Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18819. (Read 26712694 times)

P2P traffic. It is mostly a poke at your Gnutella chart, as the preferred method of piracy has obviously shifted. If piracy is consuming a smaller percentage of global bandwidth, I'd suggest this is due to streaming services such as Netflix which reduce the incentive, rather than due to anti-P2P endeavours.


Banning ransom payments isn't going to work because enough people will pay to still make it a profitable venture. This is why it isn't good enough, beside the fact that you're criminalizing the victims who do pay, a fact exploitable by the still-not-discouraged hackers.

470$ seems to be too strong again.

Craig Wright's a ginormous block size proponent, he would have written something like the below quote, with the proviso that the blockchain moves to a private network for banks controlled solely by him.

I see what you did there.

Lisk (LSK) $0.368027 (-22.92%)

who is this gal with sexy b00bs

^So French...

I heard noise, right now.

"It can be phased in, like:

if (blocknumber > 115000)
    maxblocksize = largerlimit

It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.

When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade." - Craig Wright

Did you really make legendary with posts like this? I feel sorry for us.

...or can it?

http://s33.postimg.org/clwhta7gv/bitchrs.jpg

humans are corrupt.
bitcoin can not be.

i've heard rumors the coming bubble is fueled by the tears of shortsqueezed bearwhales.

Hahahahahah... with the various recent price movements from $403 to $470 in the last few months and then testing $435 several times, I have been repositioning my BTC/fiat distribution several times, so now seems like BTC prices are gonna have to go below $430 or even lower to put me back in the red (depending on how it plays out exactly).... so yeah, circumstances kind of change over time and we can kind of be active in attempts at leveraging and protecting ourselves, and accordingly, probably characterizing this current BTC price situation as a "brief pause" is going to turn out to be a considerable wrong exaggeration on your part.

In some sense, I will agree with you that it's been quite the BTC bear market, especially from about February 2014 until about August 2015, which was about 17 months worth of kind of bear dominance (not 3 years worth as you seem to be exaggerating that part, too)... but yeah, BTC's apparently obvious post August 2015 price recovery has been quite helpful to me personally as a BTC HODLer and accumulator.

I also cannot forget to thank you for your recognition of my situation and your obvious attempt at a back-handed congratulations, coupled with your seemingly bad prediction concerning BTC's short and/or long term price direction.  

In other words, good luck to you whiny ass bears and corporate (XT/Classic) shills in putting me back in the red.. so this is a relatively happy day for this kitty cat, Meow!!!.  
 

economy ... must serve the people.
economy MUST pay the worker, not the boss.

economy with inalienables rules is Bitcoin.



inalterables rules is the source of trust.
http://www.lafkon.net/tc/

^
Maybe people will just buy a little less child porn, so tx demand would drop and miners will have to drop their fees a little bit? Or do you think bath salts enthusiasts would start buying bath salts more often?

?

That's what happens with a perfectly inelastic supply curve, prices go up, supply stays the same. I mean, I provided you a picture.

If it's any consolation... your level of understanding in the field of economics is on par with the Core developers.

That fee paying spam moves to a Bitcoin substitute, check.