Why is dogecoin going to the moon 
'Cause when every crypto is stupid you go with the stupid crypto
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19470. (Read 26686386 times)
January 31, 2016, 08:56:22 AM
'Cause when every crypto is stupid you go with the stupid crypto
January 31, 2016, 08:39:07 AM
Why is dogecoin going to the moon
January 31, 2016, 08:37:08 AM
Terry Wogan died, take a look at the norwegian headline: "Terry "Norway Zero points" Wogan er død"
http://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/Terry-Norway-Zero-points-Wogan-er-dod-8339241.html
Refuse to believe that's a real language. "død♌ efter ♑t kort s♎keleie, 77 år ga♋mel"?! Really?
You guys are too much
@BMB: Now we see the violence inherent in the system!
January 31, 2016, 08:34:36 AM
But for this to work it has to be tethered to the BTC chain...and there we'll have our Bitcoin world war II
In fact, I foresee considerable opposition to implement sidechain hooks in Bitcoin Core. But sidechains can add so much value to Bitcoin that the change is likely to be implemented. If not, Bitcoin might soon become obsolete and give way to an equivalent network that implements extensibility via sidechains.
I wonder what happens when the regulators realize that sidechains can put privacy and anonymity back ;-)
I think this is a really good question. How centralized does development have to become before it becomes liable? What exactly can Blockstream be held accountable for if CT sidechain is implemented? Just wondering out loud...
January 31, 2016, 08:32:59 AM
Terry Wogan died, take a look at the norwegian headline: "Terry "Norway Zero points" Wogan er død"
http://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/Terry-Norway-Zero-points-Wogan-er-dod-8339241.html
Huh, that's sad. It would, however, explain the $5 between the Eurovision-area exchanges (e.g. BTC-e) and the non-Eurovision exchanges (Stamp, Finex). It looks like Tel has a lot of fans in China, too.
January 31, 2016, 08:20:37 AM
Terry Wogan died, take a look at the norwegian headline: "Terry "Norway Zero points" Wogan er død"
http://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/Terry-Norway-Zero-points-Wogan-er-dod-8339241.html
January 31, 2016, 08:16:12 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?
Don't tell me what I need. It's that kind of arrogance that is going to make Bitcoin an asterisk in the history of cryptocurrencies. Businesses that dictate to their customers what they should want are gonna have a bad time.
Bitcoin is not a business, it is a protocol.
Is "ZOMG BITCOIN IS GOING TO DIE BECAUSE ARROGANCE" really your position?
...
And Assburgers. Must not forget Assburgers.
January 31, 2016, 08:02:26 AM
January 31, 2016, 07:26:45 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason.
Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse).
Think you a chap. Find out here for a tongue in cheek review of gentlemen
http://thechap.co.uk/category/am-i-chap/
January 31, 2016, 07:25:01 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason.
Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse).
when in debate, don't.
translated into bitcoin code is status quo.
January 31, 2016, 07:01:25 AM
January 31, 2016, 06:50:03 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason.
Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse).
January 31, 2016, 06:36:36 AM
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place.
Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need.
I have experienced drugs and porn but have never owned or worn alpaca socks. Since you used "and" between the three items can I assume 2 out of 3 lets me off the hook ie I remain a gentleman and a bitcoin user. (disclaimer - I have woollen socks from sheep and a 50;50 wool/possum blend but I see alpaca as a bridge too far)
January 31, 2016, 06:24:53 AM
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place.
Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need.
January 31, 2016, 06:01:27 AM
January 31, 2016, 05:42:46 AM
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place.
Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need.
January 31, 2016, 05:31:20 AM
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place.
January 31, 2016, 05:15:16 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
January 31, 2016, 05:01:36 AM
January 31, 2016, 04:01:51 AM
Jump to: