Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18442. (Read 26712846 times)

I have no problem conceding that we are at logger heads, and we have been at logger heads for some time.

Accordingly, each of us largely speak in conclusions in respect to the facts upon which we rely. 

I assert that seg wit is a decent developing next step that is in the process of unwinding and is largely non controversial, and I assert that so far there has been inadequate facts, logic or support to push XT/Classic or any of the other blocksize limit raising changes forward, therefore those proposals are largely dead at the moment, even though the arguments could be raised again. 

More or less, you take the opposite position to suggest that the blocksize limit debate is still alive and well (supposedly) and to assert that there is some kind of seg wit controversy (supposedly).

Whenever new facts develop, each of us picks the facts that support our view and emphasize those facts, and neither one of us either wants to engage in additional research or to provide additional explanation for our positions, except maybe to the extent that we stumble upon such evidence or logic in our normal course of the day (in other words, we are not going out of the way to research or to respond to one another).  That seems to be a kind of loggerheads.

You said that you want to keep calling my supposed "bullshit", and I could give a ratt's ass that you feel such necessity, except I guess I need to respond to you to the extent that my responses may seem necessary to clarify some matters from time to time, even though it seems to be a repeated dialogue and a kind of waste of time.. maybe for both of us, if i give you some benefit of the doubt that you are actually being genuine in what appears to me to be largely nonsense?