You are just on and on about Ethereum, and it seems that you don't even believe the bullcrap that you are spouting.
Who the fuck knows about short term price directions of ETH? I'm sure they can continue to pump Ethereum for a while, but there is just a lack of fundamentals - at least in respect to the decentralized aspect of it, and at some point it is going to have to come cascading down.
Yeah, they can keep pumping it, but when there is a lack of some of the fundamentals, then sooner or later people are going to recognize the lack of there, there.
Lol @ unironically trotting out fundamentals while invested in beetcoin.
I wonder if I should even respond to your nonsense.....
Yes, it's called fundamentals if you even considered facts beyond mere superficial quibblings around the word itself. Fundamentals for bitcoin includes permissionless immutable decentralization that has been built upon quite extensively, which is a set of fundamentals that no other coin can meaningfully claim. Yes, there are some coins that attempt some forms of decentralization and attempt to make meaningful improvements to bitcoin (such as monero and dash), and many claim decentralization in a kind of in-name only way, such as Ethereum, but many, including Ethereum, still do not have a decentralized proof of work infrastructure that secures a public ledger and presets value in such a manner that has been extensively time tested and attacked (like bitcoin has).
Your inability to call bitcoin by it's proper name, here, also goes to show that you are not even attempting to consider actual technical or use case facts.. because your goals appears to be denigrate, distort and make superficial and self-selective assertions.
Number of non-criminal unique bitcoin use cases that aren't contrived bullshit: ZERO.
What is bullshit, is you. There may be a lot of folks who use bitcoin for legally questionable activities, yet you defy adult logic with your attempt to suggest that merely because there is quite a bit of questionably legal or even illegal activities within bitcoin, that the totality has no legal purpose.
I didn't suggest that it is impossible to use BTC for legal activities, or that no one has ever done it. I said that there are no unique
1 bitcoin use cases that aren't contrived or bullshit.
2It is possible to drive nails with the butt of a broomhandle Mauser, and I'm certain people have done it, but:
1. You don't need to buy a Mauser to drive nails, and the broomhandle one is a particularly bad choice. You can drive nails with a hammer, or a rock.
Therefore, nail-driving is not a *unique use case* for broomhandle Mousers.
2. Please don't say "but what if you're in early 1900s China and you have to defend yourself from rival warlords and fix a lose leg on that little demilune that is held together with nails because Chinese. Because that's contrived bullshit.
Number of non-criminal bitcoin companies that have made money for their investors: ZERO.
I doubt that we have enough information regarding this point,
I got more than enough, thank you.
Number of non-criminal bitcoin companies that went belly up/simply ran away with the money: staggering.
You sound like a fucking old disgruntled and out of touch person-bot.