Coin
Explanation
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19219. (Read 26608391 times)
February 23, 2016, 10:00:48 AM
February 23, 2016, 09:01:46 AM
...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07ggt2
I'm not sure exactly what he means by this < snip >
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07ggt2
I'm not sure exactly what he means by this < snip >
Don't worry, there's another Bitcoin Round Table in the works
This weekend, 70 leaders in the Bitcoin and blockchain industry are meeting for a retreat.
Brought to you by The Bitcoin Foundation & Bruce "Fenton" Fenton 
Thx, I added a suggestion.
February 23, 2016, 09:00:49 AM
February 23, 2016, 08:57:31 AM
Ouch!
That was a heavy dump!
Finex and stamp had been down to 416!
That was a heavy dump!
Finex and stamp had been down to 416!
could you imagine some internet token being actually worth more than 400$?
either the dollar has deeply depreciate, or people have just gone mad.
Dollars in circulation: >1 trillion (M0 - cash) / >10 trillion (M3 - incl. bank deposits and cash equivalent)
Ounces of silver above ground: ~30 billion
Ounces of gold above ground: 6 billion
Bitcoins in circulation: 15 million
Scarcity is a factor.
DOGE is also an internet token but it can't cost 400$ as it is issued in the billions.
DOGE price: $ 0.000278 DOGE in circulation: 103 billion
Satoshi's are potentially infinitely divisible and they are issued in the billions.
which is why Satoshi's will never be worth more then 1/2 a cent
what a sad reality
February 23, 2016, 08:49:59 AM
...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07ggt2
I'm not sure exactly what he means by this < snip >
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07ggt2
I'm not sure exactly what he means by this < snip >
Don't worry, there's another Bitcoin Round Table in the works
This weekend, 70 leaders in the Bitcoin and blockchain industry are meeting for a retreat.
Brought to you by The Bitcoin Foundation & Bruce "Fenton" Fenton 
February 23, 2016, 08:47:14 AM
Ouch!
That was a heavy dump!
Finex and stamp had been down to 416!
That was a heavy dump!
Finex and stamp had been down to 416!
could you imagine some internet token being actually worth more than 400$?
either the dollar has deeply depreciate, or people have just gone mad.
Dollars in circulation: >1 trillion (M0 - cash) / >10 trillion (M3 - incl. bank deposits and cash equivalent)
Ounces of silver above ground: ~30 billion
Ounces of gold above ground: 6 billion
Bitcoins in circulation: 15 million
Scarcity is a factor.
DOGE is also an internet token but it can't cost 400$ as it is issued in the billions.
DOGE price: $ 0.000278 DOGE in circulation: 103 billion
Satoshi's are potentially infinitely divisible and they are issued in the billions.
February 23, 2016, 08:45:08 AM
...
Probably similar to "explain quantum physics to me in 30 seconds, no big words and be complete"
No, more like "it's rocket surgery, only we are qualified to do it; don't try to understand it. And yes, quality hookers and blow are essential to the process; shut the f8king door & get out."Probably similar to "explain quantum physics to me in 30 seconds, no big words and be complete"
JPMorgan testing proprietary blockchain technology:
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/jpmorgan-already-testing-dollar-remittance-via-blockchain-technology-between-2200-clients/
Yeah, whatevs. They'll never understand it, not like LukeJr. https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/jpmorgan-already-testing-dollar-remittance-via-blockchain-technology-between-2200-clients/
February 23, 2016, 08:43:40 AM
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 30 points 2 days ago
Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."[/i]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1
Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."[/i]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1
that's remarkable sound! never would have expected him to be able to such a insight/compromise.
now we only need to convince the other nutters left or get going without them. friedenbach would be to name here. i am surprised we havent heard anything from todd etc about their colleague being against the consensus.
And here's another nugget:
Quote
[–]apoefjmqdsfls -2 points 2 days ago
Is Gavin already searching for a new name?
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 0 points 2 days ago
Doesn't matter, the final version does not use any specific names (besides Core).
This was mainly to avoid negativity and give Classic a possibility of transforming into a part of this plan and a "legitimate" node software.
[–]keo604 -1 points 2 days ago
Legitimate, as approved by the centralists?
[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 2 points 2 days ago
As in not breaking from the community consensus. But yes, it is defined in the agreement by compatibility with Core. However, if Core were to depart from what has consensus, I think this would change the "foreseeable future" aspect, thus releasing the obligation entirely (but I don't expect this to happen).
Is Gavin already searching for a new name?
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 0 points 2 days ago
Doesn't matter, the final version does not use any specific names (besides Core).
This was mainly to avoid negativity and give Classic a possibility of transforming into a part of this plan and a "legitimate" node software.
[–]keo604 -1 points 2 days ago
Legitimate, as approved by the centralists?
[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 2 points 2 days ago
As in not breaking from the community consensus. But yes, it is defined in the agreement by compatibility with Core. However, if Core were to depart from what has consensus, I think this would change the "foreseeable future" aspect, thus releasing the obligation entirely (but I don't expect this to happen).
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07ggt2
I'm not sure exactly what he means by this, but it might look like they're trying to work with/leave a door open for Gavin and maybe Jeff. But Gavin and Jeff will probably need to see some real progress in order to lower their arms. If they can get the activation date set a bit earlier then that might be as good as it gets. The clock is ticking and I doubt they can convince miners to adopt Classic before/unless some promises are broken by Core. By July even Classic would struggle with an activation date earlier than Jan-Feb 2017.
February 23, 2016, 08:42:01 AM
JPMorgan testing proprietary blockchain technology:
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/jpmorgan-already-testing-dollar-remittance-via-blockchain-technology-between-2200-clients/
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/jpmorgan-already-testing-dollar-remittance-via-blockchain-technology-between-2200-clients/
February 23, 2016, 08:37:04 AM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.
Not according to this post ( point #4)
Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Bahahahahaha, good luck with that.
February 23, 2016, 08:36:00 AM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.
Not according to this post ( point #4)
Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Bahahahahaha, good luck with that.
True, it's all very scientific and dangerous, only a handful of men [Wizards] in the world understand it.
Protip: Make sure all Bitcoin documentation/code comments are in Church Latin, for further mystification.
February 23, 2016, 08:35:45 AM
as i say in my old post . never by more than 450 stable. forget on 500. now is it third time when is my prediction right. so dump .. hell i have do it in night .
You are correct. It's true until it's not.
February 23, 2016, 08:30:32 AM
Yeah heavy and unexpected!
I just closed a short because the price wouldn't drop
I just closed a short at loss then open a long right before the bump ><
I feel like the dumb guy paying for everyone else ><
I just closed a short because the price wouldn't drop
I just closed a short at loss then open a long right before the bump ><
I feel like the dumb guy paying for everyone else ><
Plan your trade, and trade your plan. If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.
Yeah. I've seen that one before, and I keep providing some version of that to various people close to me, and then I forgot about the quote. Thanks for the reminder.
February 23, 2016, 08:28:57 AM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.
Not according to this post ( point #4)
Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Bahahahahaha, good luck with that.
February 23, 2016, 08:26:54 AM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.
Not according to this post ( point #4)
Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.
February 23, 2016, 08:25:07 AM
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 30 points 2 days ago
Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."[/i]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1
Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."[/i]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1
that's remarkable sound! never would have expected him to be able to such a insight/compromise.
now we only need to convince the other nutters left or get going without them. friedenbach would be to name here. i am surprised we havent heard anything from todd etc about their colleague being against the consensus.
February 23, 2016, 08:20:59 AM
It turns out it's not just Bitcoiners who's struggling with core:
"[–]Roman Catholic luke-jr 1 point 1 day ago
Catholicism is not a branch, it is the Faith, and the Roman Catholic Church is the specific institution defined by God. The only reconciliation is therefore those outside the Church abandoning their errors and joining the Church. Any other kind of "reunion" is inherently evil and sinful to pursue."
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueChristian/comments/46lmei/views_on_christian_ecumenism/d0948fy
Good choice guyz!
Jokes aside, I was actually kind of optimistic when I saw some of his comments on the roundtable thread on reddit. Especially this:
"[–]chriswheeler 8 points 2 days ago
So why have you just signed a statement agreeing to implement a hard fork?
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 30 points 2 days ago
Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1
February 23, 2016, 08:15:30 AM
...
you are just plain wrong, likely mis-informed by the company you keep. The necessary LN bitcoin TXs that open and close channels will be immediately identifiable by the bitcoin miners who can demand as high fees as they feel necessary to provide their precious adjudication services for the LN. ...
you are just plain wrong, likely mis-informed by the company you keep. The necessary LN bitcoin TXs that open and close channels will be immediately identifiable by the bitcoin miners who can demand as high fees as they feel necessary to provide their precious adjudication services for the LN. ...
Interesting point. I wonder why they choose not to up their fees now? You should let them in on this cool thing you've just discovered, they might cut you in on teh profitz
I could have copyrighted the use of "satoshi" for the smallest unit when I standardised/named it,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50647
that might have been profitable ... but Satoshi deserves all the kudos.
Serious? Kiba mentioned it first.
February 23, 2016, 08:13:20 AM
wow look at that crazy knife attack in the night
silly bears
silly bears
February 23, 2016, 08:00:48 AM
Jump to: