Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 20647. (Read 26609464 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
The entity I'm referring to is Bitfury

1. They're already wealthy people.
2. They have loads of VC money
3. They used to make what is likely to be ridiculous amounts of profits selling mining gear.

I have heard the argument "he is rich therefore he doesn't need more money" used to introduce a couple of egregious scammers and thieves.  Even in this context, it is a bogus argument: usually, rich people are rich because they always want to make more money that they already have.

I'm convinced KNC is not selling all of their coins.

KnC seems to be "selling" some of their mined coins in the form of the XBT Tracker One Electronically Traded Notes.  Those are issued through NASDAQ Sweden by a company somehow connected to them.   As I understand it, KnC keeps the bitcoins and sell IOUs that promise to pay the holder whatever the current BTC price will be at the time.  

The buyers of those notes may be a different population than the people who buy at the exchanges, so those "sales" may not impact the price immediately (as they would if KnC were to sell the BTC on the exchanges).  However, if many holders decide to redeem the notes, KnC may be forced to sell the BTC to raise the money for that.

The notes that they issued and sold so far correspond to ~16'000 BTC.  I am too lazy to compute how much that represents compared to their mining (~8% of the hashrate presently, which means ~12 × 25 BTC every day).

If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

It would be perfectly logical to consider $400 a low price a year ago, and $230 a high price today...  Grin

Anyway, miners have an obvious incentive to lie and hide their sales.  Whether they hold or sell immediately, they very much want everybody else to buy and hold.  
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000

nice discussion we got going here.  Grin

no i don't know exactly were freshly mined coins are going. nobody knows. everybody has just hear-and-say informations.

i personally did some business some time ago with mining farm folks and my impression was they gave a shit about bitcoin. privately they held no more than a handful of coins maybe. for them it was just a better kind of investment as into high-yield-bonds or something.

but i accept that bitfury may keep them, quite possible.

nevertheless the market has to absorb 1 mioUS$ everyday, thats a fucking lot and halving will kick some ass.

Make it half that

If they are not selling their coins, then they need to raise *an* amount of fresh capital (or use reserves) every day to cover production costs and keep the lights on. Either way, the money has to come into the system unless they have 'free' electricity. If they are not selling the production it is hard to see how much of the new funding can go into development of infrastructure in an environment of falling prices (which presumably means they are even more reluctant to sell ...)

Well, I guess we know now where the VC money is really going. Whether that was their intention or not is another matter ...
Probably gives them a bit of extra leeway to 'massage' the market ... can't believe they would sit on their hands and not buy more if it they were too cheap to sell at $350-$400 ish ...


There's another way to look at this (I think). You either mine to sell instantly or you mine because you or your investors want coins. Coins that would otherwise have been bought at exchanges. Either way they're absorbed by the market.

That is totally reasonable. And works for as long as the miners can continue to raise extra funding from this type of VC, who in reality, may aswell buy and hold BTC themselves (on or off exchange) and not take the risk on the company and what it may or may not do with or wthout their permission.

EDIT: I guess we will never really know, so its kind of an endless and pointless discussion at the end of the day ... but this is the SPECUALTION forum so we don't need 'facts'  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC

nice discussion we got going here.  Grin

no i don't know exactly were freshly mined coins are going. nobody knows. everybody has just hear-and-say informations.

i personally did some business some time ago with mining farm folks and my impression was they gave a shit about bitcoin. privately they held no more than a handful of coins maybe. for them it was just a better kind of investment as into high-yield-bonds or something.

but i accept that bitfury may keep them, quite possible.

nevertheless the market has to absorb 1 mioUS$ everyday, thats a fucking lot and halving will kick some ass.

Make it half that

If they are not selling their coins, then they need to raise *an* amount of fresh capital (or use reserves) every day to cover production costs and keep the lights on. Either way, the money has to come into the system unless they have 'free' electricity. If they are not selling the production it is hard to see how much of the new funding can go into development of infrastructure in an environment of falling prices (which presumably means they are even more reluctant to sell ...)

Well, I guess we know now where the VC money is really going. Whether that was their intention or not is another matter ...
Probably gives them a bit of extra leeway to 'massage' the market ... can't believe they would sit on their hands and not buy more if it they were too cheap to sell at $350-$400 ish ...


There's another way to look at this (I think). You either mine to sell instantly or you mine because you or your investors want coins. Coins that would otherwise have been bought at exchanges. Either way they're absorbed by the market.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

A lesson?

priceless!
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
You guys are bad at trading. Looking at the daily charts the major resistance and supply area is around $300. Whenever price hit that area there was massive selling. Most likely that will be the top in the near term, then it will either go back down to the $220's or hopefully would break the $300 and then retest it on heading higher.

I don't see it breaking $300 yet, maybe closer to the halving.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
how do they pay electricity if they don't sell their coins? 15 % of the network today is like few MW a month.

The entire network probably pulls around 250MW. At 4 cents per kw/h that's $240,000 per day in electricity. Which would be 1000 coins a day when the price is $240.

Now at $263 that's 912.5 coins. At $300 that's 800 coins.

Now that's just electricity, but if you assume that a large part of the mining community wants to keep as many coins as possible until prices improve you might expect the supply of coins to tighten as the price moves up.

Could you offer TL;DR of how you've arrived at 250MW?  Not doubting you, just wondering what that number is meant to represent.

The network is at 500 petahash  and the machines are pulling an average of 0.5w/gh (Ant s3 0.7w/gh, SP-tech 0.6w/gh, ant s5 0.5w/gh and newer gear 0.25w/gh).


As far as miners wishing to sell coins when they're worth less and hold on to them once they're worth more?  Seems a bit counterintuitive, can you walk me through your reasoning?

I think a lot of miners see BTC as undervalued now and want to hold as much as possible until the price heads north. That's a messy business model, so I'm not sure how many can convince their investment partners to agree to it. But I seriously doubt that there are that many who don't have a business model where the mine pays its own bills. As in where bills are paid out of the owners pockets rather than selling minted coins. They are probably out there, but I don't think they're a major factor.

However, there is a reason why I wrote "if you assume". I can't wholeheartedly support this theory. It may very well be that a large majority converts all of their coins fairly immediately. That's a tidy and safe business model..... then again, nothing is safe in Bitcoinland. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
The idea that 3600 coins are being dumped on the market daily is a myth.

3600 coins are created daily. demand absorbs them, otherwise price would fall. nothing mythical about it.

Well to be clear the myth is that miners sell those coins on the market which would definitely affect the price.

In reality it isn't so black and white and a considerable portion of coins are certainly held by these same miners.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

A lesson?

 Roll Eyes

Yes, I'm sure millionaires that have probably been mining since the double digits days are quite bothered by a price drop.

.... or maybe not http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-details-100-million-georgia-data-center/

Quote
BitFury will invest $100m in building a 100MW bitcoin mining data centre in Georgia
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
The idea that 3600 coins are being dumped on the market daily is a myth.

3600 coins are created daily. demand absorbs them, otherwise price would fall. nothing mythical about it.
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
todays miners are not bitcoin-enthusiasts anymore, they sell their coins as fast as they can.

I've been making that assumption. But is there any evidence?

therefore the halving will be a big fucking kick in their ass.

are you suggesting they should start to HODL more? (I agree of course)

but that would make the price go up in anticipation of the halving!?!
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

A lesson?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

They don't care, because

1. They're already wealthy people.
2. They have loads of VC money
3. They used to make what is likely to be ridiculous amounts of profits selling mining gear.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000

nice discussion we got going here.  Grin

no i don't know exactly were freshly mined coins are going. nobody knows. everybody has just hear-and-say informations.

i personally did some business some time ago with mining farm folks and my impression was they gave a shit about bitcoin. privately they held no more than a handful of coins maybe. for them it was just a better kind of investment as into high-yield-bonds or something.

but i accept that bitfury may keep them, quite possible.

nevertheless the market has to absorb 1 mioUS$ everyday, thats a fucking lot and halving will kick some ass.

Make it half that

If they are not selling their coins, then they need to raise *an* amount of fresh capital (or use reserves) every day to cover production costs and keep the lights on. Either way, the money has to come into the system unless they have 'free' electricity. If they are not selling the production it is hard to see how much of the new funding can go into development of infrastructure in an environment of falling prices (which presumably means they are even more reluctant to sell ...)

Well, I guess we know now where the VC money is really going. Whether that was their intention or not is another matter ...
Probably gives them a bit of extra leeway to 'massage' the market ... can't believe they would sit on their hands and not buy more if it they were too cheap to sell at $350-$400 ish ...
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miner-bitfury-raises-20-million/

Quote
Vavilov told CoinDesk that it decided not to tap its bitcoin reserves as it remains bullish on the long-term value of bitcoin.

"We believe in the long-term perspective [the price of bitcoin] will grow and we decided to not to sell [our bitcoin] at such a low price," Vavilov added.

The quote is not from that article, but from this one: http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-raises-20-million-asic-development-mining-output/, dated 9th October 2014, when BTC was around 350-400 USD. Back then it was quite fashionable for miners to not sell their Bitcoins, what could possibly go wrong after all?

... can you read?

Quote
"We believe in the long-term perspective [the price of bitcoin] will grow and we decided to not to sell [our bitcoin] at such a low price," Vavilov added.

If 350-400$ was a low price back then what do you believe they consider 250 nowadays?

Spare me with your trolling...
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
Because the largest solo miner, for example, has publicly said they don't sell their bitcoins.

Source?


http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miner-bitfury-raises-20-million/

Quote
Vavilov told CoinDesk that it decided not to tap its bitcoin reserves as it remains bullish on the long-term value of bitcoin.

"We believe in the long-term perspective [the price of bitcoin] will grow and we decided to not to sell [our bitcoin] at such a low price," Vavilov added.

So, their funding rounds are basically to pay for their costs while they hold their coins. How could that possibly go wrong?  Roll Eyes

No, their funding round is likely to develop new ASIC technology and develop their infrastructure.

As I've said previously they've had other revenue sources in the past which might still pay for their existing costs.

Moreover I'm quite confident their energy costs are absurdly low since they seem to have quite a special relation with the government where their farms are set up (Georgia)
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miner-bitfury-raises-20-million/

Quote
Vavilov told CoinDesk that it decided not to tap its bitcoin reserves as it remains bullish on the long-term value of bitcoin.

"We believe in the long-term perspective [the price of bitcoin] will grow and we decided to not to sell [our bitcoin] at such a low price," Vavilov added.

The quote is not from that article, but from this one: http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-raises-20-million-asic-development-mining-output/, dated 9th October 2014, when BTC was around 350-400 USD. Back then it was quite fashionable for miners to not sell their Bitcoins, what could possibly go wrong after all?
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

nice discussion we got going here.  Grin

no i don't know exactly were freshly mined coins are going. nobody knows. everybody has just hear-and-say informations.

i personally did some business some time ago with mining farm folks and my impression was they gave a shit about bitcoin. privately they held no more than a handful of coins maybe. for them it was just a better kind of investment as into high-yield-bonds or something.

but i accept that bitfury may keep them, quite possible.

nevertheless the market has to absorb 1 mioUS$ everyday, thats a fucking lot and halving will kick some ass.

Make it half that
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Because the largest solo miner, for example, has publicly said they don't sell their bitcoins.

Source?


http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miner-bitfury-raises-20-million/

Quote
Vavilov told CoinDesk that it decided not to tap its bitcoin reserves as it remains bullish on the long-term value of bitcoin.

"We believe in the long-term perspective [the price of bitcoin] will grow and we decided to not to sell [our bitcoin] at such a low price," Vavilov added.

So, their funding rounds are basically to pay for their costs while they hold their coins. How could that possibly go wrong?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
My name is Randy, and I'm a member of MMM Global Bitcoin.

"Helping more people."



sounds like any bulltard here.

...

when will the panic start? 220?

Weekly update: https://www.facebook.com/MMMGlobalRB/videos/vl.1036580956373009/406671159525960/?type=1&theater

tl;dr: "Hello, here is the news. Everything is wonderful in the Republic of Bitcoin. "
Jump to: