Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19228.

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 22, 2016, 10:53:52 AM

Quote from: aztecminer on February 22, 2016, 10:45:01 AM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:48:49 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:45:57 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:39:36 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:38:45 PM

We've been getting full blocks all day. Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

i'd say we've been speculating about how a HF will result in 2 chains, or will never be fixed, consensus will never be reached, core dev's out to kill bitcoin, XT classic, everything expect a fix. So many times market has dropped hard on blocksizebitchfest related things. no one speculated they would come up with segwit. and when they did market wrongfully didn't react ( probably because people dont understand how gr8 segwit is)

market price is totally incorrect right now.

yeah i dont know how great "segwit" is yet .. i better find out fast or i wont get anything done today from laughing .

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: Elwar on February 22, 2016, 10:58:06 AM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 22, 2016, 10:53:52 AM

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

Hopefully you're right Elwar unless any more self obsessed idiots in public positions want to try & destroy bitcoin AGAIN !!!!

Elwar

legendary

Activity: 3598

Merit: 2386

Viva Ut Vivas

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 22, 2016, 10:53:52 AM

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:50:49 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:40:28 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:37:48 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:29:08 AM

...
What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak Kiss

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.

different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

Lol @ not understanding that different clients are different because different rules & that any hard fork will make any client not following it as relevant as BBQ client.

any hard fork would lead to an altcoin with their respective node percentage vs the rest of the clients, sure, but keep diggin while you are at it

adamstgBit

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1037

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: aztecminer on February 22, 2016, 10:45:01 AM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:48:49 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:45:57 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:39:36 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:38:45 PM

We've been getting full blocks all day. Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

i'd say we've been speculating about how a HF will result in 2 chains, or will never be fixed, consensus will never be reached, core dev's out to kill bitcoin, XT classic, everything expect a fix. So many times market has dropped hard on blocksizebitchfest related things. no one speculated they would come up with segwit. and when they did market wrongfully didn't react ( probably because people dont understand how gr8 segwit is)

market price is totally incorrect right now.

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:40:28 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:37:48 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:29:08 AM

...
What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak Kiss

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.

different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

Lol @ not understanding that different clients are different because different rules & that any hard fork will make any client not following it as relevant as BBQ client.

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:48:49 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:45:57 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:39:36 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:38:45 PM

We've been getting full blocks all day. Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

edgar

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1001

#aztecspastic

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:37:48 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:29:08 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:09:10 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:02:32 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:41:55 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a ~~stump speech~~ document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time

Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document" Cheesy

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak Kiss

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.

different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:29:08 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:09:10 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:02:32 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:41:55 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a ~~stump speech~~ document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time

Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document" Cheesy

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak Kiss

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

Re. pedo freak: Who's the bro taking fashion cues from Uncle Fester?

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

i think this weekends pump causing the blocks to fill up proves that bitcoin is without a doubt #paralyzed... and i'm going to laugh at it! .. that is some funny shiat! without the ability to scale bitcoin cant win. lol. too funny.... i doubt bitcoin can withstand much more pumping without completely freezing up . that really is hilarious.. #GimpedCoin

BlindMayorBitcorn

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1116

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 22, 2016, 10:19:39 AM

I think I know why satoshi decided to be out of the game: that photograph is so scary Grin

Damn..... This is getting so lame

Totally. If I hadn’t needed to use Bitcoin for my online drugs business I would never have got involved with you toxic lot. Embarrassed

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 10:09:10 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:02:32 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:41:55 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a ~~stump speech~~ document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time

Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document" Cheesy

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak Kiss

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 22, 2016, 10:00:51 AM

Coin

Explanation

lol at 94% full blocks this morning. #GimpCoined ...

Tzupy

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1094

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

The poll results look like two wolves and a lamb voting what to have for lunch.

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:42:18 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 09:39:36 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:38:45 PM

We've been getting full blocks all day. Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

if we actually start filling 4MB blocks completely full by 2017

how high is price going to be?

Grin

yeah but... bitcoin doesnt have 4MB blocks. #incompetence

Karartma1

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1422

I think I know why satoshi decided to be out of the game: that photograph is so scary Grin

Damn..... This is getting so lame

aztecminer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 09:38:45 PM

We've been getting full blocks all day. Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

imo that is #incompetence ...

bargainbin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: hdbuck on February 22, 2016, 10:02:32 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:41:55 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a ~~stump speech~~ document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time

Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document" Cheesy

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:41:55 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 09:26:39 AM

Quote from: arandy on February 22, 2016, 09:22:34 AM

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a ~~stump speech~~ document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time

Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document" Cheesy

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19228. (Read 26608306 times)