I see this as a large bounce off the 750 low, we should hit the 78% retracement at 1055. But, to zoom through the ATH from here, doesnt look proportional...it's happening too quick. If this is indeed the 'handle' part of the huge cup and handle from 2013-now, then another drop is likely.
This is also logical to me. The handle is not formed yet, should take a minimum of 5.2857 weeks up to 6 months. I see the price getting to $1000-$1050 followed by another correction of ~25%, so not as far of a drop percentage wise as before but nonetheless.
Again I am not a bear but a chartist (novice).
I do want the price to go CCMF and to the moon, etc. But wishing for it to happen does not make it happen, being prepared for the swings helps psychologically as well as financially.
As you were typing that post, the price had already been touching upon $1010.. and maybe even a bit beyond.... So, yeah, even while we are experiencing decent upwards pressures, you are suggesting the price could drop at any minute... Yeah, you are right that it can, but when we are in the midst of a run (and even kind of in a momentum production period, there is no reason to believe that the price is going to suddenly reverse - even though it is possible to experience such reversals, the momentum remains ---- uppity... ).. so in that regard, it seems more realistic to prognosticate that there is going to be a bit more uppity.. before the down or flat begins..... am I not correct?
Sidenote:
All these people claiming to be investors still spouting the same thing yet the sooner they realize that they are actually traders then they can worry about price drops. As an investor the current price should never matter since they are hodling long term and any price below their target sell price is a great price to buy. All this bullshit of "Gee I only buy the dips," is pure hogwash. If you are only seeing it as a good buy because it once was $1200 and now it is $1000, then all last year and the year before and the year before that were great buying opportunities. So please save us all the rhetoric and keep the mindless chatter to yourselves.
You are just spouting out wanna be right self righteous baloney here, and seem to be trying to accuse people of being hypocrites merely because they are not going all in at all times. Even you should realize by now that having a really strong belief that the price is going up does not necessarily mean that you gotta go balls to the walls in, otherwise you are hypocrite.. that is baloney. A person could have a strong belief about up and only be 60% in or 80% in or 96% in... and that is going to vary from person to person, and they can practice such variance without being hypocritical.
And, buying on dips is a great strategy.. for a lot of reasons, including the fact that there is frequently a cash flow situation that people have to deal with... maybe when prices were $250 for much of 2015, I only had $2k cash that I could invest, and I choose to invest $1k because even though I think that the price has a good chance of going up, I really do not know. Now, over the next 12 to 18 months, I may continue to have a cash flow that continues to allow me to buy $100 a month... but I did not have that additional $1,200 to $1,800 available in 2015, even though in subsequent months, I can assess my finances and figure out that I do have that money available (to buy on dips)...
Ever heard of dollar cost averaging? Ever heard of dollar cost averaging? Dollar cost averaging only works if the price is going down from the point you bought in the first place, otherwise you are increasing your cost average by buying more as the price rises, yet this isn't the point of my argument only yours.
1) dollar cost averaging works in a lot of situations, and usually folks do better by employing some kind of variation of it - not necessarily by attempting to time the market or attempting to maximize anything (such as low costs)
2) Whether this is your point or not, the point plays in to your attempt to criticize folks merely because they have a variety of approaches and whether they call their approach "investing" or "trading" or whether they are consistent along the way or whether they consistently change their approach does not really matter. People will frequently attempt to figure something that works for them and they may also have to change it many times because not everyone is as smart as you seem to be suggesting that they have to be in order to have a successful approach.
But alas you have your JJG blinders on again and have missed the point?
Yes. You made your points, and I made my points, and hopefully one or both of us become more enlightened by exchanging points. hahaahaha.
Do you even read people's posts or do you form an opinion based on the word length?
Yes.. I responded to various points that you made, and you limited your response without addressing a variety of points that I made. I doubt that we necessarily need to act as is we get all the points of others in order to make our own points or even to substantially respond to points that were raised by the other (whether intentional or not).
So, yeah, even while we are experiencing decent upwards pressures, you are suggesting the price could drop at any minute... Yeah, you are right that it can, but when we are in the midst of a run (and even kind of in a momentum production period, there is no reason to believe that the price is going to suddenly reverse - even though it is possible to experience such reversals, the momentum remains ---- uppity... )
Did I suggest a sudden drop? no
what you want to suggest and what you suggest can be two different things.
I suggested this repeat of chart patterns. Please look at June-July 2016, November-Dec 2015, May-August 2014, November 2013-Feb 2014. Do you not see the same thing over and over and over and over?
Or do you suggest that there has to be some kind of ban or horrible news piece to make the price drop?
Both of us are probably smart enough to know that prices rise and drop for a variety of reasons which can be a combination of factors that you can measure in technical analysis and math, and yes, sometimes it is news and sometimes it is merely a small number of manipulators causing the momentum or the change in momentum.
Like I already mentioned (or at least implied), even if you are relying on technical analysis, you are also assigning a set of probabilities to events - unless you happen to think (which I believe would be foolish) that some results are inevitable rather than 20% or 60 % or 93.54% probable? I doubt that you believe that outcomes are certain, even if sometimes you are phrasing some of your analysis in ways that seem to give way too high of probabilities to some outcomes.
Edit:
..."not going all in at all times"
Also I do not use infinitives like you seem to, it is extreme left or extreme right with you.
Fair enough.. It may have just been my reading, and may have just been that one post? I am not attempting to find any pattern in your predictive behavior.. at least, not yet..
Whatever.... we can call ourselves whatever we want, and yeah, sure our activities may also fit in one category or another and we may or may not be calling ourselves correctly... Why does it matter?