I did not read all of your rewriting of my sentences because it seems like a complete waste of time because it really boils down to a childish form of an ad hominem attack.
Don't you have better things to do with your time?
O.k.. yep, the job of a troller is to attack and to distract with non-sense, and I suppose in that regard you are attempting to earn your money with such efforts?
And, since you are getting paid for these kinds of trolling efforts (hopefully you get paid well, maybe ?? I hope. Is it by the post or by the hour or a salary?
I imagine you are getting paid by the post (in BTC how ironic), maybe .01 or more BTC per post? or some other rate,... I'm kind of guessing the rate. The best paying signature campaigns receive around .0015 per posts, yet the best paying ones explicitly require that posters do not spam or troll, and even the best paying signature campaigns are not going to bring anywhere near enough money to live (maybe .2BTC or so per month). Even if you live in some very cheap place, you need to be able to make 1 BTC per month or so to live, no? I suppose it could be a supplemental income too, even with all your creative efforts?
Since you are getting paid for your distracting efforts, then I suppose, there is some kind of value. In this regard, you get paid and your employer gets some of the value of your efforts as part of the troll/shill team. I hope that you are making at least a couple of BTC per month for your attempts (before you get banned).
So trying to get you to post like a human being is not merely an exerciser in futility, it also makes me a paid shill?
I suppose i shouldn't mention all
the
fucking
blank lines either. Might turn me into a witch, so I won't.
You are a newbie, and amongst some of the evidence of you being a troll or paid shill: 1) you coming into the conversation as if you know everyone (and I don't give a shit about your supposed cover story that you have been reading the forum for years, blah blah blah), < snip >
I don't know. You seem to be attempting to attempt to attribute a claim to me that I am not attempting to make, and/or have attempted to make in the past or am in the process of currently making. Had i have attempted to make such claim, which you are attempting to attribute to me, to wit that we will need greater transaction capacity in the foreseeable future, which as stated previously, I have not attempted to make, nor am likely to make in the foreseeable future, my line of argument would be quite unlike the one to be pursued below, i.e the one i find fitting to pursue in light of your nasty and manipulative misinterpretation of my intended claim, which, as I believe I have conclusively conveyed, was not the claim that i have attempted to make.
Most people, including myself, i.e. I and many, though not all, people who are not myself, or, in layman's terms "the others," of whom there are more than one or several, and, implicitly, significantly more than one, that is up to as many as all, though I'm not attempting to imply that all the people concur with the claim which I have not made, thou such a claim would be justifiable, nay, almost begging, though make a claim such as one which you are currently attempting to attribute to me I have not, even though experts tend to concur on your being a blithering buffoon.
