
So SEC decision tomorrow or what?
March 09, 2017, 05:08:29 PM
SEC is tasked to protect investors, not speculators.
What is the difference?
March 09, 2017, 05:07:06 PM
anti-fragile (colloquial use of the word, FU jbreher).
Haha - you're destroying yet another word. 'Colloquial' implies 'in widespread use'. The only person I've ever seen use 'anti-fragile' in a consistently inverse manner is you.
If you wish to be understood, you'd be better served by employing words in a manner consistent with their definitions.
And we already went over this. "Anti-fragile" is a mostly hypothetical word that doesn't really apply to bitcoin at all, yet the word is constantly used to describe bitcoin, so it must have some type of colloquial definition in this context. You keep trying to claim I invented the use of this word to describe bitcoin when I didn't. Probably some random guy like Antonopolous started it, but I don't remember.
No, I keep pointing out that you are the only one that misapplies this word to gold.
Bitcoin can possibly be anti-fragile, because its properties can change in order to make it more robust in the face of setbacks.
Gold cannot be anti-fragile, because it is unable to change in any manner. It is an element.
Jump to: