Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18647. (Read 26686232 times)

legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
btc pump over for time being...watch out for auction
Just a small correction. We'll resume the rally once the sellers are done taking their profits. Plus the real magic of the halving doesn't happen until months from now when people realize it's harder to get coins Grin
spot on m8  Smiley also ltr the blocksize, segwit etc will be in place
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
btc pump over for time being...watch out for auction
Just a small correction. We'll resume the rally once the sellers are done taking their profits. Plus the real magic of the halving doesn't happen until months from now when people realize it's harder to get coins Grin
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Vitalik is not clever at all, he's a naive kid. He's just being exploited by a group of ruthless bankers who get to pump a wunder-kid 'back-story', while painting a $1.5 billion target on Vitalik's head ... and they can disappear when it collapses and Vitalik get's left dealing with the fallout, if he survives that long.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
btc pump over for time being...watch out for auction
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
P.S. Bitcoin is doing x20 worse than ETH. Where's your god now?
http://s31.postimg.org/4x9picsi3/Capture.gif
ETH is worth waaaay less tho so obviously it dosen't have to increase as much in price in order for it to be doing "better" than BTC. I mean I only heard about this ETH today here but how long has it even been around? Don't get me wrong it does look promising but it could just be increasing from the BTC increase could it not? I'm not as clued up as many on here but that's the way it seems to me.

I'm not a macroeconomist. All I'm concerned with is how much more money I make by investing in ETH vs. BTC. Regarding how long it's been around: BTC has been around for a laughably short 7 years, while ETH has been around for 2. On the plus side, ETH isn't struggling to maintain just HALF of its all-time high after spending years in the toilet Smiley
Sounds good, but I love BTC ever since I got into it and unless it collapses I'll stand with BTC I mean just look at the last few days, if I'd hoarded all my BTC like a smart person instead of spending it on shit (drugs) I'd be alot richer than I am right now anyway. And it's the volatility that makes BTC so good to make money with if your patient with your investment and wait for times like these and it will struggle to hold half it's all time value when it rose to such a high price, what's the highest this ETH has been @?
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I think Bitcoin's one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system is far more than enough. The average person isn't going to care about "my money can also be used natively to pay for slow cloud computing services, without having to bother exchanging it first". They just want the most secure banking/payments system, which is Bitcoin.



 Shocked Shocked Shocked


OMG


TERA turning into a real and meaningful bull.



 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Who knows. ETH can just do anything because there is a centralized team of developers led by one king controlling it.

I'm bitter; there's no real reason for me to have missed that train. I just think the DAO is a substantially stupid idea. Am I wrong?
I don't know. I bought a small amount of DAO just because the entire thing was bought out in an IPO at that level and rising, plus it's backed by ETH. Strictly a supply/demand play. And now I'm thinking of selling due to an equally abstract reason - so I don't get in trouble with a court.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[edit]
And again: You can't see the pertinence due to not understanding what I said, and you didn't understand what I said because you're stupid.
Work on not being so stupid, JJG.


Just because I did not respond to your tangent of baloney does not mean that I do not understand your various attempts at stretching logic into incredulity.

You know what, if you were genuinely attempting to engage in material and relevant points and addressing those kinds of more central matters, then maybe it would be acceptable, from time to time, to explore some of your baloney, abstract and minutely relevant puzzles of a point.   Roll Eyes

It does not do a whole hell of a lot of good to talk about various abstractions, when there is plenty of concrete and more relevant points (that you conveniently like to ignore with your broad generalized nonsense).
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
P.S. Bitcoin is doing x20 worse than ETH. Where's your god now?
http://s31.postimg.org/4x9picsi3/Capture.gif
ETH is worth waaaay less tho so obviously it dosen't have to increase as much in price in order for it to be doing "better" than BTC. I mean I only heard about this ETH today here but how long has it even been around? Don't get me wrong it does look promising but it could just be increasing from the BTC increase could it not? I'm not as clued up as many on here but that's the way it seems to me.

I'm not a macroeconomist. All I'm concerned with is how much more money I make by investing in gambling on ETH vs. BTC. Regarding how long it's been around: BTC has been around for a laughably short 7 years, while ETH has been around for 2. On the plus side, ETH isn't struggling to maintain just HALF of its all-time high after spending years in the toilet Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Who knows. ETH can just do anything because there is a centralized team of developers led by one king controlling it.

I'm bitter; there's no real reason for me to have missed that train. I just think the DAO is a substantially stupid idea. Am I wrong?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Well, the entire world economy doesn't need to go Bitcoin. However, if even 1% of the world economy goes Bitcoin, you have an amount equal to a few thousand percent of the current market cap.

You ever consider how much it would cost to secure a "$20 trillion+" POW network? Taking into account that it costs ~25BTC/10 mins to secure it now, when the market cap is a mere 10 billion?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Who knows. ETH can just do anything because there is a centralized team of developers led by one king controlling it.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Isn't ETH supposed to switch to POS at some point? What the hell am I missing here? Huh
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
P.S. Bitcoin is doing x20 worse than ETH. Where's your god now?
http://s31.postimg.org/4x9picsi3/Capture.gif
ETH is worth waaaay less tho so obviously it dosen't have to increase as much in price in order for it to be doing "better" than BTC. I mean I only heard about this ETH today here but how long has it even been around? Don't get me wrong it does look promising but it could just be increasing from the BTC increase could it not? I'm not as clued up as many on here but that's the way it seems to me.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Well, the entire world economy doesn't need to go Bitcoin. However, if even 1% of the world economy goes Bitcoin, you have an amount equal to a few thousand percent of the current market cap.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I think Bitcoin's one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system is far more than enough. The average person isn't going to care about "my money can also be used natively to pay for slow cloud computing services". They just want the most secure banking/payments system, which is Bitcoin.

Banking system doesn't need bitcoin any more than it needs cancer. The banks handle fiat, why in the world would they support something that's openly anti-bank & anti-fiat?
What are you thinking?
The banks don't need to cooperate. I'm talking about when the people choose to use Bitcoin instead of banks so Bitcoin gains some of the market share. I don't when you got here but I've been here for many years since before all these lame 'banking-integration' and 'blockchain' crap started.
Ah, sorry, misinterpreted the "one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system." My mistake.
You feel that world economy is going to go bitcoin? Sounds plausible.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
I think Bitcoin's one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system is far more than enough. The average person isn't going to care about "my money can also be used natively to pay for slow cloud computing services". They just want the most secure banking/payments system, which is Bitcoin.

Banking system doesn't need bitcoin any more than it needs cancer. The banks handle fiat, why in the world would they support something that's openly anti-bank & anti-fiat?
What are you thinking?
The banks don't need to cooperate. I'm talking about when the people choose to use Bitcoin instead of banks so Bitcoin gains some of the market share. I don't when you got here but I've been here for many years since before all these lame 'banking-integration' and 'blockchain' crap started.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I think Bitcoin's one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system is far more than enough. The average person isn't going to care about "my money can also be used natively to pay for slow cloud computing services". They just want the most secure banking/payments system, which is Bitcoin.

Banking system doesn't need bitcoin any more than it needs cancer. The banks handle fiat, why in the world would they support something that's openly anti-bank & anti-fiat?
What are you thinking?
Eh? Because if it becomes as popular as most people here would love it to become, it will destroy their evil fucked up financial system they've created and used to enslave us for decades now and with the damage the banks have done in the past decade especially I hope to see that happen, maybe within the course of a revolution, but hey even better. 
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I think Bitcoin's one use case as a banking system to take over a $20 trillion+ banking system is far more than enough. The average person isn't going to care about "my money can also be used natively to pay for slow cloud computing services". They just want the most secure banking/payments system, which is Bitcoin.

Banking system doesn't need bitcoin any more than it needs cancer. The banks handle fiat, why in the world would they support something that's openly anti-bank & anti-fiat?
What are you thinking?

Re ETH being Turing complete: It's a nice gimmick, even "The DAO" is up 18%, and you need ETH to buy that, so DIY demand -- closest to a closed-loop economy crypto ever got.
Vitalik's a clever guy.
Jump to: