Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19875. (Read 26609134 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Got out at $441. Thinking about getting back in at $337. Money coming into exchanges tomorrow, but that wall on stamp is ugly sauce. Buy, hodl, or short?

Getting back in $337? Lol, so you will never buy bitcoins again. All this pumps to 470/500 are tests and acumulation, if me reach 600 it will never go back.

I'm not talking about buying. I buy every month. Duh!
I'm talking about trading here, and yes, there is a difference.

333 is a bit of a pipe dream
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022
Got out at $441. Thinking about getting back in at $337. Money coming into exchanges tomorrow, but that wall on stamp is ugly sauce. Buy, hodl, or short?

Getting back in $337? Lol, so you will never buy bitcoins again. All this pumps to 470/500 are tests and acumulation, if me reach 600 it will never go back.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
Seriously, you guys are still counting BTC/CNY volume on Huobi and OKCoin? Get a clue.

Thinking is kinda what we do here now. Old-timer. Tongue
Calling me 'old timer' only adds to my point here. Nearly two years ago I left, when all of this Chinese bs was going on, and when I came back I expected was ample time for the Chinese to be completely capitulated and out of the market, and that that fake CNY volume would be completely debunked. In fact it is well known that the CNY volume is fake and it was even way back then. Coindesk doesn't even include those exchanges in it's calculation. USD and adoption are supposed to be running the show now, but here we still have jokers talking about how 'the imaginary chinese whale dumped his 80,000btc/cny on Huobi'.

Except that it's not USD and adoption running the show, if it were so then price would be sub 200$.
The largely fake Chinese volume, with apparently Huobi leading, is driving the price.

At what point do you realise that the market is right and it is you that is wrong?
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1005
That's was just a bear trap.

Time to buy back in, if you didn't already
hero member
Activity: 681
Merit: 507
fuck off.. bought back in
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
@cato/lamb/etc

Hmm. Kind of difficult to feel sorry for that ban, given how much meaningless spam your accounts did produce over the year(s).

That said, the 'lying guard' remark on volume actually gave me a new idea on the whole volume deal (as in: look at it as 1st, 2nd, etc. order readings), so I'd like to say thanks for that Smiley
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
Lambie chillin' in front of her screen watching the steady organic growth like



We're just over here watching it too, like

full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
Let's see if the Chinese have manned up in order to break the three thousand level.
legendary
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1007
Patiently waiting for 500

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
so a 500 coin pump causes a $5 price bump. At that rate, it would take only 3 million $ to get to $500 and probably ~ 10 million bucks to do it world wide. Get at it, bulls. You know you've been waiting all weekend for your discount, so BUY BUY BUY because new fiat gets to the exchanges when the banks open tomorrow.


legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?
It's easy. The bear whale will try to buy back all the bitcoins they sold out yesterday before Monday. It is not possible without new top though.
 
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?

Years of staring at the charts, combined with blind luck  Grin .

Lol. OK thx =D
Don't think we are done yet by the way, I am guessing this goes to 445-450.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.




Care for some roasted lamb, anyone?




hero member
Activity: 1132
Merit: 818
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?

Years of staring at the charts, combined with blind luck  Grin .

Lol. OK thx =D
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?

Years of staring at the charts, combined with blind luck  Grin .
hero member
Activity: 1132
Merit: 818
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
Some of you (bears) need to accept we are now in BULL mode. For the next few years at least. So, yes we will have dips and corrections, but the general trend is now- UP. Don't fight the trend.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
@CATO

Just saw your follow up post... Looks like you're equating "truthfulness" with "randomness" - that's quite an assumption.

For example (simplifying), you could treat one volume as (mostly) representing "demand", and the other as (mostly) representing "the appearance of demand". If you could correctly tell which it is (not necessarily always, but with more certainty than by pure chance),  the latter volume contains information again you could include in your model.

Not saying that's the way to go, but just to show that "somewhat predictably lying" is still information, even if the output has to be put through a different function than non-lying information


(EDIT) Also, that was one of the fastest ignores, @^
Jump to: